ReCRec:推理有偏差推荐的内隐反馈原因

IF 5.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Siyi Lin, Sheng Zhou, Jiawei Chen, Yan Feng, Qihao Shi, Chun Chen, Ying Li, Can Wang
{"title":"ReCRec:推理有偏差推荐的内隐反馈原因","authors":"Siyi Lin, Sheng Zhou, Jiawei Chen, Yan Feng, Qihao Shi, Chun Chen, Ying Li, Can Wang","doi":"10.1145/3672275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Implicit feedback (\n e.g\n ., user clicks) is widely used in building recommender systems (RS). However, the inherent notorious\n exposure bias\n significantly affects recommendation performance. Exposure bias refers a phenomenon that implicit feedback is influenced by user exposure, and does not precisely reflect user preference. Current methods for addressing exposure bias primarily reduce confidence in unclicked data, employ exposure models, or leverage propensity scores. Regrettably, these approaches often lead to biased estimations or elevated model variance, yielding sub-optimal results.\n \n \n To overcome these limitations, we propose a new method\n ReCRec\n that\n Re\n asons the\n C\n auses behind the implicit feedback for debiased\n Rec\n ommendation. ReCRec identifies three scenarios behind unclicked data —\n i.e.\n , unexposed, dislike or a combination of both. A reasoning module is employed to infer the category to which each instance pertains. Consequently, the model is capable of extracting reliable positive and negative signals from unclicked data, thereby facilitating more accurate learning of user preferences. We also conduct thorough theoretical analyses to demonstrate the debiased nature and low variance of ReCRec. Extensive experiments on both semi-synthetic and real-world datasets validate its superiority over state-of-the-art methods.\n","PeriodicalId":50936,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ReCRec: Reasoning the Causes of Implicit Feedback for Debiased Recommendation\",\"authors\":\"Siyi Lin, Sheng Zhou, Jiawei Chen, Yan Feng, Qihao Shi, Chun Chen, Ying Li, Can Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3672275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Implicit feedback (\\n e.g\\n ., user clicks) is widely used in building recommender systems (RS). However, the inherent notorious\\n exposure bias\\n significantly affects recommendation performance. Exposure bias refers a phenomenon that implicit feedback is influenced by user exposure, and does not precisely reflect user preference. Current methods for addressing exposure bias primarily reduce confidence in unclicked data, employ exposure models, or leverage propensity scores. Regrettably, these approaches often lead to biased estimations or elevated model variance, yielding sub-optimal results.\\n \\n \\n To overcome these limitations, we propose a new method\\n ReCRec\\n that\\n Re\\n asons the\\n C\\n auses behind the implicit feedback for debiased\\n Rec\\n ommendation. ReCRec identifies three scenarios behind unclicked data —\\n i.e.\\n , unexposed, dislike or a combination of both. A reasoning module is employed to infer the category to which each instance pertains. Consequently, the model is capable of extracting reliable positive and negative signals from unclicked data, thereby facilitating more accurate learning of user preferences. We also conduct thorough theoretical analyses to demonstrate the debiased nature and low variance of ReCRec. Extensive experiments on both semi-synthetic and real-world datasets validate its superiority over state-of-the-art methods.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":50936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Information Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3672275\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3672275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

隐式反馈(如用户点击)被广泛用于构建推荐系统(RS)。然而,与生俱来的暴露偏差会严重影响推荐性能。曝光偏差指的是隐式反馈受用户曝光的影响,不能准确反映用户偏好的现象。目前解决暴露偏差的方法主要是降低未点击数据的置信度、采用暴露模型或利用倾向分数。遗憾的是,这些方法往往会导致估计偏差或模型方差增大,从而产生次优结果。 为了克服这些局限性,我们提出了一种新方法 ReCRec,该方法能找出有偏差的推荐隐含反馈背后的原因。ReCRec 可识别未点击数据背后的三种情况--即未曝光、不喜欢或两者兼而有之。推理模块用于推断每个实例所属的类别。因此,该模型能够从未曾点击的数据中提取可靠的积极和消极信号,从而促进更准确地学习用户偏好。我们还进行了深入的理论分析,以证明 ReCRec 的去偏差性和低方差性。在半合成数据集和真实数据集上进行的大量实验验证了其优于最先进方法的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ReCRec: Reasoning the Causes of Implicit Feedback for Debiased Recommendation
Implicit feedback ( e.g ., user clicks) is widely used in building recommender systems (RS). However, the inherent notorious exposure bias significantly affects recommendation performance. Exposure bias refers a phenomenon that implicit feedback is influenced by user exposure, and does not precisely reflect user preference. Current methods for addressing exposure bias primarily reduce confidence in unclicked data, employ exposure models, or leverage propensity scores. Regrettably, these approaches often lead to biased estimations or elevated model variance, yielding sub-optimal results. To overcome these limitations, we propose a new method ReCRec that Re asons the C auses behind the implicit feedback for debiased Rec ommendation. ReCRec identifies three scenarios behind unclicked data — i.e. , unexposed, dislike or a combination of both. A reasoning module is employed to infer the category to which each instance pertains. Consequently, the model is capable of extracting reliable positive and negative signals from unclicked data, thereby facilitating more accurate learning of user preferences. We also conduct thorough theoretical analyses to demonstrate the debiased nature and low variance of ReCRec. Extensive experiments on both semi-synthetic and real-world datasets validate its superiority over state-of-the-art methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
ACM Transactions on Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
165
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; accounts of applications of existing information retrieval techniques that shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of the techniques; formalization of new information retrieval or information seeking tasks and of methods for evaluating the performance on those tasks; development of content (text, image, speech, video, etc) analysis methods to support information retrieval and information seeking; development of computational models of user information preferences and interaction behaviors; creation and analysis of evaluation methodologies for information retrieval and information seeking; or surveys of existing work that propose a significant synthesis. The information retrieval scope of ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) appeals to industry practitioners for its wealth of creative ideas, and to academic researchers for its descriptions of their colleagues'' work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信