评估氨甲环酸与改良克利格曼配方在治疗黄褐斑中的疗效比较

Meda Susmitha, Kethireddy S. Divya, Dasika Subbarao, Bendapudi Venkata Ramachandra
{"title":"评估氨甲环酸与改良克利格曼配方在治疗黄褐斑中的疗效比较","authors":"Meda Susmitha, Kethireddy S. Divya, Dasika Subbarao, Bendapudi Venkata Ramachandra","doi":"10.4103/pigmentinternational_55_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Facial melanoses (FM) are a common presentation in Indian patients, causing cosmetic disfigurement with considerable psychological impact. Melasma is an acquired non-inflammatory hypermelanosis of multifactorial etiology with significant cosmetic deformity. Different treatment modalities have been tried in different studies with varying outcomes. Recent clinical trials with tranexamic acid (TXA) are promising. Objective: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of TXA topical application after micro-needling and intralesional TXA with the modified Kligman formula in the management of melasma. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, open-label study with a sample size of 45 patients with melasma fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomly divided into three groups of 15 each. Group A individuals were advised to apply a modified Kligman formula daily at night for 3 months, Group B individuals weekly micro-needling followed by TXA application for 3 months, and Group C individuals intralesional TXA (4 mg/mL) weekly for 3 months. Clinical and dermoscopic images were taken at each visit, including modified Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) scoring, patient global assessment, and physician global assessment to assess the clinical response. Results: Group A showed a 42% improvement in MASI score by the end of 12 weeks, Group B showed a 30% improvement, and Group C showed a 36% improvement. When statistically compared with the Analysis of Variance test, there was no significant difference (P = 0.62) between the three groups. However, in individual groups, there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in MASI at 0 and 12 weeks. Dermoscopic images showed perilesional hypopigmentation and telangiectasias with a modified Kligman formula, which was not seen with TXA. Patient assessment score revealed satisfaction with the modified Kligman formula because of home application and lack of pain. Conclusion: The modified Kligman formula is found to be superior in the treatment of melasma, because of the synergistic activity of its components. However, it has its demerits of long-term usage like hypopigmentation and telangiectasias. Hence, TXA that showed comparable results with the Kligman formula can be used either as a primary modality or as an adjuvant supportive therapy for maintenance.","PeriodicalId":32636,"journal":{"name":"Pigment International","volume":"118 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of tranexamic acid compared to modified Kligman formula in the management of melasma\",\"authors\":\"Meda Susmitha, Kethireddy S. Divya, Dasika Subbarao, Bendapudi Venkata Ramachandra\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/pigmentinternational_55_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background: Facial melanoses (FM) are a common presentation in Indian patients, causing cosmetic disfigurement with considerable psychological impact. Melasma is an acquired non-inflammatory hypermelanosis of multifactorial etiology with significant cosmetic deformity. Different treatment modalities have been tried in different studies with varying outcomes. Recent clinical trials with tranexamic acid (TXA) are promising. Objective: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of TXA topical application after micro-needling and intralesional TXA with the modified Kligman formula in the management of melasma. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, open-label study with a sample size of 45 patients with melasma fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomly divided into three groups of 15 each. Group A individuals were advised to apply a modified Kligman formula daily at night for 3 months, Group B individuals weekly micro-needling followed by TXA application for 3 months, and Group C individuals intralesional TXA (4 mg/mL) weekly for 3 months. Clinical and dermoscopic images were taken at each visit, including modified Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) scoring, patient global assessment, and physician global assessment to assess the clinical response. Results: Group A showed a 42% improvement in MASI score by the end of 12 weeks, Group B showed a 30% improvement, and Group C showed a 36% improvement. When statistically compared with the Analysis of Variance test, there was no significant difference (P = 0.62) between the three groups. However, in individual groups, there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in MASI at 0 and 12 weeks. Dermoscopic images showed perilesional hypopigmentation and telangiectasias with a modified Kligman formula, which was not seen with TXA. Patient assessment score revealed satisfaction with the modified Kligman formula because of home application and lack of pain. Conclusion: The modified Kligman formula is found to be superior in the treatment of melasma, because of the synergistic activity of its components. However, it has its demerits of long-term usage like hypopigmentation and telangiectasias. Hence, TXA that showed comparable results with the Kligman formula can be used either as a primary modality or as an adjuvant supportive therapy for maintenance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pigment International\",\"volume\":\"118 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pigment International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/pigmentinternational_55_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pigment International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/pigmentinternational_55_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:面部黑色素瘤(FM)是印度患者的常见病,会造成容貌毁损和严重的心理影响。黄褐斑是一种获得性非炎症性黑素沉着症,其病因是多因素的,会造成严重的外观畸形。不同的研究尝试了不同的治疗方法,但结果各不相同。最近使用氨甲环酸(TXA)进行的临床试验很有希望。研究目的比较微针注射后局部使用氨甲环酸(TXA)和使用改良的 Kligman 方剂鞘内注射 TXA 治疗黄褐斑的疗效。材料与方法:这是一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签研究,样本量为 45 名符合纳入和排除标准的黄褐斑患者。他们被随机分为三组,每组 15 人。A 组建议患者每天晚上使用改良版克利格曼配方,持续 3 个月;B 组建议患者每周进行微针注射,然后使用 TXA,持续 3 个月;C 组建议患者每周注射 TXA(4 毫克/毫升),持续 3 个月。每次就诊时均拍摄临床和皮肤镜图像,包括改良黄褐斑面积严重程度指数(MASI)评分、患者总体评估和医生总体评估,以评估临床反应。结果12 周后,A 组的 MASI 评分提高了 42%,B 组提高了 30%,C 组提高了 36%。经方差分析检验进行统计比较,三组之间无明显差异(P = 0.62)。但在 0 周和 12 周时,各组的 MASI 有明显差异(P < 0.05)。皮肤镜图像显示,使用改良 Kligman 公式后,皮肤周围会出现色素沉着和毛细血管扩张,而使用 TXA 则不会出现这种情况。患者评估得分显示,他们对改良 Kligman 配方感到满意,因为可以在家使用,而且没有疼痛感。结论:改良版 Kligman 配方在治疗黄褐斑方面具有优势,因为其成分具有协同作用。然而,它也有长期使用的缺点,如色素沉着和毛细血管扩张。因此,TXA 与 Kligman 方剂的疗效相当,既可作为主要治疗方法,也可作为辅助支持疗法用于维持治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of tranexamic acid compared to modified Kligman formula in the management of melasma
Background: Facial melanoses (FM) are a common presentation in Indian patients, causing cosmetic disfigurement with considerable psychological impact. Melasma is an acquired non-inflammatory hypermelanosis of multifactorial etiology with significant cosmetic deformity. Different treatment modalities have been tried in different studies with varying outcomes. Recent clinical trials with tranexamic acid (TXA) are promising. Objective: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of TXA topical application after micro-needling and intralesional TXA with the modified Kligman formula in the management of melasma. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, open-label study with a sample size of 45 patients with melasma fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomly divided into three groups of 15 each. Group A individuals were advised to apply a modified Kligman formula daily at night for 3 months, Group B individuals weekly micro-needling followed by TXA application for 3 months, and Group C individuals intralesional TXA (4 mg/mL) weekly for 3 months. Clinical and dermoscopic images were taken at each visit, including modified Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) scoring, patient global assessment, and physician global assessment to assess the clinical response. Results: Group A showed a 42% improvement in MASI score by the end of 12 weeks, Group B showed a 30% improvement, and Group C showed a 36% improvement. When statistically compared with the Analysis of Variance test, there was no significant difference (P = 0.62) between the three groups. However, in individual groups, there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in MASI at 0 and 12 weeks. Dermoscopic images showed perilesional hypopigmentation and telangiectasias with a modified Kligman formula, which was not seen with TXA. Patient assessment score revealed satisfaction with the modified Kligman formula because of home application and lack of pain. Conclusion: The modified Kligman formula is found to be superior in the treatment of melasma, because of the synergistic activity of its components. However, it has its demerits of long-term usage like hypopigmentation and telangiectasias. Hence, TXA that showed comparable results with the Kligman formula can be used either as a primary modality or as an adjuvant supportive therapy for maintenance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信