分娩方式和胎儿性别对降低死胎率的意义:使用广义回归模型

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"分娩方式和胎儿性别对降低死胎率的意义:使用广义回归模型","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Despite stillbirth being a significant burden for maternal lives, families, and communities worldwide, it is often neglected and overlooked in many countries. The fetal gender and the delivery method are two interaction factors that directly impact the stillbirth rate. This study aimed to identify the impact of fetal gender on stillbirth delivery methods, either cesarean section or vaginal delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The current research analyzed the stillbirths recorded over ten years between January 1st, 2008, and December 31st, 2017, obtained from the Maternity Teaching Hospital in Erbil City, the capital of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed that stillbirths remain a significant public health concern in the region, with 11.7 stillbirths occurring for every 1000 deliveries. The generalized regression model for each normal, beta, and gamma distribution was used to determine the best fit of the data. The study found that for fetal males, vaginal delivery reduced the stillbirth rate by 4.2 % and the cesarean section rate by 3.6 % while for fetal females, vaginal delivery reduced the stillbirth rate by 4.7 % and the cesarean section rate by 6 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings suggest that healthcare in the region should prioritize reducing the incidence of stillbirths during pregnancy and delivery, considering factors such as fetal gender and delivery mode.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002069/pdfft?md5=31006b5e9e5423afc92bee2e559d365a&pid=1-s2.0-S2213398424002069-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The significance of delivery methods and fetal gender in reducing stillbirth rate: Using the generalized regression model\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Despite stillbirth being a significant burden for maternal lives, families, and communities worldwide, it is often neglected and overlooked in many countries. The fetal gender and the delivery method are two interaction factors that directly impact the stillbirth rate. This study aimed to identify the impact of fetal gender on stillbirth delivery methods, either cesarean section or vaginal delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The current research analyzed the stillbirths recorded over ten years between January 1st, 2008, and December 31st, 2017, obtained from the Maternity Teaching Hospital in Erbil City, the capital of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed that stillbirths remain a significant public health concern in the region, with 11.7 stillbirths occurring for every 1000 deliveries. The generalized regression model for each normal, beta, and gamma distribution was used to determine the best fit of the data. The study found that for fetal males, vaginal delivery reduced the stillbirth rate by 4.2 % and the cesarean section rate by 3.6 % while for fetal females, vaginal delivery reduced the stillbirth rate by 4.7 % and the cesarean section rate by 6 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings suggest that healthcare in the region should prioritize reducing the incidence of stillbirths during pregnancy and delivery, considering factors such as fetal gender and delivery mode.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002069/pdfft?md5=31006b5e9e5423afc92bee2e559d365a&pid=1-s2.0-S2213398424002069-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的尽管死胎是全世界孕产妇生命、家庭和社区的重大负担,但在许多国家却常常被忽视和忽视。胎儿性别和分娩方式是直接影响死胎率的两个交互因素。本研究旨在确定胎儿性别对死产分娩方式(剖宫产或阴道分娩)的影响。方法本研究分析了伊拉克库尔德斯坦地区首府埃尔比勒市妇产教学医院在 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日十年间记录的死产情况。结果结果显示,死产仍然是该地区一个重要的公共卫生问题,每 1000 例分娩中就有 11.7 例死产。研究采用了正态分布、贝塔分布和伽马分布的广义回归模型来确定数据的最佳拟合度。研究发现,对于男性胎儿,阴道分娩可使死胎率降低 4.2%,剖宫产率降低 3.6%;而对于女性胎儿,阴道分娩可使死胎率降低 4.7%,剖宫产率降低 6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The significance of delivery methods and fetal gender in reducing stillbirth rate: Using the generalized regression model

Aim

Despite stillbirth being a significant burden for maternal lives, families, and communities worldwide, it is often neglected and overlooked in many countries. The fetal gender and the delivery method are two interaction factors that directly impact the stillbirth rate. This study aimed to identify the impact of fetal gender on stillbirth delivery methods, either cesarean section or vaginal delivery.

Method

The current research analyzed the stillbirths recorded over ten years between January 1st, 2008, and December 31st, 2017, obtained from the Maternity Teaching Hospital in Erbil City, the capital of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

Results

The results showed that stillbirths remain a significant public health concern in the region, with 11.7 stillbirths occurring for every 1000 deliveries. The generalized regression model for each normal, beta, and gamma distribution was used to determine the best fit of the data. The study found that for fetal males, vaginal delivery reduced the stillbirth rate by 4.2 % and the cesarean section rate by 3.6 % while for fetal females, vaginal delivery reduced the stillbirth rate by 4.7 % and the cesarean section rate by 6 %.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that healthcare in the region should prioritize reducing the incidence of stillbirths during pregnancy and delivery, considering factors such as fetal gender and delivery mode.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信