从能力和特质角度对大学生情商结构的评价研究

Hadya Adel Abdelrehim, Mahmoud Ali Moussa
{"title":"从能力和特质角度对大学生情商结构的评价研究","authors":"Hadya Adel Abdelrehim, Mahmoud Ali Moussa","doi":"10.21608/psjer.2024.265051.1033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to evaluate emotional intelligence (EI) models in Egyptian university students, focusing on the abilities and traits of 280 senior students at Suez Canal University. The researchers used descriptive and comparative causal approaches and used the BEIS-10 modified scale and the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue-30) to test both the general factor perspective and the sub-factors. The results of the two-factor model revealed that the items of EI loaded on one single factor, while most of the traits model items loaded on two factors. This implies that ability serves as the core for emotional thinking, emphasizing the necessity of emotional self-efficacy in learners. From the perspective of sub-factors, there was coherence among the factors assessing self-emotions, evaluating others' emotions, and utilizing emotions in the ability model. However, the emotional regulation factor lost its items' distribution across the first and second factors, indicating that an individual's evaluation of others' emotions depends heavily on emotional experience and awareness.","PeriodicalId":212766,"journal":{"name":"Port Said Journal of Educational Research","volume":"1 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation Study of Emotional Intelligence Structure according to the Ability and Traits Perspectives among University Students\",\"authors\":\"Hadya Adel Abdelrehim, Mahmoud Ali Moussa\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/psjer.2024.265051.1033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to evaluate emotional intelligence (EI) models in Egyptian university students, focusing on the abilities and traits of 280 senior students at Suez Canal University. The researchers used descriptive and comparative causal approaches and used the BEIS-10 modified scale and the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue-30) to test both the general factor perspective and the sub-factors. The results of the two-factor model revealed that the items of EI loaded on one single factor, while most of the traits model items loaded on two factors. This implies that ability serves as the core for emotional thinking, emphasizing the necessity of emotional self-efficacy in learners. From the perspective of sub-factors, there was coherence among the factors assessing self-emotions, evaluating others' emotions, and utilizing emotions in the ability model. However, the emotional regulation factor lost its items' distribution across the first and second factors, indicating that an individual's evaluation of others' emotions depends heavily on emotional experience and awareness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Port Said Journal of Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"1 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Port Said Journal of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/psjer.2024.265051.1033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Port Said Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/psjer.2024.265051.1033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估埃及大学生的情商(EI)模型,重点是苏伊士运河大学 280 名高年级学生的能力和特质。研究人员采用了描述性和比较因果关系的方法,并使用 BEIS-10 修正量表和特质情商问卷(TEIQue-30)对总因子视角和子因子进行了测试。双因素模型的结果表明,情商的项目加载在一个单一因素上,而特质模型的大多数项目加载在两个因素上。这意味着能力是情感思维的核心,强调了学习者情感自我效能感的必要性。从子因子的角度来看,能力模型中的自我情绪评估因子、他人情绪评估因子和情绪利用因子之间存在一致性。然而,情绪调节因子在第一因子和第二因子中失去了项目分布,这表明个体对他人情绪的评价在很大程度上取决于情绪体验和意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation Study of Emotional Intelligence Structure according to the Ability and Traits Perspectives among University Students
The study aimed to evaluate emotional intelligence (EI) models in Egyptian university students, focusing on the abilities and traits of 280 senior students at Suez Canal University. The researchers used descriptive and comparative causal approaches and used the BEIS-10 modified scale and the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue-30) to test both the general factor perspective and the sub-factors. The results of the two-factor model revealed that the items of EI loaded on one single factor, while most of the traits model items loaded on two factors. This implies that ability serves as the core for emotional thinking, emphasizing the necessity of emotional self-efficacy in learners. From the perspective of sub-factors, there was coherence among the factors assessing self-emotions, evaluating others' emotions, and utilizing emotions in the ability model. However, the emotional regulation factor lost its items' distribution across the first and second factors, indicating that an individual's evaluation of others' emotions depends heavily on emotional experience and awareness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信