使用新解释标准 2022 对肺活量进行功能分类的变化:一项多中心研究

IF 8.7 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Santiago C. Arce , Carlos Aguirre-Franco , Patricia Schonffeldt-Guerrero , Cecilia Rodríguez-Flores , Laura Gochicoa-Rangel
{"title":"使用新解释标准 2022 对肺活量进行功能分类的变化:一项多中心研究","authors":"Santiago C. Arce ,&nbsp;Carlos Aguirre-Franco ,&nbsp;Patricia Schonffeldt-Guerrero ,&nbsp;Cecilia Rodríguez-Flores ,&nbsp;Laura Gochicoa-Rangel","doi":"10.1016/j.arbres.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pulmonary function tests are vital for diagnosing lung diseases, assessing treatment responses, and monitoring respiratory health. Recent updates to interpretive standards by the European Respiratory and American Thoracic Societies (ERS/ATS) in 2022 introduced significant changes compared to the 2005 standards. They include incorporating lung volume measurements, non-specific and mixed disorders, introducing <em>z</em>-scores for functional abnormality assessment, reducing severity categories from five to three, and revising criteria for positive bronchodilator responses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective, multi-center study across four centers using spirometric data spanning from 2002 to 2022. We categorized spirometry results using both the 2005 and 2022 ATS/ERS standards and calculated predicted values following the GLI 2012 equation (Caucasian subset).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 79,039 subjects, we observed that 23% shifted from an obstructive diagnosis under the 2005 standard to a mixed pattern diagnosis under the 2022 standard, necessitating lung volume assessments. In the evaluation of bronchodilator responses among 59,203 tests, 12.3% of those initially classified as responders were reclassified as non-responders with the new standards. We found variations in severity categorization across age groups, with older patients tending to receive milder severity classifications and younger individuals receiving greater severity classifications under the 2022 standards.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The 2022 document emphasizes early lung volume assessment, potentially leading to increased utilization of more complex tests. Furthermore, the bronchodilator response was predominant in extreme age groups and among individuals with milder spirometric impairments. This shift may impact treatment decisions, potentially initiating medication in milder cases and de-escalating treatment in more severe cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8339,"journal":{"name":"Archivos De Bronconeumologia","volume":"61 2","pages":"Pages 76-81"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in the Functional Classification of Spirometry Using the New Interpretation Standard 2022: A Multicenter Study\",\"authors\":\"Santiago C. Arce ,&nbsp;Carlos Aguirre-Franco ,&nbsp;Patricia Schonffeldt-Guerrero ,&nbsp;Cecilia Rodríguez-Flores ,&nbsp;Laura Gochicoa-Rangel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arbres.2024.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pulmonary function tests are vital for diagnosing lung diseases, assessing treatment responses, and monitoring respiratory health. Recent updates to interpretive standards by the European Respiratory and American Thoracic Societies (ERS/ATS) in 2022 introduced significant changes compared to the 2005 standards. They include incorporating lung volume measurements, non-specific and mixed disorders, introducing <em>z</em>-scores for functional abnormality assessment, reducing severity categories from five to three, and revising criteria for positive bronchodilator responses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective, multi-center study across four centers using spirometric data spanning from 2002 to 2022. We categorized spirometry results using both the 2005 and 2022 ATS/ERS standards and calculated predicted values following the GLI 2012 equation (Caucasian subset).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 79,039 subjects, we observed that 23% shifted from an obstructive diagnosis under the 2005 standard to a mixed pattern diagnosis under the 2022 standard, necessitating lung volume assessments. In the evaluation of bronchodilator responses among 59,203 tests, 12.3% of those initially classified as responders were reclassified as non-responders with the new standards. We found variations in severity categorization across age groups, with older patients tending to receive milder severity classifications and younger individuals receiving greater severity classifications under the 2022 standards.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The 2022 document emphasizes early lung volume assessment, potentially leading to increased utilization of more complex tests. Furthermore, the bronchodilator response was predominant in extreme age groups and among individuals with milder spirometric impairments. This shift may impact treatment decisions, potentially initiating medication in milder cases and de-escalating treatment in more severe cases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos De Bronconeumologia\",\"volume\":\"61 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 76-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos De Bronconeumologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300289624002473\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos De Bronconeumologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300289624002473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺功能测试对于诊断肺部疾病、评估治疗反应和监测呼吸系统健康至关重要。欧洲呼吸和美国胸科学会(ERS/ATS)最近在2022年更新了解释性标准,与2005年的标准相比,进行了重大修改。它们包括合并肺容量测量、非特异性和混合性疾病、引入功能异常评估的z分数、将严重程度类别从5个减少到3个,以及修订支气管扩张剂阳性反应的标准。方法采用2002年至2022年的肺活量测量数据,在四个中心进行了回顾性多中心研究。我们使用2005年和2022年ATS/ERS标准对肺活量测定结果进行分类,并根据GLI 2012方程(高加索子集)计算预测值。结果在79039名受试者中,我们观察到23%的受试者从2005年标准下的阻塞性诊断转变为2022年标准下的混合模式诊断,需要进行肺容量评估。在59,203例试验中对支气管扩张剂反应的评估中,根据新标准,最初被归类为反应者的12.3%被重新归类为无反应者。我们发现不同年龄组的严重程度分类存在差异,在2022年标准下,老年患者倾向于接受较轻的严重程度分类,而年轻人倾向于接受较严重的严重程度分类。2022年文件强调早期肺容量评估,可能导致更复杂测试的使用增加。此外,支气管扩张剂反应在极端年龄组和呼吸功能损伤较轻的个体中占主导地位。这种转变可能会影响治疗决策,可能会在较轻的病例中启动药物治疗,而在较严重的病例中降低治疗水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Changes in the Functional Classification of Spirometry Using the New Interpretation Standard 2022: A Multicenter Study

Changes in the Functional Classification of Spirometry Using the New Interpretation Standard 2022: A Multicenter Study

Introduction

Pulmonary function tests are vital for diagnosing lung diseases, assessing treatment responses, and monitoring respiratory health. Recent updates to interpretive standards by the European Respiratory and American Thoracic Societies (ERS/ATS) in 2022 introduced significant changes compared to the 2005 standards. They include incorporating lung volume measurements, non-specific and mixed disorders, introducing z-scores for functional abnormality assessment, reducing severity categories from five to three, and revising criteria for positive bronchodilator responses.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, multi-center study across four centers using spirometric data spanning from 2002 to 2022. We categorized spirometry results using both the 2005 and 2022 ATS/ERS standards and calculated predicted values following the GLI 2012 equation (Caucasian subset).

Results

Among 79,039 subjects, we observed that 23% shifted from an obstructive diagnosis under the 2005 standard to a mixed pattern diagnosis under the 2022 standard, necessitating lung volume assessments. In the evaluation of bronchodilator responses among 59,203 tests, 12.3% of those initially classified as responders were reclassified as non-responders with the new standards. We found variations in severity categorization across age groups, with older patients tending to receive milder severity classifications and younger individuals receiving greater severity classifications under the 2022 standards.

Conclusions

The 2022 document emphasizes early lung volume assessment, potentially leading to increased utilization of more complex tests. Furthermore, the bronchodilator response was predominant in extreme age groups and among individuals with milder spirometric impairments. This shift may impact treatment decisions, potentially initiating medication in milder cases and de-escalating treatment in more severe cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos De Bronconeumologia
Archivos De Bronconeumologia Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
17.50%
发文量
330
审稿时长
14 days
期刊介绍: Archivos de Bronconeumologia is a scientific journal that specializes in publishing prospective original research articles focusing on various aspects of respiratory diseases, including epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical practice, surgery, and basic investigation. Additionally, the journal features other types of articles such as reviews, editorials, special articles of interest to the society and editorial board, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and clinical images. Published monthly, the journal comprises 12 regular issues along with occasional supplements containing articles from different sections. All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo rigorous evaluation by the editors and are subjected to expert peer review. The editorial team, led by the Editor and/or an Associate Editor, manages the peer-review process. Archivos de Bronconeumologia is published monthly in English, facilitating broad dissemination of the latest research findings in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信