自闭症儿童临床护理中的支持偏好和临床决策支持系统 (CDSS):利益相关者的观点

IF 1.5 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Rhylee Sulek, Julia Robertson, Emma Goodall, Alan Wee-Cheung Liew, Sarah Pillar, Gemma Upson, Andrew J. O. Whitehouse, Rachelle Wicks, David Trembath
{"title":"自闭症儿童临床护理中的支持偏好和临床决策支持系统 (CDSS):利益相关者的观点","authors":"Rhylee Sulek,&nbsp;Julia Robertson,&nbsp;Emma Goodall,&nbsp;Alan Wee-Cheung Liew,&nbsp;Sarah Pillar,&nbsp;Gemma Upson,&nbsp;Andrew J. O. Whitehouse,&nbsp;Rachelle Wicks,&nbsp;David Trembath","doi":"10.1007/s41252-024-00410-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are increasingly utilised within healthcare settings to enhance decision making. However, few studies have investigated their application in the context of clinical services for autistic people, with no research to date exploring the perspectives of the key stakeholders who are, or in the future may be, impacted by their use. Given the importance of stakeholder perspectives in ensuring that CDSSs are relevant, feasible, and acceptable to those who use them, the aim of this study was to examine the views of key stakeholders in relation to support preferences and a proposed CDSS intended to aide in the selection of the most appropriate supports for autistic children.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>Using a co-designed, mixed-methods approach, 20 participants comprising autistic adults, parents of autistic children, and practitioners providing services to autistic children were invited to participate in focus groups, or an open-ended online survey, to explore views regarding support provision and any opportunities, barriers, recommendations, and support for the use of CDSSs in clinical practice.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants highlighted potential benefits of using a CDSS in clinical practice, such as creating efficiencies and consistency in decision making when selecting therapies and supports, provided it was part of a holistic approach to working with autistic children. Potential barriers largely centred on concerns about the safety of data to be utilised within the system.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings indicate that CDSS have the potential to play a valuable role in selecting supports for autistic children, providing appropriate safeguarding occurs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36163,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders","volume":"9 2","pages":"355 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41252-024-00410-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Support Preferences and Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) in the Clinical Care of Autistic Children: Stakeholder Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Rhylee Sulek,&nbsp;Julia Robertson,&nbsp;Emma Goodall,&nbsp;Alan Wee-Cheung Liew,&nbsp;Sarah Pillar,&nbsp;Gemma Upson,&nbsp;Andrew J. O. Whitehouse,&nbsp;Rachelle Wicks,&nbsp;David Trembath\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41252-024-00410-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are increasingly utilised within healthcare settings to enhance decision making. However, few studies have investigated their application in the context of clinical services for autistic people, with no research to date exploring the perspectives of the key stakeholders who are, or in the future may be, impacted by their use. Given the importance of stakeholder perspectives in ensuring that CDSSs are relevant, feasible, and acceptable to those who use them, the aim of this study was to examine the views of key stakeholders in relation to support preferences and a proposed CDSS intended to aide in the selection of the most appropriate supports for autistic children.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>Using a co-designed, mixed-methods approach, 20 participants comprising autistic adults, parents of autistic children, and practitioners providing services to autistic children were invited to participate in focus groups, or an open-ended online survey, to explore views regarding support provision and any opportunities, barriers, recommendations, and support for the use of CDSSs in clinical practice.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants highlighted potential benefits of using a CDSS in clinical practice, such as creating efficiencies and consistency in decision making when selecting therapies and supports, provided it was part of a holistic approach to working with autistic children. Potential barriers largely centred on concerns about the safety of data to be utilised within the system.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings indicate that CDSS have the potential to play a valuable role in selecting supports for autistic children, providing appropriate safeguarding occurs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"355 - 365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41252-024-00410-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41252-024-00410-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41252-024-00410-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床决策支持系统(CDSS)越来越多地应用于医疗机构,以提高决策。然而,很少有研究调查了它们在自闭症患者临床服务中的应用,迄今为止还没有研究探索关键利益相关者的观点,这些利益相关者正在或将来可能受到它们的使用的影响。考虑到利益相关者的观点在确保CDSS的相关性、可行性和可接受性方面的重要性,本研究的目的是研究主要利益相关者对支持偏好的看法,以及拟议的CDSS旨在帮助自闭症儿童选择最合适的支持。方法采用共同设计的混合方法,邀请20名参与者(包括自闭症成年人、自闭症儿童的父母和为自闭症儿童提供服务的从业人员)参加焦点小组或开放式在线调查,以探讨有关支持提供以及临床实践中使用cdss的任何机会、障碍、建议和支持的观点。结果:参与者强调了在临床实践中使用CDSS的潜在好处,例如在选择治疗和支持时提高决策的效率和一致性,前提是它是治疗自闭症儿童的整体方法的一部分。潜在的障碍主要集中在对系统内使用的数据安全性的担忧上。结论CDSS在自闭症儿童的支持选择中发挥了重要作用,为自闭症儿童提供了适当的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Support Preferences and Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) in the Clinical Care of Autistic Children: Stakeholder Perspectives

Objectives

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are increasingly utilised within healthcare settings to enhance decision making. However, few studies have investigated their application in the context of clinical services for autistic people, with no research to date exploring the perspectives of the key stakeholders who are, or in the future may be, impacted by their use. Given the importance of stakeholder perspectives in ensuring that CDSSs are relevant, feasible, and acceptable to those who use them, the aim of this study was to examine the views of key stakeholders in relation to support preferences and a proposed CDSS intended to aide in the selection of the most appropriate supports for autistic children.

Method

Using a co-designed, mixed-methods approach, 20 participants comprising autistic adults, parents of autistic children, and practitioners providing services to autistic children were invited to participate in focus groups, or an open-ended online survey, to explore views regarding support provision and any opportunities, barriers, recommendations, and support for the use of CDSSs in clinical practice.

Results

Participants highlighted potential benefits of using a CDSS in clinical practice, such as creating efficiencies and consistency in decision making when selecting therapies and supports, provided it was part of a holistic approach to working with autistic children. Potential barriers largely centred on concerns about the safety of data to be utilised within the system.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that CDSS have the potential to play a valuable role in selecting supports for autistic children, providing appropriate safeguarding occurs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders publishes high-quality research in the broad area of neurodevelopmental disorders across the lifespan. Study participants may include individuals with:Intellectual and developmental disabilitiesGlobal developmental delayCommunication disordersLanguage disordersSpeech sound disordersChildhood-onset fluency disorders (e.g., stuttering)Social (e.g., pragmatic) communication disordersUnspecified communication disordersAutism spectrum disorder (ASD)Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), specified and unspecifiedSpecific learning disordersMotor disordersDevelopmental coordination disordersStereotypic movement disorderTic disorders, specified and unspecifiedOther neurodevelopmental disorders, specified and unspecifiedPapers may also include studies of participants with neurodegenerative disorders that lead to a decline in intellectual functioning, including Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, corticobasal degeneration, Huntington’s disease, and progressive supranuclear palsy. The journal includes empirical, theoretical and review papers on a large variety of issues, populations, and domains, including but not limited to: diagnosis; incidence and prevalence; and educational, pharmacological, behavioral and cognitive behavioral, mindfulness, and psychosocial interventions across the life span. Animal models of basic research that inform the understanding and treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders are also welcomed. The journal is multidisciplinary and multi-theoretical, and encourages research from multiple specialties in the social sciences using quantitative and mixed-method research methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信