外阴硬皮病疗效评估指标的系统性审查和患者优先权评估

Q3 Medicine
Sara Jasionowska, A. Almadori, Mary Goble, B. Langridge, D. Iakovou, Fady Kamel, Milla McKenzie, Allan Mclean, D. Boyle, N. Zenner, V. Swale, Peter E. M. Butler
{"title":"外阴硬皮病疗效评估指标的系统性审查和患者优先权评估","authors":"Sara Jasionowska, A. Almadori, Mary Goble, B. Langridge, D. Iakovou, Fady Kamel, Milla McKenzie, Allan Mclean, D. Boyle, N. Zenner, V. Swale, Peter E. M. Butler","doi":"10.1002/ski2.422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vulval lichen sclerosus (VLS) is an inflammatory skin disease characterised by itching, apareunia, loss of vulval architecture and scarring. Heterogeneity in outcome reporting precludes comparison between treatments. This study aimed to systematically review outcome measures used to evaluate the efficacy of VLS treatments and present patients' treatment priorities. This review followed the PRISMA guidelines using a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022356738). Multiple databases were searched, along with grey literature on Clinicaltrials.gov, European Union Clinical Trials and International Standard Randomised controlled trial (RCT) registries. All RCTs assessing any treatment for VLS were eligible for inclusion. A total of 775 patients were assessed across 21 RCTs. The assessment tools reported outcomes in the following domains: patient‐reported symptoms assessed with one validated scale in 12 studies and seven non‐validated scales in nine studies; sexual function with validated female sexual function index and female sexual distress scale in two studies and two non‐validated scales in two studies; quality of life with three validated scales in three studies and clinician‐reported objective outcomes with two validated scales in three studies and six non‐validated scales in fourteen studies. Histological changes were assessed in 10 studies and tissue biomechanics in one study. We also carried out an online survey completed by 809 women with VLS to assess their research and disease treatment priorities and identified validated outcome measures to assess these. There is high variability in assessing treatment outcomes for VLS. We identified validated assessment tools which could be implemented in VLS studies to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments.","PeriodicalId":74804,"journal":{"name":"Skin health and disease","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of outcome measures evaluating treatment efficacy in vulval lichen sclerosus and evaluation of patients' priorities\",\"authors\":\"Sara Jasionowska, A. Almadori, Mary Goble, B. Langridge, D. Iakovou, Fady Kamel, Milla McKenzie, Allan Mclean, D. Boyle, N. Zenner, V. Swale, Peter E. M. Butler\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ski2.422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vulval lichen sclerosus (VLS) is an inflammatory skin disease characterised by itching, apareunia, loss of vulval architecture and scarring. Heterogeneity in outcome reporting precludes comparison between treatments. This study aimed to systematically review outcome measures used to evaluate the efficacy of VLS treatments and present patients' treatment priorities. This review followed the PRISMA guidelines using a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022356738). Multiple databases were searched, along with grey literature on Clinicaltrials.gov, European Union Clinical Trials and International Standard Randomised controlled trial (RCT) registries. All RCTs assessing any treatment for VLS were eligible for inclusion. A total of 775 patients were assessed across 21 RCTs. The assessment tools reported outcomes in the following domains: patient‐reported symptoms assessed with one validated scale in 12 studies and seven non‐validated scales in nine studies; sexual function with validated female sexual function index and female sexual distress scale in two studies and two non‐validated scales in two studies; quality of life with three validated scales in three studies and clinician‐reported objective outcomes with two validated scales in three studies and six non‐validated scales in fourteen studies. Histological changes were assessed in 10 studies and tissue biomechanics in one study. We also carried out an online survey completed by 809 women with VLS to assess their research and disease treatment priorities and identified validated outcome measures to assess these. There is high variability in assessing treatment outcomes for VLS. We identified validated assessment tools which could be implemented in VLS studies to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skin health and disease\",\"volume\":\" 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skin health and disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin health and disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

外阴硬皮病(VLS)是一种炎症性皮肤病,以瘙痒、红斑、外阴结构丧失和瘢痕形成为特征。由于结果报告的不一致性,无法对不同的治疗方法进行比较。本研究旨在系统回顾用于评估 VLS 疗效的结果指标,并介绍患者的治疗重点。本综述遵循 PRISMA 指南,使用注册协议(PROSPERO:CRD42022356738)。检索了多个数据库,以及 Clinicaltrials.gov、欧盟临床试验和国际标准随机对照试验 (RCT) 登记处的灰色文献。所有评估任何 VLS 治疗方法的 RCT 均符合纳入条件。21 项 RCT 共对 775 名患者进行了评估。评估工具报告了以下方面的结果:患者报告的症状评估,12 项研究中使用了一个有效量表,9 项研究中使用了 7 个未经验证的量表;性功能评估,2 项研究中使用了有效的女性性功能指数和女性性困扰量表,2 项研究中使用了 2 个未经验证的量表;生活质量评估,3 项研究中使用了 3 个有效量表,临床医生报告的客观结果评估,3 项研究中使用了 2 个有效量表,14 项研究中使用了 6 个未经验证的量表。10项研究对组织学变化进行了评估,1项研究对组织生物力学进行了评估。我们还对 809 名女性 VLS 患者进行了在线调查,以评估她们在研究和疾病治疗方面的优先事项,并确定了评估这些优先事项的有效结果指标。对 VLS 治疗结果的评估存在很大差异。我们确定了可用于 VLS 研究的有效评估工具,以评估治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of outcome measures evaluating treatment efficacy in vulval lichen sclerosus and evaluation of patients' priorities
Vulval lichen sclerosus (VLS) is an inflammatory skin disease characterised by itching, apareunia, loss of vulval architecture and scarring. Heterogeneity in outcome reporting precludes comparison between treatments. This study aimed to systematically review outcome measures used to evaluate the efficacy of VLS treatments and present patients' treatment priorities. This review followed the PRISMA guidelines using a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022356738). Multiple databases were searched, along with grey literature on Clinicaltrials.gov, European Union Clinical Trials and International Standard Randomised controlled trial (RCT) registries. All RCTs assessing any treatment for VLS were eligible for inclusion. A total of 775 patients were assessed across 21 RCTs. The assessment tools reported outcomes in the following domains: patient‐reported symptoms assessed with one validated scale in 12 studies and seven non‐validated scales in nine studies; sexual function with validated female sexual function index and female sexual distress scale in two studies and two non‐validated scales in two studies; quality of life with three validated scales in three studies and clinician‐reported objective outcomes with two validated scales in three studies and six non‐validated scales in fourteen studies. Histological changes were assessed in 10 studies and tissue biomechanics in one study. We also carried out an online survey completed by 809 women with VLS to assess their research and disease treatment priorities and identified validated outcome measures to assess these. There is high variability in assessing treatment outcomes for VLS. We identified validated assessment tools which could be implemented in VLS studies to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信