在感染性全髋关节置换术的两阶段翻修中使用铰接式抗生素加载预设计垫片:回顾性长期结果研究

Sayantan Saha, Azeem Ahmed, Rama Mohan, Zain Habib
{"title":"在感染性全髋关节置换术的两阶段翻修中使用铰接式抗生素加载预设计垫片:回顾性长期结果研究","authors":"Sayantan Saha,&nbsp;Azeem Ahmed,&nbsp;Rama Mohan,&nbsp;Zain Habib","doi":"10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>With the increasing number of total hip arthroplasties performed across the world, there is a noted rise in the number of prosthetic joint infections. Two-staged revisions are the most accepted interventions for these. There are two forms of interim antibiotic spacers - hand-made and prefabricated. There is paucity of long-term data to support the use of the latter. The purpose of our retrospective study was to analyse the long-term results of the same.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Out of 45 patients treated by two-staged revision for prosthetic hip joint infections, 31 underwent implantation of prefabricated antibiotic-loaded spacer in the first stage (June 2011–October 2020). The primary objective was to determine the recurrence rate of infection, and secondary objectives were analysis of outcome, time for infection eradication, and review of complications encountered. Minimal follow-up was 1 year and maximum was 8 years (mean 48.02 months).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>29 patients underwent both the stages of the revision procedure. None had infection recurrence. 2 died before the second stage. Long term (5 years) mortality was 8.6 %. Mean interval between the 1st and 2nd stage surgeries was 16.5 weeks. 2 patients had spacer dislocations; one required an open reduction. 1 patient had a fracture during the 2nd stage, and 3 had dislocations after the 2nd stage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Prefabricated antibiotic loaded spacer remains a promising option in dealing with prosthetic hip joint infections. Our experience and long-term follow-up results depicts low complication rate of the procedure whilst facilitating long-term infection control and nil infection recurrence rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001371/pdfft?md5=1bdd840978670ceaf5d1b241ee4d4ddf&pid=1-s2.0-S2773157X24001371-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of articulating antibiotic loaded pre-designed spacer in two-staged revisions for infected total hip arthroplasties: A retrospective long-term outcome study\",\"authors\":\"Sayantan Saha,&nbsp;Azeem Ahmed,&nbsp;Rama Mohan,&nbsp;Zain Habib\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>With the increasing number of total hip arthroplasties performed across the world, there is a noted rise in the number of prosthetic joint infections. Two-staged revisions are the most accepted interventions for these. There are two forms of interim antibiotic spacers - hand-made and prefabricated. There is paucity of long-term data to support the use of the latter. The purpose of our retrospective study was to analyse the long-term results of the same.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Out of 45 patients treated by two-staged revision for prosthetic hip joint infections, 31 underwent implantation of prefabricated antibiotic-loaded spacer in the first stage (June 2011–October 2020). The primary objective was to determine the recurrence rate of infection, and secondary objectives were analysis of outcome, time for infection eradication, and review of complications encountered. Minimal follow-up was 1 year and maximum was 8 years (mean 48.02 months).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>29 patients underwent both the stages of the revision procedure. None had infection recurrence. 2 died before the second stage. Long term (5 years) mortality was 8.6 %. Mean interval between the 1st and 2nd stage surgeries was 16.5 weeks. 2 patients had spacer dislocations; one required an open reduction. 1 patient had a fracture during the 2nd stage, and 3 had dislocations after the 2nd stage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Prefabricated antibiotic loaded spacer remains a promising option in dealing with prosthetic hip joint infections. Our experience and long-term follow-up results depicts low complication rate of the procedure whilst facilitating long-term infection control and nil infection recurrence rate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001371/pdfft?md5=1bdd840978670ceaf5d1b241ee4d4ddf&pid=1-s2.0-S2773157X24001371-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景随着全球全髋关节置换术的数量不断增加,假体关节感染的数量也明显上升。两阶段翻修是目前最被接受的治疗方法。临时抗生素垫片有两种形式--手工制造和预制。支持使用后者的长期数据很少。我们的回顾性研究旨在分析其长期效果。方法在45例接受两阶段翻修治疗的人工髋关节感染患者中,31例在第一阶段(2011年6月至2020年10月)植入了预制抗生素垫片。首要目标是确定感染的复发率,次要目标是分析结果、感染根除时间和并发症回顾。随访时间最短为 1 年,最长为 8 年(平均 48.02 个月)。结果 29 名患者接受了两个阶段的翻修手术,无一感染复发。2 人在第二阶段手术前死亡。长期(5 年)死亡率为 8.6%。第一和第二阶段手术的平均间隔时间为 16.5 周。2名患者出现间隔器脱位,其中1人需要开刀复位。结论预制抗生素垫片仍然是治疗人工髋关节感染的一种很有前景的选择。我们的经验和长期随访结果表明,该手术并发症发生率低,同时有利于长期感染控制,无感染复发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of articulating antibiotic loaded pre-designed spacer in two-staged revisions for infected total hip arthroplasties: A retrospective long-term outcome study

Background

With the increasing number of total hip arthroplasties performed across the world, there is a noted rise in the number of prosthetic joint infections. Two-staged revisions are the most accepted interventions for these. There are two forms of interim antibiotic spacers - hand-made and prefabricated. There is paucity of long-term data to support the use of the latter. The purpose of our retrospective study was to analyse the long-term results of the same.

Methods

Out of 45 patients treated by two-staged revision for prosthetic hip joint infections, 31 underwent implantation of prefabricated antibiotic-loaded spacer in the first stage (June 2011–October 2020). The primary objective was to determine the recurrence rate of infection, and secondary objectives were analysis of outcome, time for infection eradication, and review of complications encountered. Minimal follow-up was 1 year and maximum was 8 years (mean 48.02 months).

Results

29 patients underwent both the stages of the revision procedure. None had infection recurrence. 2 died before the second stage. Long term (5 years) mortality was 8.6 %. Mean interval between the 1st and 2nd stage surgeries was 16.5 weeks. 2 patients had spacer dislocations; one required an open reduction. 1 patient had a fracture during the 2nd stage, and 3 had dislocations after the 2nd stage.

Conclusion

Prefabricated antibiotic loaded spacer remains a promising option in dealing with prosthetic hip joint infections. Our experience and long-term follow-up results depicts low complication rate of the procedure whilst facilitating long-term infection control and nil infection recurrence rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信