{"title":"A - 11 自主焦虑与广泛焦虑:大学运动员运动性脑震荡恢复时间的预测方法","authors":"F. Nelson, E. Clise, A. Logalbo","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae052.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This study represents the second phase in testing a self-report anxiety questionnaire and self-report vestibular symptom questionnaire, including its subscales, as potential competing predictive factors of protracted concussion recovery times among collegiate athletes.\n \n \n \n The Vertigo Symptom Scale-Short Form (VSS-SF) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) were administered to 31 collegiate athletes (18 females, 13 males, ages 18–23) at baseline and post-injury. Participant data was grouped by number of days until symptom resolution post-concussion (1–10 days [N = 18], 11+ days [N = 13]). VSS-SF, VSS-SF-Autonomic-Anxiety (VSS-SF-A), VSS-SF-Vestibular-Balance (VSS-SF-V), and GAD-7 scores were calculated via scoring guidelines.\n \n \n \n Results from an independent-samples t-test demonstrated that post-injury VSS-SF-A scores were significantly higher among athletes with 11+ recovery days (M = 3.08, SD = 3.71) compared to those with 1–10 recovery days (M = 1.06, SD = 2.65); t(29) = 1.78, p = 0.043, Cohen’s d = 0.65. Similar t-tests for post-injury VSS-SF-V (11+ [M = 5.23, SD = 6.41], 1–10 [M = 3.17, SD = 3.67]) and GAD-7 (11+ [M = 4.08, SD = 4.84], 1–10 [M = 2.50, SD = 2.23]) scores were not significant; t(29) = 1.14, p = 0.132, t(29) = 1.22, p = 0.116. A linear regression revealed that post-injury VSS-SF-A scores significantly predicted recovery time and explained 14.1% of the variance (b = 0.88, R2 = 0.14, p = 0.037). Post-injury VSS-SF-V and GAD-7 scores were not significant predictors.\n \n \n \n Results suggest that post-injury VSS-SF-A scores can aid in identifying athletes that may be at risk for longer recovery times. Additionally, post-concussive autonomic anxiety appears to have a greater influence on athletes’recovery time, as compared to generalized anxiety symptoms. Interventions directed towards reducing and/or coping with autonomic anxiety symptoms may be particularly important for supporting post-concussive recovery.\n","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A - 11 Autonomic Anxiety vs Generalized Anxiety: Predictive Recovery Time in Sport-Related Concussions among Collegiate Athletes\",\"authors\":\"F. Nelson, E. Clise, A. Logalbo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acae052.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n This study represents the second phase in testing a self-report anxiety questionnaire and self-report vestibular symptom questionnaire, including its subscales, as potential competing predictive factors of protracted concussion recovery times among collegiate athletes.\\n \\n \\n \\n The Vertigo Symptom Scale-Short Form (VSS-SF) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) were administered to 31 collegiate athletes (18 females, 13 males, ages 18–23) at baseline and post-injury. Participant data was grouped by number of days until symptom resolution post-concussion (1–10 days [N = 18], 11+ days [N = 13]). VSS-SF, VSS-SF-Autonomic-Anxiety (VSS-SF-A), VSS-SF-Vestibular-Balance (VSS-SF-V), and GAD-7 scores were calculated via scoring guidelines.\\n \\n \\n \\n Results from an independent-samples t-test demonstrated that post-injury VSS-SF-A scores were significantly higher among athletes with 11+ recovery days (M = 3.08, SD = 3.71) compared to those with 1–10 recovery days (M = 1.06, SD = 2.65); t(29) = 1.78, p = 0.043, Cohen’s d = 0.65. Similar t-tests for post-injury VSS-SF-V (11+ [M = 5.23, SD = 6.41], 1–10 [M = 3.17, SD = 3.67]) and GAD-7 (11+ [M = 4.08, SD = 4.84], 1–10 [M = 2.50, SD = 2.23]) scores were not significant; t(29) = 1.14, p = 0.132, t(29) = 1.22, p = 0.116. A linear regression revealed that post-injury VSS-SF-A scores significantly predicted recovery time and explained 14.1% of the variance (b = 0.88, R2 = 0.14, p = 0.037). Post-injury VSS-SF-V and GAD-7 scores were not significant predictors.\\n \\n \\n \\n Results suggest that post-injury VSS-SF-A scores can aid in identifying athletes that may be at risk for longer recovery times. Additionally, post-concussive autonomic anxiety appears to have a greater influence on athletes’recovery time, as compared to generalized anxiety symptoms. Interventions directed towards reducing and/or coping with autonomic anxiety symptoms may be particularly important for supporting post-concussive recovery.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":8176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.11\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A - 11 Autonomic Anxiety vs Generalized Anxiety: Predictive Recovery Time in Sport-Related Concussions among Collegiate Athletes
This study represents the second phase in testing a self-report anxiety questionnaire and self-report vestibular symptom questionnaire, including its subscales, as potential competing predictive factors of protracted concussion recovery times among collegiate athletes.
The Vertigo Symptom Scale-Short Form (VSS-SF) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) were administered to 31 collegiate athletes (18 females, 13 males, ages 18–23) at baseline and post-injury. Participant data was grouped by number of days until symptom resolution post-concussion (1–10 days [N = 18], 11+ days [N = 13]). VSS-SF, VSS-SF-Autonomic-Anxiety (VSS-SF-A), VSS-SF-Vestibular-Balance (VSS-SF-V), and GAD-7 scores were calculated via scoring guidelines.
Results from an independent-samples t-test demonstrated that post-injury VSS-SF-A scores were significantly higher among athletes with 11+ recovery days (M = 3.08, SD = 3.71) compared to those with 1–10 recovery days (M = 1.06, SD = 2.65); t(29) = 1.78, p = 0.043, Cohen’s d = 0.65. Similar t-tests for post-injury VSS-SF-V (11+ [M = 5.23, SD = 6.41], 1–10 [M = 3.17, SD = 3.67]) and GAD-7 (11+ [M = 4.08, SD = 4.84], 1–10 [M = 2.50, SD = 2.23]) scores were not significant; t(29) = 1.14, p = 0.132, t(29) = 1.22, p = 0.116. A linear regression revealed that post-injury VSS-SF-A scores significantly predicted recovery time and explained 14.1% of the variance (b = 0.88, R2 = 0.14, p = 0.037). Post-injury VSS-SF-V and GAD-7 scores were not significant predictors.
Results suggest that post-injury VSS-SF-A scores can aid in identifying athletes that may be at risk for longer recovery times. Additionally, post-concussive autonomic anxiety appears to have a greater influence on athletes’recovery time, as compared to generalized anxiety symptoms. Interventions directed towards reducing and/or coping with autonomic anxiety symptoms may be particularly important for supporting post-concussive recovery.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.