评估不同子宫肌瘤切除术的疗效和并发症

IF 0.8 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Pranshi Asati, Swati Asati, Varsha Sinha, Heena Dixit, Akriti Mahajan, Yasser Khalid Alraddadi, Afroz Kalmee Syed
{"title":"评估不同子宫肌瘤切除术的疗效和并发症","authors":"Pranshi Asati, Swati Asati, Varsha Sinha, Heena Dixit, Akriti Mahajan, Yasser Khalid Alraddadi, Afroz Kalmee Syed","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_236_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Uterine fibroids, which are benign tumors affecting a significant proportion of women, often necessitate hysterectomy for suggestive relief. Understanding the relative efficiency and safety profiles of different techniques is crucial for optimizing patient care.\n \n \n \n This prospective cohort study enrolled women diagnosed with symptomatic uterine fibroids who underwent hysterectomy. Surgical techniques included “total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH)”, “laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH)”, and “vaginal hysterectomy (VH)”. Efficacy outcomes included operative time, blood loss, and recurrence rates, while complications encompassed intraoperative and postoperative adverse events.\n \n \n \n Laparoscopic hysterectomy demonstrated the shortest operative time and least blood loss compared with TAH and VH. Total abdominal hysterectomy had the highest rates of both intraoperative and postoperative complications, followed by LH and VH. Recurrence rates were comparable among the three techniques.\n \n \n \n Laparoscopic hysterectomy offers advantages in operative efficiency and complication rates compared with total abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy techniques.\n","PeriodicalId":16824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Efficacy and Complications of Different Hysterectomy Techniques in the Management of Uterine Fibroids\",\"authors\":\"Pranshi Asati, Swati Asati, Varsha Sinha, Heena Dixit, Akriti Mahajan, Yasser Khalid Alraddadi, Afroz Kalmee Syed\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_236_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n \\n \\n \\n Uterine fibroids, which are benign tumors affecting a significant proportion of women, often necessitate hysterectomy for suggestive relief. Understanding the relative efficiency and safety profiles of different techniques is crucial for optimizing patient care.\\n \\n \\n \\n This prospective cohort study enrolled women diagnosed with symptomatic uterine fibroids who underwent hysterectomy. Surgical techniques included “total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH)”, “laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH)”, and “vaginal hysterectomy (VH)”. Efficacy outcomes included operative time, blood loss, and recurrence rates, while complications encompassed intraoperative and postoperative adverse events.\\n \\n \\n \\n Laparoscopic hysterectomy demonstrated the shortest operative time and least blood loss compared with TAH and VH. Total abdominal hysterectomy had the highest rates of both intraoperative and postoperative complications, followed by LH and VH. Recurrence rates were comparable among the three techniques.\\n \\n \\n \\n Laparoscopic hysterectomy offers advantages in operative efficiency and complication rates compared with total abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy techniques.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_236_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_236_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 子宫肌瘤是一种良性肿瘤,影响着相当一部分女性,通常需要切除子宫才能缓解症状。了解不同技术的相对效率和安全性对于优化患者护理至关重要。 这项前瞻性队列研究招募了确诊为无症状子宫肌瘤并接受子宫切除术的女性。手术技术包括 "全腹子宫切除术(TAH)"、"腹腔镜子宫切除术(LH)"和 "阴道子宫切除术(VH)"。疗效包括手术时间、失血量和复发率,并发症包括术中和术后不良事件。 与 TAH 和 VH 相比,腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术时间最短,失血量最少。全腹子宫切除术的术中和术后并发症发生率最高,其次是LH和VH。三种技术的复发率相当。 与全腹和阴道子宫切除术相比,腹腔镜子宫切除术在手术效率和并发症发生率方面更具优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Complications of Different Hysterectomy Techniques in the Management of Uterine Fibroids
ABSTRACT Uterine fibroids, which are benign tumors affecting a significant proportion of women, often necessitate hysterectomy for suggestive relief. Understanding the relative efficiency and safety profiles of different techniques is crucial for optimizing patient care. This prospective cohort study enrolled women diagnosed with symptomatic uterine fibroids who underwent hysterectomy. Surgical techniques included “total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH)”, “laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH)”, and “vaginal hysterectomy (VH)”. Efficacy outcomes included operative time, blood loss, and recurrence rates, while complications encompassed intraoperative and postoperative adverse events. Laparoscopic hysterectomy demonstrated the shortest operative time and least blood loss compared with TAH and VH. Total abdominal hysterectomy had the highest rates of both intraoperative and postoperative complications, followed by LH and VH. Recurrence rates were comparable among the three techniques. Laparoscopic hysterectomy offers advantages in operative efficiency and complication rates compared with total abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is a Quarterly multidisciplinary open access biomedical journal. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is an international medium of interaction between scientist, academicians and industrial personnel’s.JPBS is now offial publication of OPUBS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信