数字导向与分析师建议:来自中国的证据

IF 5.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Di Zhu, Xiao Zhang, Jie Wang
{"title":"数字导向与分析师建议:来自中国的证据","authors":"Di Zhu,&nbsp;Xiao Zhang,&nbsp;Jie Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10490-024-09976-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Because of information asymmetry in the capital market, analysts find it difficult to obtain accurate internal information of the enterprise and usually only rely on signals conveyed by firms to predict firms’ value and future development trends. Previous researchers have focused more on the impact of signals about quality on analyst recommendations and ignored the impact of signals about intent. Based on signaling theory, we study how digital orientation, a typical signal about intent in the digital economy era, affects analyst recommendations; we also explore how three dimensions: dynamism, complexity, and munificence from a signaling environment perspective affect the signaling process. Using a mixed-methods approach and in the unique context of the Chinese digital economy, we find that the digital orientation can increase the analyst recommendations. Industrial uncertainty and industrial digital heterogeneity both strengthen the positive effect of digital orientation on analyst recommendations. On the contrary, industrial growth weakens the positive effect of digital orientation on analyst recommendations. This study provides new insights for understanding the transmission of firm signals about intent and the evaluation of external stakeholders in the era of the digital economy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8474,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","volume":"42 3","pages":"1683 - 1716"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital orientation and analyst recommendations: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Di Zhu,&nbsp;Xiao Zhang,&nbsp;Jie Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10490-024-09976-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Because of information asymmetry in the capital market, analysts find it difficult to obtain accurate internal information of the enterprise and usually only rely on signals conveyed by firms to predict firms’ value and future development trends. Previous researchers have focused more on the impact of signals about quality on analyst recommendations and ignored the impact of signals about intent. Based on signaling theory, we study how digital orientation, a typical signal about intent in the digital economy era, affects analyst recommendations; we also explore how three dimensions: dynamism, complexity, and munificence from a signaling environment perspective affect the signaling process. Using a mixed-methods approach and in the unique context of the Chinese digital economy, we find that the digital orientation can increase the analyst recommendations. Industrial uncertainty and industrial digital heterogeneity both strengthen the positive effect of digital orientation on analyst recommendations. On the contrary, industrial growth weakens the positive effect of digital orientation on analyst recommendations. This study provides new insights for understanding the transmission of firm signals about intent and the evaluation of external stakeholders in the era of the digital economy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"1683 - 1716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10490-024-09976-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10490-024-09976-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于资本市场的信息不对称,分析师很难获得准确的企业内部信息,通常只能依靠企业传递的信号来预测企业的价值和未来的发展趋势。以前的研究人员更多地关注质量信号对分析师建议的影响,而忽略了意图信号的影响。基于信号理论,本文研究了数字经济时代典型的意向信号——数字取向对分析师建议的影响;我们还从信号环境的角度探讨了三个维度:动态性、复杂性和慷慨性如何影响信号传递过程。采用混合方法,在中国数字经济的独特背景下,我们发现数字化取向可以增加分析师的推荐。产业不确定性和产业数字化异质性都强化了数字化导向对分析师建议的正向作用。相反,行业增长削弱了数字化导向对分析师推荐的积极作用。本研究为理解数字经济时代企业意图信号的传递和外部利益相关者的评估提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital orientation and analyst recommendations: Evidence from China

Because of information asymmetry in the capital market, analysts find it difficult to obtain accurate internal information of the enterprise and usually only rely on signals conveyed by firms to predict firms’ value and future development trends. Previous researchers have focused more on the impact of signals about quality on analyst recommendations and ignored the impact of signals about intent. Based on signaling theory, we study how digital orientation, a typical signal about intent in the digital economy era, affects analyst recommendations; we also explore how three dimensions: dynamism, complexity, and munificence from a signaling environment perspective affect the signaling process. Using a mixed-methods approach and in the unique context of the Chinese digital economy, we find that the digital orientation can increase the analyst recommendations. Industrial uncertainty and industrial digital heterogeneity both strengthen the positive effect of digital orientation on analyst recommendations. On the contrary, industrial growth weakens the positive effect of digital orientation on analyst recommendations. This study provides new insights for understanding the transmission of firm signals about intent and the evaluation of external stakeholders in the era of the digital economy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Journal of Management publishes original manuscripts on management and organizational research in the Asia Pacific region, encompassing Pacific Rim countries and mainland Asia. APJM focuses on the extent to which each manuscript addresses matters that pertain to the most fundamental question: “What determines organization success?” The major academic disciplines that we cover include entrepreneurship, human resource management, international business, organizational behavior, and strategic management. However, manuscripts that belong to other well-established disciplines such as accounting, economics, finance, marketing, and operations generally do not fall into the scope of APJM. We endeavor to be the major vehicle for exchange of ideas and research among management scholars within or interested in the broadly defined Asia Pacific region.Key features include: Rigor - maintained through strict review processes, high quality global reviewers, and Editorial Advisory and Review Boards comprising prominent researchers from many countries. Relevance - maintained by its focus on key management and organizational trends in the region. Uniqueness - being the first and most prominent management journal published in and about the fastest growing region in the world. Official affiliation - Asia Academy of ManagementFor more information, visit the AAOM website:www.baf.cuhk.edu.hk/asia-aom/ Officially cited as: Asia Pac J Manag
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信