评估两种可压玻璃陶瓷与其贴面材料的剪切粘合力(体外研究)

momen gamal elsoudany, Ihab Hammad, Islam M. Abdel Raheem
{"title":"评估两种可压玻璃陶瓷与其贴面材料的剪切粘合力(体外研究)","authors":"momen gamal elsoudany, Ihab Hammad, Islam M. Abdel Raheem","doi":"10.21608/adjalexu.2024.246600.1433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The bond between the veneering ceramic and the substructure is important for the long-term survival of the restorations. However, the shear bond strength (SBS) of heat-pressed ceramic substructures to veneering ceramic materials remains unclear. AIM OF STUDY: This study aimed to evaluate the SBS and mode of failure of two heat-pressed glass ceramic substructures (lithium disilicate (LDS) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)) with their corresponding veneering ceramics. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Thirty glass ceramic disk-shaped specimens were fabricated from heat-pressed LDS and ZLS (n = 15) with a diameter of 10mm and a thickness of 3mm. LDS and ZLS specimens were veneered with fluorapatite glass ceramic (FLGC) and leucite-reinforced feldspathic porcelain (LFP), respectively. The veneering material was condensed in a mold and fired on the glass ceramic materials to form a disk with a diameter of 3mm and a thickness of 2mm. Specimens were subjected to shear force in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute until failure of the specimens. The failed specimens were examined under an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope to analyze the mode of failure. Data were analyzed using independent t-test. RESULTS. LDS (29.75 MPa) showed a statistically significant higher shear bond strength than that ZLS (21.96 MPa) ( P value<.05). LDS group showed predominantly cohesive failure, while ZLS group showed mixed adhesive/cohesive failure. CONCLUSIONS. Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate complex failed at lower load levels compared to the lithium disilicate complex. The predominantly cohesive failure mode in LDS specimens reflects the higher bond strength that surpassed the cohesive strength of the heat-pressed ceramic and the veneering material","PeriodicalId":7723,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Dental Journal","volume":" 40","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND OF TWO PRESSABLE GLASS CERAMICS TO THEIR VENEERING MATERIALS (IN VITRO STUDY)\",\"authors\":\"momen gamal elsoudany, Ihab Hammad, Islam M. Abdel Raheem\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/adjalexu.2024.246600.1433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: The bond between the veneering ceramic and the substructure is important for the long-term survival of the restorations. However, the shear bond strength (SBS) of heat-pressed ceramic substructures to veneering ceramic materials remains unclear. AIM OF STUDY: This study aimed to evaluate the SBS and mode of failure of two heat-pressed glass ceramic substructures (lithium disilicate (LDS) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)) with their corresponding veneering ceramics. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Thirty glass ceramic disk-shaped specimens were fabricated from heat-pressed LDS and ZLS (n = 15) with a diameter of 10mm and a thickness of 3mm. LDS and ZLS specimens were veneered with fluorapatite glass ceramic (FLGC) and leucite-reinforced feldspathic porcelain (LFP), respectively. The veneering material was condensed in a mold and fired on the glass ceramic materials to form a disk with a diameter of 3mm and a thickness of 2mm. Specimens were subjected to shear force in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute until failure of the specimens. The failed specimens were examined under an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope to analyze the mode of failure. Data were analyzed using independent t-test. RESULTS. LDS (29.75 MPa) showed a statistically significant higher shear bond strength than that ZLS (21.96 MPa) ( P value<.05). LDS group showed predominantly cohesive failure, while ZLS group showed mixed adhesive/cohesive failure. CONCLUSIONS. Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate complex failed at lower load levels compared to the lithium disilicate complex. The predominantly cohesive failure mode in LDS specimens reflects the higher bond strength that surpassed the cohesive strength of the heat-pressed ceramic and the veneering material\",\"PeriodicalId\":7723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alexandria Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\" 40\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alexandria Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2024.246600.1433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2024.246600.1433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:贴面陶瓷和基底结构之间的粘结对于修复体的长期存活非常重要。然而,热压陶瓷基底结构与贴面陶瓷材料的剪切结合强度(SBS)仍不清楚。研究目的:本研究旨在评估两种热压玻璃陶瓷基底结构(二硅酸锂(LDS)和氧化锆增强硅酸锂(ZLS))与相应贴面陶瓷的 SBS 和失效模式。材料和方法:用热压 LDS 和 ZLS 制作了 30 个玻璃陶瓷圆盘状试样(n = 15),直径为 10 毫米,厚度为 3 毫米。LDS 和 ZLS 试样分别用萤石玻璃陶瓷 (FLGC) 和白榴石强化长石瓷 (LFP) 贴面。贴面材料在模具中凝结,并在玻璃陶瓷材料上烧制成直径为 3 毫米、厚度为 2 毫米的圆盘。试样在万能试验机中以 0.5 毫米/分钟的十字头速度承受剪切力,直至试样失效。在光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜下检查失效试样,分析失效模式。数据分析采用独立 t 检验。结果在统计学上,LDS(29.75 兆帕)的剪切粘结强度明显高于 ZLS(21.96 兆帕)(P 值<.05)。LDS 组主要表现为内聚失效,而 ZLS 组则表现为粘合/内聚混合失效。结论。与二硅酸锂复合材料相比,氧化锆增强硅酸锂复合材料在较低负载水平下失效。LDS 试样的主要内聚失效模式反映了较高的粘接强度,超过了热压陶瓷和贴面材料的内聚强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND OF TWO PRESSABLE GLASS CERAMICS TO THEIR VENEERING MATERIALS (IN VITRO STUDY)
INTRODUCTION: The bond between the veneering ceramic and the substructure is important for the long-term survival of the restorations. However, the shear bond strength (SBS) of heat-pressed ceramic substructures to veneering ceramic materials remains unclear. AIM OF STUDY: This study aimed to evaluate the SBS and mode of failure of two heat-pressed glass ceramic substructures (lithium disilicate (LDS) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)) with their corresponding veneering ceramics. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Thirty glass ceramic disk-shaped specimens were fabricated from heat-pressed LDS and ZLS (n = 15) with a diameter of 10mm and a thickness of 3mm. LDS and ZLS specimens were veneered with fluorapatite glass ceramic (FLGC) and leucite-reinforced feldspathic porcelain (LFP), respectively. The veneering material was condensed in a mold and fired on the glass ceramic materials to form a disk with a diameter of 3mm and a thickness of 2mm. Specimens were subjected to shear force in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute until failure of the specimens. The failed specimens were examined under an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope to analyze the mode of failure. Data were analyzed using independent t-test. RESULTS. LDS (29.75 MPa) showed a statistically significant higher shear bond strength than that ZLS (21.96 MPa) ( P value<.05). LDS group showed predominantly cohesive failure, while ZLS group showed mixed adhesive/cohesive failure. CONCLUSIONS. Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate complex failed at lower load levels compared to the lithium disilicate complex. The predominantly cohesive failure mode in LDS specimens reflects the higher bond strength that surpassed the cohesive strength of the heat-pressed ceramic and the veneering material
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信