干预措施对乐观和抑郁的同时影响:荟萃分析

Nicola S. Schutte, John M. Malouff
{"title":"干预措施对乐观和抑郁的同时影响:荟萃分析","authors":"Nicola S. Schutte,&nbsp;John M. Malouff","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The positive psychology approach to mental-health-related interventions suggests that a dual focus on positive and problematic characteristics is beneficial and that positive and negative characteristics interact. The present study explored the link between optimism and depression outcomes in intervention studies that assessed both optimism and depression outcomes. A meta-analysis examined effect sizes for depression and optimism and links between depression and optimism outcomes. Eighteen studies with a total of 2153 participants were included. Across studies the weighted effect sizes for the impact of interventions on both depression (<i>g</i> = 0.46) and optimism (<i>g</i> = 0.38) were significant. Optimism and depression outcomes were associated with one another (<i>r</i>(17) = 0.58). Meta-regression analyses also indicated linkages between the two outcomes in that the optimism effect sizes moderated depression effect sizes and depression effect sizes moderated optimism effect sizes. The results of the study lend support to a dual focus on positive and problematic characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.79","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The simultaneous impact of interventions on optimism and depression: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Nicola S. Schutte,&nbsp;John M. Malouff\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mhs2.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The positive psychology approach to mental-health-related interventions suggests that a dual focus on positive and problematic characteristics is beneficial and that positive and negative characteristics interact. The present study explored the link between optimism and depression outcomes in intervention studies that assessed both optimism and depression outcomes. A meta-analysis examined effect sizes for depression and optimism and links between depression and optimism outcomes. Eighteen studies with a total of 2153 participants were included. Across studies the weighted effect sizes for the impact of interventions on both depression (<i>g</i> = 0.46) and optimism (<i>g</i> = 0.38) were significant. Optimism and depression outcomes were associated with one another (<i>r</i>(17) = 0.58). Meta-regression analyses also indicated linkages between the two outcomes in that the optimism effect sizes moderated depression effect sizes and depression effect sizes moderated optimism effect sizes. The results of the study lend support to a dual focus on positive and problematic characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental health science\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.79\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental health science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对心理健康相关干预采取积极心理学方法表明,对积极特征和问题特征的双重关注是有益的,而且积极特征和消极特征是相互影响的。本研究探讨了同时评估乐观和抑郁结果的干预研究中乐观与抑郁结果之间的联系。荟萃分析检查了抑郁和乐观的效应大小以及抑郁和乐观结果之间的联系。18项研究共纳入了2153名参与者。在所有研究中,干预措施对抑郁(g = 0.46)和乐观(g = 0.38)的影响的加权效应大小都很显著。乐观和抑郁的结果相互关联(r(17) = 0.58)。元回归分析也表明了这两种结果之间的联系,即乐观的效应大小调节抑郁的效应大小,抑郁的效应大小调节乐观的效应大小。研究结果支持对积极特征和问题特征的双重关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The simultaneous impact of interventions on optimism and depression: A meta-analysis

The simultaneous impact of interventions on optimism and depression: A meta-analysis

The positive psychology approach to mental-health-related interventions suggests that a dual focus on positive and problematic characteristics is beneficial and that positive and negative characteristics interact. The present study explored the link between optimism and depression outcomes in intervention studies that assessed both optimism and depression outcomes. A meta-analysis examined effect sizes for depression and optimism and links between depression and optimism outcomes. Eighteen studies with a total of 2153 participants were included. Across studies the weighted effect sizes for the impact of interventions on both depression (g = 0.46) and optimism (g = 0.38) were significant. Optimism and depression outcomes were associated with one another (r(17) = 0.58). Meta-regression analyses also indicated linkages between the two outcomes in that the optimism effect sizes moderated depression effect sizes and depression effect sizes moderated optimism effect sizes. The results of the study lend support to a dual focus on positive and problematic characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信