评估 COVID 后疲劳及其功能限制的比较研究

Maria M. Ali, Asma Arman, Sahar Zuberi, Shahameen Aqeel, Shahjabeen
{"title":"评估 COVID 后疲劳及其功能限制的比较研究","authors":"Maria M. Ali, Asma Arman, Sahar Zuberi, Shahameen Aqeel, Shahjabeen","doi":"10.2174/0126667975301718240625111222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThis work aimed to study the difference in the level of fatigue perception between\ncases and controls, who did not have COVID-19. This study sought to establish the impact of\nseverity of infection with fatigue scores on the quality of life.\n\n\n\nThis observational case-control study, recruiting 165 participants, both males and females,\nfrom Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan, started from August 2022 to October\n2023 after obtaining their consent. A total of 65 COVID-positive with 21.5% hospitalized and 78.5%\nnon-hospitalized subjects were included. Post-COVID fatigue among the participants was compared\nusing the validated Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ-11), and WHOQOL\nscale.\n\n\n\nParticipants in all groups reported fatigue on the Fatigue Severity Scale with Covid-positive\n(38.25 ±12.15) and Covid-negative (33.75±11.28) rate, with a significant p-value (0.031). According\nto CFQ, no significant difference (p=0.91) was found between fatigue scores of Covid positive and\nnegative. However, a significant (p=0. 016) difference was observed between Covid-positive hospitalized\n(4.37±0.33) and non-hospitalized (1.98 ±0.22) subjects. QOL scores in different domains,\nincluding QOL General Health (7.18±1.54), physical (20.38±3.51), psychological (46.33±7.05), and\nsocial (9.98±1.94), were all significant (p=0.00) when compared between Covid positives and negatives.\n\n\n\nThe study revealed that post-covid survivors experienced fatigue, which imposed limitations\non different aspects of life, which was different from the fatigue of non-affected individuals.\n","PeriodicalId":10815,"journal":{"name":"Coronaviruses","volume":" 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study to Assess Post-COVID Fatigue and its Functional\\nLimitations\",\"authors\":\"Maria M. Ali, Asma Arman, Sahar Zuberi, Shahameen Aqeel, Shahjabeen\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0126667975301718240625111222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThis work aimed to study the difference in the level of fatigue perception between\\ncases and controls, who did not have COVID-19. This study sought to establish the impact of\\nseverity of infection with fatigue scores on the quality of life.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis observational case-control study, recruiting 165 participants, both males and females,\\nfrom Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan, started from August 2022 to October\\n2023 after obtaining their consent. A total of 65 COVID-positive with 21.5% hospitalized and 78.5%\\nnon-hospitalized subjects were included. Post-COVID fatigue among the participants was compared\\nusing the validated Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ-11), and WHOQOL\\nscale.\\n\\n\\n\\nParticipants in all groups reported fatigue on the Fatigue Severity Scale with Covid-positive\\n(38.25 ±12.15) and Covid-negative (33.75±11.28) rate, with a significant p-value (0.031). According\\nto CFQ, no significant difference (p=0.91) was found between fatigue scores of Covid positive and\\nnegative. However, a significant (p=0. 016) difference was observed between Covid-positive hospitalized\\n(4.37±0.33) and non-hospitalized (1.98 ±0.22) subjects. QOL scores in different domains,\\nincluding QOL General Health (7.18±1.54), physical (20.38±3.51), psychological (46.33±7.05), and\\nsocial (9.98±1.94), were all significant (p=0.00) when compared between Covid positives and negatives.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe study revealed that post-covid survivors experienced fatigue, which imposed limitations\\non different aspects of life, which was different from the fatigue of non-affected individuals.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":10815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronaviruses\",\"volume\":\" 29\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronaviruses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975301718240625111222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronaviruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975301718240625111222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作旨在研究未感染COVID-19的病例与对照组之间在疲劳感水平上的差异。这项观察性病例对照研究从 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 10 月,在征得巴基斯坦卡拉奇 Fazaia Ruth Pfau 医学院的 165 名男性和女性参与者的同意后开始进行。共纳入 65 名 COVID 阳性受试者,其中 21.5% 为住院受试者,78.5% 为非住院受试者。所有组别中,Covid阳性(38.25±12.15)和Covid阴性(33.75±11.28)的受试者均在疲劳严重程度量表上报告疲劳,P值显著(0.031)。根据 CFQ,Covid 阳性和阴性患者的疲劳评分无明显差异(P=0.91)。然而,在 Covid 阳性住院患者(4.37±0.33)和非住院患者(1.98±0.22)之间观察到了明显的差异(P=0.016)。Covid阳性和阴性受试者在不同领域的QOL评分,包括QOL一般健康(7.18±1.54)、身体(20.38±3.51)、心理(46.33±7.05)和社会(9.98±1.94),均有显著性差异(P=0.00)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study to Assess Post-COVID Fatigue and its Functional Limitations
This work aimed to study the difference in the level of fatigue perception between cases and controls, who did not have COVID-19. This study sought to establish the impact of severity of infection with fatigue scores on the quality of life. This observational case-control study, recruiting 165 participants, both males and females, from Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan, started from August 2022 to October 2023 after obtaining their consent. A total of 65 COVID-positive with 21.5% hospitalized and 78.5% non-hospitalized subjects were included. Post-COVID fatigue among the participants was compared using the validated Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ-11), and WHOQOL scale. Participants in all groups reported fatigue on the Fatigue Severity Scale with Covid-positive (38.25 ±12.15) and Covid-negative (33.75±11.28) rate, with a significant p-value (0.031). According to CFQ, no significant difference (p=0.91) was found between fatigue scores of Covid positive and negative. However, a significant (p=0. 016) difference was observed between Covid-positive hospitalized (4.37±0.33) and non-hospitalized (1.98 ±0.22) subjects. QOL scores in different domains, including QOL General Health (7.18±1.54), physical (20.38±3.51), psychological (46.33±7.05), and social (9.98±1.94), were all significant (p=0.00) when compared between Covid positives and negatives. The study revealed that post-covid survivors experienced fatigue, which imposed limitations on different aspects of life, which was different from the fatigue of non-affected individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信