预测尼泊尔半山地区奇松(Pinus roxburghii)上部茎干直径的锥度函数

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
Pradip Saud , Tolak R. Chapagain , Shes K. Bhandari , W. Keith Moser
{"title":"预测尼泊尔半山地区奇松(Pinus roxburghii)上部茎干直径的锥度函数","authors":"Pradip Saud ,&nbsp;Tolak R. Chapagain ,&nbsp;Shes K. Bhandari ,&nbsp;W. Keith Moser","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A function that predicts the upper stem diameters of an individual tree is helpful in better quantifying the volume and devising sustainable management of commercially and ecologically important species. This study compares three forms of the taper equation (single, variable-exponent, and segmented) using destructive sample data collected from 80 Chir pine (<em>Pinus roxburghii</em> Sarg.) trees across three adjacent stands in the Mid hills of Nepal. A mixed-effects modeling approach was used to evaluate the 13 different taper functions, selecting the best parameter association with the random effect to avoid overparameterization. Additionally, these models were fitted to minimize errors by modeling correlation structure with continuous autoregressive correlation structure of order 1 (corCAR1) and variance with a power variance function. All models were statistically significant at 5% level in the likelihood ratio test when compared with the models fitted without these error minimization. Furthermore, model performance (root mean square error, mean absolute error, and pseudo-R<sup>2</sup>) was evaluated using k-fold cross-validation procedure. Although all taper functions described more than 95% of the variation in upper stem diameter prediction, the single-form models of Bennett and Swindel (1972) and Amidon (1984), the variable-exponent model form of Sharma and Zhang (2004), and the segmented model form of Max and Burkhart (1976) explained more than 98% percent of the variability. Residual diagnostics indicated that Sharma and Zhang's (2004) model provided better constant and minimum errors in predicting the upper stem diameter along the 8 to 20 m stem length, whereas other models exhibited higher residual errors. Despite model's better performance, variability along the upper stem diameter prediction would affect its applicability in estimating the volume at any merchantable height of individual trees.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001341/pdfft?md5=c93b22f3df90debf6c347b3d22ffc9ae&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001341-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taper functions to predict the upper stem diameter of Chir pine (Pinus roxburghii) in the mid-hills of Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Pradip Saud ,&nbsp;Tolak R. Chapagain ,&nbsp;Shes K. Bhandari ,&nbsp;W. Keith Moser\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A function that predicts the upper stem diameters of an individual tree is helpful in better quantifying the volume and devising sustainable management of commercially and ecologically important species. This study compares three forms of the taper equation (single, variable-exponent, and segmented) using destructive sample data collected from 80 Chir pine (<em>Pinus roxburghii</em> Sarg.) trees across three adjacent stands in the Mid hills of Nepal. A mixed-effects modeling approach was used to evaluate the 13 different taper functions, selecting the best parameter association with the random effect to avoid overparameterization. Additionally, these models were fitted to minimize errors by modeling correlation structure with continuous autoregressive correlation structure of order 1 (corCAR1) and variance with a power variance function. All models were statistically significant at 5% level in the likelihood ratio test when compared with the models fitted without these error minimization. Furthermore, model performance (root mean square error, mean absolute error, and pseudo-R<sup>2</sup>) was evaluated using k-fold cross-validation procedure. Although all taper functions described more than 95% of the variation in upper stem diameter prediction, the single-form models of Bennett and Swindel (1972) and Amidon (1984), the variable-exponent model form of Sharma and Zhang (2004), and the segmented model form of Max and Burkhart (1976) explained more than 98% percent of the variability. Residual diagnostics indicated that Sharma and Zhang's (2004) model provided better constant and minimum errors in predicting the upper stem diameter along the 8 to 20 m stem length, whereas other models exhibited higher residual errors. Despite model's better performance, variability along the upper stem diameter prediction would affect its applicability in estimating the volume at any merchantable height of individual trees.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001341/pdfft?md5=c93b22f3df90debf6c347b3d22ffc9ae&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001341-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测单棵树木上部茎干直径的函数有助于更好地量化商业和生态上重要树种的体积并设计可持续管理。本研究利用从尼泊尔中山地区三个相邻林分的 80 棵奇松(Pinus roxburghii Sarg.)采集的破坏性样本数据,比较了三种形式的锥度方程(单一、可变分量和分段)。采用混合效应建模方法评估了 13 种不同的锥度函数,选择了与随机效应相关的最佳参数,以避免参数过大。此外,这些模型还采用 1 阶连续自回归相关结构(corCAR1)和幂方差函数对相关结构和方差进行建模,以尽量减少误差。在似然比检验中,与未进行误差最小化处理的模型相比,所有模型在 5%的水平上都具有统计学意义。此外,还使用 k 倍交叉验证程序评估了模型性能(均方根误差、平均绝对误差和伪 R2)。虽然所有锥度函数都能描述茎秆上部直径预测中 95% 以上的变异,但 Bennett 和 Swindel(1972 年)和 Amidon(1984 年)的单形式模型、Sharma 和 Zhang(2004 年)的变指数模型形式以及 Max 和 Burkhart(1976 年)的分段模型形式能解释 98% 以上的变异。残差诊断表明,Sharma 和 Zhang(2004 年)的模型在预测 8 至 20 米茎干长度的茎干上部直径方面提供了较好的常数和最小误差,而其他模型则表现出较高的残差误差。尽管模型的性能较好,但茎干上部直径预测的变异性会影响其在估算单棵树木任何可销售高度的体积时的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taper functions to predict the upper stem diameter of Chir pine (Pinus roxburghii) in the mid-hills of Nepal

A function that predicts the upper stem diameters of an individual tree is helpful in better quantifying the volume and devising sustainable management of commercially and ecologically important species. This study compares three forms of the taper equation (single, variable-exponent, and segmented) using destructive sample data collected from 80 Chir pine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) trees across three adjacent stands in the Mid hills of Nepal. A mixed-effects modeling approach was used to evaluate the 13 different taper functions, selecting the best parameter association with the random effect to avoid overparameterization. Additionally, these models were fitted to minimize errors by modeling correlation structure with continuous autoregressive correlation structure of order 1 (corCAR1) and variance with a power variance function. All models were statistically significant at 5% level in the likelihood ratio test when compared with the models fitted without these error minimization. Furthermore, model performance (root mean square error, mean absolute error, and pseudo-R2) was evaluated using k-fold cross-validation procedure. Although all taper functions described more than 95% of the variation in upper stem diameter prediction, the single-form models of Bennett and Swindel (1972) and Amidon (1984), the variable-exponent model form of Sharma and Zhang (2004), and the segmented model form of Max and Burkhart (1976) explained more than 98% percent of the variability. Residual diagnostics indicated that Sharma and Zhang's (2004) model provided better constant and minimum errors in predicting the upper stem diameter along the 8 to 20 m stem length, whereas other models exhibited higher residual errors. Despite model's better performance, variability along the upper stem diameter prediction would affect its applicability in estimating the volume at any merchantable height of individual trees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信