分析师预测修正的一致性和逆转:股市效率的证据

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Lin Chen, Dongfang Nie, Yuan Shi, Yinghong Zhang
{"title":"分析师预测修正的一致性和逆转:股市效率的证据","authors":"Lin Chen,&nbsp;Dongfang Nie,&nbsp;Yuan Shi,&nbsp;Yinghong Zhang","doi":"10.1002/jcaf.22744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study reexamines the information content and market price discovery associated with individual analysts' earnings forecast revisions. We refine the definition of high-innovation revisions as high-innovation consistent forecast revisions and high-innovation reversal forecast revisions. Cross-sectional analysis shows that high-innovation reversal good (bad) news revisions, although having larger forecast changes, cause fewer upward (downward) post-revision price shifts than high-innovation consistent good (bad) news revisions. We also find that the market can distinguish which group of analysts provides more useful information about firms’ true value, but it takes some time for the market to digest this useful information.</p>","PeriodicalId":44561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","volume":"36 1","pages":"124-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyst forecast revision consistency and reversal: Evidence of stock market efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Lin Chen,&nbsp;Dongfang Nie,&nbsp;Yuan Shi,&nbsp;Yinghong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcaf.22744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study reexamines the information content and market price discovery associated with individual analysts' earnings forecast revisions. We refine the definition of high-innovation revisions as high-innovation consistent forecast revisions and high-innovation reversal forecast revisions. Cross-sectional analysis shows that high-innovation reversal good (bad) news revisions, although having larger forecast changes, cause fewer upward (downward) post-revision price shifts than high-innovation consistent good (bad) news revisions. We also find that the market can distinguish which group of analysts provides more useful information about firms’ true value, but it takes some time for the market to digest this useful information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"124-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22744\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究重新审视了与个别分析师盈利预测修正相关的信息内容和市场价格发现。我们将高创新修正的定义细化为高创新一致预测修正和高创新反转预测修正。横截面分析表明,高创新反转利好(利空)消息修正虽然预测变化较大,但与高创新一致利好(利空)消息修正相比,修正后价格向上(向下)变动较少。我们还发现,市场可以分辨出哪一组分析师提供了更多关于公司真实价值的有用信息,但市场需要一些时间来消化这些有用信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyst forecast revision consistency and reversal: Evidence of stock market efficiency

This study reexamines the information content and market price discovery associated with individual analysts' earnings forecast revisions. We refine the definition of high-innovation revisions as high-innovation consistent forecast revisions and high-innovation reversal forecast revisions. Cross-sectional analysis shows that high-innovation reversal good (bad) news revisions, although having larger forecast changes, cause fewer upward (downward) post-revision price shifts than high-innovation consistent good (bad) news revisions. We also find that the market can distinguish which group of analysts provides more useful information about firms’ true value, but it takes some time for the market to digest this useful information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信