育儿假中的同伴效应:意大利的证据

IF 2.2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Davide Dottori , Francesca Modena , Giulia Martina Tanzi
{"title":"育儿假中的同伴效应:意大利的证据","authors":"Davide Dottori ,&nbsp;Francesca Modena ,&nbsp;Giulia Martina Tanzi","doi":"10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper we estimate peer effects<span> in parental leave (PL), analyzing whether mothers’ choices may be influenced by prior decisions made by their female colleagues. We identify peer effects through an exogenous variation in the probability that peers take a PL driven by a reform implemented in Italy in 2015 which extended the time period over which parents can receive a paid PL, providing greater flexibility in its use. We focus on post-reform mothers and exploit the heterogeneity in the share of their peers who, due to their children’s age, have been affected by the reform. Our findings show the existence of important peer effects: a 10 percentage point increase in the share of peers that took a PL in response to the reform results in mothers being 2.4 percentage points more likely to take a PL. We also find a positive effect on the amount of PL taken and a negative effect on the probability of working part-time. As suggested by the heterogeneity analysis, the peer effects seem to be particularly evident for mothers with a low tenure in the firm and in workplaces characterized by strong interactions among the colleagues.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48153,"journal":{"name":"Labour Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer effects in parental leave: Evidence from Italy\",\"authors\":\"Davide Dottori ,&nbsp;Francesca Modena ,&nbsp;Giulia Martina Tanzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper we estimate peer effects<span> in parental leave (PL), analyzing whether mothers’ choices may be influenced by prior decisions made by their female colleagues. We identify peer effects through an exogenous variation in the probability that peers take a PL driven by a reform implemented in Italy in 2015 which extended the time period over which parents can receive a paid PL, providing greater flexibility in its use. We focus on post-reform mothers and exploit the heterogeneity in the share of their peers who, due to their children’s age, have been affected by the reform. Our findings show the existence of important peer effects: a 10 percentage point increase in the share of peers that took a PL in response to the reform results in mothers being 2.4 percentage points more likely to take a PL. We also find a positive effect on the amount of PL taken and a negative effect on the probability of working part-time. As suggested by the heterogeneity analysis, the peer effects seem to be particularly evident for mothers with a low tenure in the firm and in workplaces characterized by strong interactions among the colleagues.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labour Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labour Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537124000952\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537124000952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们估算了育儿假(PL)中的同伴效应,分析了母亲的选择是否会受到其女性同事先前决定的影响。2015 年,意大利实施了一项改革,延长了父母享受带薪育儿假的时间,为育儿假的使用提供了更大的灵活性。我们将重点放在改革后的母亲身上,并利用她们的同龄人因子女年龄而受改革影响的异质性。我们的研究结果表明存在着重要的同伴效应:因改革而参加 PL 的同伴比例每增加 10 个百分点,母亲参加 PL 的可能性就会增加 2.4 个百分点。我们还发现,参加 PL 的人数会产生正效应,而参加兼职工作的概率会产生负效应。正如异质性分析所显示的那样,同侪效应似乎对在公司任职时间较短的母亲和同事之间互动较强的工作场所尤为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peer effects in parental leave: Evidence from Italy

In this paper we estimate peer effects in parental leave (PL), analyzing whether mothers’ choices may be influenced by prior decisions made by their female colleagues. We identify peer effects through an exogenous variation in the probability that peers take a PL driven by a reform implemented in Italy in 2015 which extended the time period over which parents can receive a paid PL, providing greater flexibility in its use. We focus on post-reform mothers and exploit the heterogeneity in the share of their peers who, due to their children’s age, have been affected by the reform. Our findings show the existence of important peer effects: a 10 percentage point increase in the share of peers that took a PL in response to the reform results in mothers being 2.4 percentage points more likely to take a PL. We also find a positive effect on the amount of PL taken and a negative effect on the probability of working part-time. As suggested by the heterogeneity analysis, the peer effects seem to be particularly evident for mothers with a low tenure in the firm and in workplaces characterized by strong interactions among the colleagues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Labour Economics
Labour Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: Labour Economics is devoted to publishing research in the field of labour economics both on the microeconomic and on the macroeconomic level, in a balanced mix of theory, empirical testing and policy applications. It gives due recognition to analysis and explanation of institutional arrangements of national labour markets and the impact of these institutions on labour market outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信