A - 41 成人脑震荡后恐惧规避行为、临床结果和康复时间之间的关系

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
A. J. Zynda, C. Perry, A. Reed, M. Collins, A. Kontos, A. Trbovich
{"title":"A - 41 成人脑震荡后恐惧规避行为、临床结果和康复时间之间的关系","authors":"A. J. Zynda, C. Perry, A. Reed, M. Collins, A. Kontos, A. Trbovich","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae052.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To examine the relationship between fear-avoidance behavior, clinical outcomes, and recovery time in adults following concussion.\n \n \n \n This prospective study included patients aged 18–50 years who presented to a specialty clinic 5–30 days post-concussion. Participants completed a clinical intake (e.g., demographics/medical history), multidomain clinical assessment (Clinical Profile Screen [CP-Screen], Immediate Post-concussion Cognitive Testing [ImPACT], Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screen [VOMS], Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9], Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]), and the Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS). Recovery time was ascertained at a subsequent visit(s). Fear-avoidant (FA) and non-fear-avoidant (NFA) groups were classified using cutoffs from the FACS (FA = 41–100; NFA = 0–40) and compared using independent samples t-tests, X2 tests, and analyses of covariance.\n \n \n \n Seventy-two participants (M = 28.7¬ ± 8.5 years, 69.4% female) were included: 37 (51.4%) in the FA and 35 (48.6%) in the NFA group. Groups did not differ on demographics, medical history, injury characteristics, or CP-Screen. A greater proportion of the FA group had the anxiety/mood profile (62.2% vs 31.4%, p < 0.01). The FA group had worse ImPACT reaction time (t(68) = −2.7, p < 0.01, d = −0.7), VOMS visual motion sensitivity (t(67) = −2.3, p = 0.03, d = −0.5), GAD-7 (t(70) = −3.9, p < 0.01, d = −0.9), and PHQ-9 (t(69) = −2.8, p < 0.01, d = −0.7) scores, and longer recovery (t(24) = −2.8, p = 0.01, d = −0.9), even when controlling for age and time to clinic (F[1, 22] = 4.6, p = 0.04, ηp2 = 0.17).\n \n \n \n Adults who reported high fear-avoidance (e.g., avoiding activity, catastrophizing) had worse clinical outcomes and longer recovery following concussion compared to non-fear-avoidant adults, despite no differences in demographics, medical history, injury characteristics, or symptoms. Clinicians should screen for and counsel adults post-concussion against engaging in fear-avoidance behaviors to improve recovery outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A - 41 Relationship between Fear-Avoidance Behavior, Clinical Outcomes, and Recovery Time in Adults Following Concussion\",\"authors\":\"A. J. Zynda, C. Perry, A. Reed, M. Collins, A. Kontos, A. Trbovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acae052.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n To examine the relationship between fear-avoidance behavior, clinical outcomes, and recovery time in adults following concussion.\\n \\n \\n \\n This prospective study included patients aged 18–50 years who presented to a specialty clinic 5–30 days post-concussion. Participants completed a clinical intake (e.g., demographics/medical history), multidomain clinical assessment (Clinical Profile Screen [CP-Screen], Immediate Post-concussion Cognitive Testing [ImPACT], Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screen [VOMS], Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9], Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]), and the Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS). Recovery time was ascertained at a subsequent visit(s). Fear-avoidant (FA) and non-fear-avoidant (NFA) groups were classified using cutoffs from the FACS (FA = 41–100; NFA = 0–40) and compared using independent samples t-tests, X2 tests, and analyses of covariance.\\n \\n \\n \\n Seventy-two participants (M = 28.7¬ ± 8.5 years, 69.4% female) were included: 37 (51.4%) in the FA and 35 (48.6%) in the NFA group. Groups did not differ on demographics, medical history, injury characteristics, or CP-Screen. A greater proportion of the FA group had the anxiety/mood profile (62.2% vs 31.4%, p < 0.01). The FA group had worse ImPACT reaction time (t(68) = −2.7, p < 0.01, d = −0.7), VOMS visual motion sensitivity (t(67) = −2.3, p = 0.03, d = −0.5), GAD-7 (t(70) = −3.9, p < 0.01, d = −0.9), and PHQ-9 (t(69) = −2.8, p < 0.01, d = −0.7) scores, and longer recovery (t(24) = −2.8, p = 0.01, d = −0.9), even when controlling for age and time to clinic (F[1, 22] = 4.6, p = 0.04, ηp2 = 0.17).\\n \\n \\n \\n Adults who reported high fear-avoidance (e.g., avoiding activity, catastrophizing) had worse clinical outcomes and longer recovery following concussion compared to non-fear-avoidant adults, despite no differences in demographics, medical history, injury characteristics, or symptoms. Clinicians should screen for and counsel adults post-concussion against engaging in fear-avoidance behaviors to improve recovery outcomes.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究成人脑震荡后恐惧回避行为、临床结果和恢复时间之间的关系。 这项前瞻性研究包括脑震荡后 5-30 天到专科门诊就诊的 18-50 岁患者。参与者完成了临床入组(如人口统计学/病史)、多领域临床评估(临床概况筛查 [CP-Screen]、脑震荡后即刻认知测试 [ImPACT]、前庭/眼球运动筛查 [VOMS]、患者健康问卷-9 [PHQ-9]、广泛性焦虑症-7 [GAD-7])和恐惧-回避成分量表 (FACS)。恢复时间在后续就诊时确定。恐惧回避组(FA)和非恐惧回避组(NFA)使用 FACS 的分界点进行分类(FA = 41-100;NFA = 0-40),并使用独立样本 t 检验、X2 检验和协方差分析进行比较。 72名参与者(中=28.7±8.5岁,69.4%为女性)被纳入其中:FA组37人(51.4%),NFA组35人(48.6%)。两组在人口统计学、病史、受伤特征或 CP-Screen 方面没有差异。有焦虑/情绪特征的 FA 组患者比例更高(62.2% vs 31.4%,P < 0.01)。FA组的ImPACT反应时间(t(68) = -2.7,p < 0.01,d = -0.7)、VOMS视觉运动敏感度(t(67) = -2.3,p = 0.03,d = -0.5)、GAD-7(t(70) = -3.9,p < 0.01,d = -0.9)和PHQ-9(t(70) = -3.9,p < 0.01,d = -0.9)更差。9)、PHQ-9(t(69) = -2.8,p < 0.01,d = -0.7)得分,恢复时间更长(t(24) = -2.8,p = 0.01,d = -0.9),即使控制了年龄和就诊时间(F[1, 22] = 4.6,p = 0.04,ηp2 = 0.17)。 尽管在人口统计学、病史、受伤特征或症状方面没有差异,但与不回避恐惧的成年人相比,报告高度回避恐惧(如回避活动、灾难化)的成年人在脑震荡后的临床结果更差,恢复时间更长。临床医生应该对脑震荡后的成年人进行筛查,并劝导他们不要做出回避恐惧的行为,以改善康复效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A - 41 Relationship between Fear-Avoidance Behavior, Clinical Outcomes, and Recovery Time in Adults Following Concussion
To examine the relationship between fear-avoidance behavior, clinical outcomes, and recovery time in adults following concussion. This prospective study included patients aged 18–50 years who presented to a specialty clinic 5–30 days post-concussion. Participants completed a clinical intake (e.g., demographics/medical history), multidomain clinical assessment (Clinical Profile Screen [CP-Screen], Immediate Post-concussion Cognitive Testing [ImPACT], Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screen [VOMS], Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9], Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]), and the Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS). Recovery time was ascertained at a subsequent visit(s). Fear-avoidant (FA) and non-fear-avoidant (NFA) groups were classified using cutoffs from the FACS (FA = 41–100; NFA = 0–40) and compared using independent samples t-tests, X2 tests, and analyses of covariance. Seventy-two participants (M = 28.7¬ ± 8.5 years, 69.4% female) were included: 37 (51.4%) in the FA and 35 (48.6%) in the NFA group. Groups did not differ on demographics, medical history, injury characteristics, or CP-Screen. A greater proportion of the FA group had the anxiety/mood profile (62.2% vs 31.4%, p < 0.01). The FA group had worse ImPACT reaction time (t(68) = −2.7, p < 0.01, d = −0.7), VOMS visual motion sensitivity (t(67) = −2.3, p = 0.03, d = −0.5), GAD-7 (t(70) = −3.9, p < 0.01, d = −0.9), and PHQ-9 (t(69) = −2.8, p < 0.01, d = −0.7) scores, and longer recovery (t(24) = −2.8, p = 0.01, d = −0.9), even when controlling for age and time to clinic (F[1, 22] = 4.6, p = 0.04, ηp2 = 0.17). Adults who reported high fear-avoidance (e.g., avoiding activity, catastrophizing) had worse clinical outcomes and longer recovery following concussion compared to non-fear-avoidant adults, despite no differences in demographics, medical history, injury characteristics, or symptoms. Clinicians should screen for and counsel adults post-concussion against engaging in fear-avoidance behaviors to improve recovery outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信