A - 14 研究 Sway 医疗系统平衡和认知测试中与种族有关的差异

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
K. Stephenson, J. E. Maietta, A. Kissinger-Knox, N. E. Cook, G. L. Iverson
{"title":"A - 14 研究 Sway 医疗系统平衡和认知测试中与种族有关的差异","authors":"K. Stephenson, J. E. Maietta, A. Kissinger-Knox, N. E. Cook, G. L. Iverson","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae052.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To determine if there are race-associated differences in Sway Medical System balance and cognitive test scores among athletes undergoing baseline preseason testing.\n \n \n \n Athletes between 12 and 23 years old were administered the Sway Medical System balance and cognitive tests during pre-season baseline testing. Participants who did not report a past medical history of ADHD or concussion within the past 6 months were included (N = 32,918). Athletes who self-identified as “Black or African American”or “White”were compared on Balance, Reaction Time, Inspection Time, Impulse Control, and Memory module scores using Mann–Whitney U tests, and statistical tests were stratified by age and gender.\n \n \n \n The race-associated differences (effect sizes) between Black and White athletes ranged from extremely small (negligible) to small across all ages for both genders on Balance, Reaction Time, Inspection Time, and Impulse Control scores. For the Memory module, the effect sizes ranged from small to medium across all ages for both genders. White boys obtained higher Memory scores than Black boys (Hedge’s g = −0.18 to −0.43) and White men obtained higher Memory scores than Black men (g = −0.30 to −0.60). White girls obtained higher Memory scores than Black girls (g = −0.19 to −0.34).\n \n \n \n The race-associated differences between Black and White student-athletes on Sway Medical System balance and cognitive test scores are generally negligible. The reasons for modest race-associated differences in Memory scores are unknown and future research to examine the potential role or influence of social risk factors and social psychological factors on test scores is recommended.\n","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A - 14 Examining Race-Associated Differences on Sway Medical System Balance and Cognitive Tests\",\"authors\":\"K. Stephenson, J. E. Maietta, A. Kissinger-Knox, N. E. Cook, G. L. Iverson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acae052.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n To determine if there are race-associated differences in Sway Medical System balance and cognitive test scores among athletes undergoing baseline preseason testing.\\n \\n \\n \\n Athletes between 12 and 23 years old were administered the Sway Medical System balance and cognitive tests during pre-season baseline testing. Participants who did not report a past medical history of ADHD or concussion within the past 6 months were included (N = 32,918). Athletes who self-identified as “Black or African American”or “White”were compared on Balance, Reaction Time, Inspection Time, Impulse Control, and Memory module scores using Mann–Whitney U tests, and statistical tests were stratified by age and gender.\\n \\n \\n \\n The race-associated differences (effect sizes) between Black and White athletes ranged from extremely small (negligible) to small across all ages for both genders on Balance, Reaction Time, Inspection Time, and Impulse Control scores. For the Memory module, the effect sizes ranged from small to medium across all ages for both genders. White boys obtained higher Memory scores than Black boys (Hedge’s g = −0.18 to −0.43) and White men obtained higher Memory scores than Black men (g = −0.30 to −0.60). White girls obtained higher Memory scores than Black girls (g = −0.19 to −0.34).\\n \\n \\n \\n The race-associated differences between Black and White student-athletes on Sway Medical System balance and cognitive test scores are generally negligible. The reasons for modest race-associated differences in Memory scores are unknown and future research to examine the potential role or influence of social risk factors and social psychological factors on test scores is recommended.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":8176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.14\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.14","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定接受季前基线测试的运动员在 Sway 医疗系统平衡和认知测试得分方面是否存在与种族有关的差异。 在季前基线测试期间,对 12 至 23 岁的运动员进行了 Sway 医疗系统平衡和认知测试。过去 6 个月内未报告有多动症或脑震荡病史的参与者均被纳入其中(N = 32,918)。对自我认同为 "黑人或非裔美国人 "或 "白人 "的运动员进行了平衡、反应时间、检查时间、冲动控制和记忆模块得分的曼-惠特尼 U 检验比较,并按年龄和性别进行了分层统计检验。 黑人和白人运动员在平衡能力、反应时间、检查时间和冲动控制得分方面的种族相关差异(效应大小)从极小(可忽略不计)到较小不等。在记忆模块中,所有年龄段的男女运动员的效应大小从很小到中等不等。白人男孩的记忆力得分高于黑人男孩(海德氏 g = -0.18 至 -0.43),白人男性的记忆力得分高于黑人男性(g = -0.30 至 -0.60)。白人女孩的记忆力得分高于黑人女孩(g = -0.19 至 -0.34)。 黑人和白人学生运动员在 Sway 医疗系统平衡和认知测试分数上与种族有关的差异一般可以忽略不计。记忆力得分与种族有关的微小差异的原因尚不清楚,建议今后开展研究,探讨社会风险因素和社会心理因素对测试得分的潜在作用或影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A - 14 Examining Race-Associated Differences on Sway Medical System Balance and Cognitive Tests
To determine if there are race-associated differences in Sway Medical System balance and cognitive test scores among athletes undergoing baseline preseason testing. Athletes between 12 and 23 years old were administered the Sway Medical System balance and cognitive tests during pre-season baseline testing. Participants who did not report a past medical history of ADHD or concussion within the past 6 months were included (N = 32,918). Athletes who self-identified as “Black or African American”or “White”were compared on Balance, Reaction Time, Inspection Time, Impulse Control, and Memory module scores using Mann–Whitney U tests, and statistical tests were stratified by age and gender. The race-associated differences (effect sizes) between Black and White athletes ranged from extremely small (negligible) to small across all ages for both genders on Balance, Reaction Time, Inspection Time, and Impulse Control scores. For the Memory module, the effect sizes ranged from small to medium across all ages for both genders. White boys obtained higher Memory scores than Black boys (Hedge’s g = −0.18 to −0.43) and White men obtained higher Memory scores than Black men (g = −0.30 to −0.60). White girls obtained higher Memory scores than Black girls (g = −0.19 to −0.34). The race-associated differences between Black and White student-athletes on Sway Medical System balance and cognitive test scores are generally negligible. The reasons for modest race-associated differences in Memory scores are unknown and future research to examine the potential role or influence of social risk factors and social psychological factors on test scores is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信