利用实验室超高速撞击实验进行形状参数化的方法

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
John H. Seago , Heather Cowardin , Phillip Anz-Meador , Alyssa Manis , Joshua Miller , Eric Christiansen
{"title":"利用实验室超高速撞击实验进行形状参数化的方法","authors":"John H. Seago ,&nbsp;Heather Cowardin ,&nbsp;Phillip Anz-Meador ,&nbsp;Alyssa Manis ,&nbsp;Joshua Miller ,&nbsp;Eric Christiansen","doi":"10.1016/j.jsse.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office relies on laboratory-based impact tests to supplement the measurement data of on-orbit events that define the orbital debris environment. These experiments deliver information that is essential to interpreting the radar and optical measurements of orbital fragmentation events into useful metrics, such as characteristic size, and to providing a better understanding of the distributions of fragment populations in terms of their masses, material constituents, fragment densities, cross-sectional areas, area-to-mass ratios, shapes, </span><em>etc</em><span>. The Satellite Orbital Debris Characterization Impact Test was a notable laboratory impact experiment conducted in 1992 using a surplus U.S.<span> Navy Transit navigation satellite of the 1960s. The data from this ground-based experiment were combined with on-orbit measurements to develop the NASA Standard Satellite Breakup Model (SSBM). To account for advancements in satellite design and construction since, a new impact test series – DebriSat – was conducted in 2014. This test utilized a high-fidelity mock-up spacecraft that better represents the materials and construction techniques used to design and manufacture modern spacecraft. Together, these tests offer valuable data to model an orbital debris environment composed of legacy and modern spacecraft. This paper presents an overview of the two laboratory impact tests, comparing their fragment parameter distributions with each other and with relevant distributions from the NASA SSBM. The categorization and descriptions of fragment shapes are of significant interest for future work, yet there are marked differences in the definitions of shape categories, categorizations of constituent materials, and the measurement techniques employed to populate these two datasets. New rubrics simplify and equate the categorizations between datasets to aid comparative analyses and to facilitate the potential use of both datasets in tandem with future environmental debris models. A preferred approach to classifying shape across disparate datasets uses the characteristic-length dimensions, and a simplified shape classification based on physical, solid-body dimensions, to mathematically construct an encapsulating right-circular cylinder that represents the fragment. The ratio of cylinder length-to-diameter (</span></span><em>L:D</em><span>) then provides a single continuum value for shape that is strongly correlated with its designated shape and size. This metric can then be used to further assess the distribution of shape with populations of other fragment characteristics within these datasets. The shape parameterization using the </span><em>L:D</em> ratios of right-circular cylinders is discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An approach to shape parameterization using laboratory hypervelocity impact experiments\",\"authors\":\"John H. Seago ,&nbsp;Heather Cowardin ,&nbsp;Phillip Anz-Meador ,&nbsp;Alyssa Manis ,&nbsp;Joshua Miller ,&nbsp;Eric Christiansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsse.2024.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><span>NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office relies on laboratory-based impact tests to supplement the measurement data of on-orbit events that define the orbital debris environment. These experiments deliver information that is essential to interpreting the radar and optical measurements of orbital fragmentation events into useful metrics, such as characteristic size, and to providing a better understanding of the distributions of fragment populations in terms of their masses, material constituents, fragment densities, cross-sectional areas, area-to-mass ratios, shapes, </span><em>etc</em><span>. The Satellite Orbital Debris Characterization Impact Test was a notable laboratory impact experiment conducted in 1992 using a surplus U.S.<span> Navy Transit navigation satellite of the 1960s. The data from this ground-based experiment were combined with on-orbit measurements to develop the NASA Standard Satellite Breakup Model (SSBM). To account for advancements in satellite design and construction since, a new impact test series – DebriSat – was conducted in 2014. This test utilized a high-fidelity mock-up spacecraft that better represents the materials and construction techniques used to design and manufacture modern spacecraft. Together, these tests offer valuable data to model an orbital debris environment composed of legacy and modern spacecraft. This paper presents an overview of the two laboratory impact tests, comparing their fragment parameter distributions with each other and with relevant distributions from the NASA SSBM. The categorization and descriptions of fragment shapes are of significant interest for future work, yet there are marked differences in the definitions of shape categories, categorizations of constituent materials, and the measurement techniques employed to populate these two datasets. New rubrics simplify and equate the categorizations between datasets to aid comparative analyses and to facilitate the potential use of both datasets in tandem with future environmental debris models. A preferred approach to classifying shape across disparate datasets uses the characteristic-length dimensions, and a simplified shape classification based on physical, solid-body dimensions, to mathematically construct an encapsulating right-circular cylinder that represents the fragment. The ratio of cylinder length-to-diameter (</span></span><em>L:D</em><span>) then provides a single continuum value for shape that is strongly correlated with its designated shape and size. This metric can then be used to further assess the distribution of shape with populations of other fragment characteristics within these datasets. The shape parameterization using the </span><em>L:D</em> ratios of right-circular cylinders is discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246889672400065X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246889672400065X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国航天局的轨道碎片方案办公室依靠实验室撞击试验来补充确定轨道碎片环境的在轨事件测量数据。这些实验提供的信息对于将轨道碎片事件的雷达和光学测量结果解释为有用的指标(如特征尺寸)以及更好地了解碎片群在质量、材料成分、碎片密度、横截面积、面积与质量比、形状等方面的分布情况至关重要。卫星轨道碎片特征撞击试验是 1992 年利用美国海军 20 世纪 60 年代剩余的 Transit 导航卫星进行的一次引人注目的实验室撞击试验。这项地面实验的数据与在轨测量数据相结合,开发出了 NASA 标准卫星破裂模型(SSBM)。为了考虑到卫星设计和建造方面的进步,2014 年进行了新的撞击测试系列--DebriSat。该测试使用了高保真模拟航天器,更好地体现了设计和制造现代航天器所使用的材料和建造技术。这些测试为模拟由传统和现代航天器组成的轨道碎片环境提供了宝贵的数据。本文概述了这两项实验室撞击试验,比较了彼此的碎片参数分布以及美国航天局 SSBM 的相关分布。碎片形状的分类和描述对未来工作具有重要意义,但在形状类别的定义、组成材料的分类以及填充这两个数据集所采用的测量技术方面存在明显差异。新的标准简化并等同于数据集之间的分类,以帮助进行比较分析,并促进这两个数据集在未来环境碎片模型中的潜在使用。对不同数据集进行形状分类的首选方法是使用特征长度尺寸和基于物理实体尺寸的简化形状分类,以数学方法构建一个代表碎片的封装直圆柱体。圆柱体长度与直径之比(L:D)为形状提供了一个单一的连续值,该值与其指定的形状和尺寸密切相关。这一指标可用于进一步评估这些数据集中其他碎片特征的形状分布。本文讨论了使用直圆柱体的 L:D 比值进行形状参数化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An approach to shape parameterization using laboratory hypervelocity impact experiments
NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office relies on laboratory-based impact tests to supplement the measurement data of on-orbit events that define the orbital debris environment. These experiments deliver information that is essential to interpreting the radar and optical measurements of orbital fragmentation events into useful metrics, such as characteristic size, and to providing a better understanding of the distributions of fragment populations in terms of their masses, material constituents, fragment densities, cross-sectional areas, area-to-mass ratios, shapes, etc. The Satellite Orbital Debris Characterization Impact Test was a notable laboratory impact experiment conducted in 1992 using a surplus U.S. Navy Transit navigation satellite of the 1960s. The data from this ground-based experiment were combined with on-orbit measurements to develop the NASA Standard Satellite Breakup Model (SSBM). To account for advancements in satellite design and construction since, a new impact test series – DebriSat – was conducted in 2014. This test utilized a high-fidelity mock-up spacecraft that better represents the materials and construction techniques used to design and manufacture modern spacecraft. Together, these tests offer valuable data to model an orbital debris environment composed of legacy and modern spacecraft. This paper presents an overview of the two laboratory impact tests, comparing their fragment parameter distributions with each other and with relevant distributions from the NASA SSBM. The categorization and descriptions of fragment shapes are of significant interest for future work, yet there are marked differences in the definitions of shape categories, categorizations of constituent materials, and the measurement techniques employed to populate these two datasets. New rubrics simplify and equate the categorizations between datasets to aid comparative analyses and to facilitate the potential use of both datasets in tandem with future environmental debris models. A preferred approach to classifying shape across disparate datasets uses the characteristic-length dimensions, and a simplified shape classification based on physical, solid-body dimensions, to mathematically construct an encapsulating right-circular cylinder that represents the fragment. The ratio of cylinder length-to-diameter (L:D) then provides a single continuum value for shape that is strongly correlated with its designated shape and size. This metric can then be used to further assess the distribution of shape with populations of other fragment characteristics within these datasets. The shape parameterization using the L:D ratios of right-circular cylinders is discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信