儿童对社会工作者提问做法的看法

K. M. Sørensen, Charlotte Bredahl Jacobsen, Cecilie Koustrup
{"title":"儿童对社会工作者提问做法的看法","authors":"K. M. Sørensen, Charlotte Bredahl Jacobsen, Cecilie Koustrup","doi":"10.1111/cfs.13217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three tendencies currently influence social workers' questioning practices at statutory meetings with children in out‐of‐home care: an awareness that the children may have unmet needs that social workers should detect and react upon the introduction of screening instruments to social work and changes in questioning practices due to a quest for greater child participation. This project explores children's preferences about social workers' questioning practices given these trends. A total of 18 Danish children aged 10–13 participated in three separate panels in 2020 and 2021. Each panel met up on three Saturday afternoons to discuss and offer opinions on subjects that included social workers' questioning practices with or without the use of screening questionnaires. According to the children, social workers need to reach a better balance between children's right to privacy and their need for help. They want fewer people ‘meddling in their lives’, more privacy and to be questioned only when social workers can act very concretely to help them solve a problem. Children's preferences indicate that we should adjust social work questioning practices with children placed in out‐of‐home care in general and our use of screening instruments in social work in particular.","PeriodicalId":503608,"journal":{"name":"Child & Family Social Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children's Perspective on Social Workers' Questioning Practices\",\"authors\":\"K. M. Sørensen, Charlotte Bredahl Jacobsen, Cecilie Koustrup\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cfs.13217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three tendencies currently influence social workers' questioning practices at statutory meetings with children in out‐of‐home care: an awareness that the children may have unmet needs that social workers should detect and react upon the introduction of screening instruments to social work and changes in questioning practices due to a quest for greater child participation. This project explores children's preferences about social workers' questioning practices given these trends. A total of 18 Danish children aged 10–13 participated in three separate panels in 2020 and 2021. Each panel met up on three Saturday afternoons to discuss and offer opinions on subjects that included social workers' questioning practices with or without the use of screening questionnaires. According to the children, social workers need to reach a better balance between children's right to privacy and their need for help. They want fewer people ‘meddling in their lives’, more privacy and to be questioned only when social workers can act very concretely to help them solve a problem. Children's preferences indicate that we should adjust social work questioning practices with children placed in out‐of‐home care in general and our use of screening instruments in social work in particular.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Family Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前有三种趋势影响着社会工作者在与家庭外照料儿童法定会面时的提问方式:意识到儿童可能有未得到满足的需求,社会工作者应发现这些需求,并在社会工作中引入筛查工具后做出反应;以及由于寻求更多的儿童参与而改变提问方式。本项目探讨了在这些趋势下儿童对社工提问方式的偏好。2020 年和 2021 年,共有 18 名 10-13 岁的丹麦儿童参加了三个不同的小组。每个小组在三个周六下午举行会议,就社工是否使用筛查问卷进行询问的问题进行讨论并发表意见。孩子们认为,社工需要在儿童的隐私权和他们对帮助的需求之间取得更好的平衡。他们希望 "干涉他们生活 "的人少一些,希望有更多的隐私,并希望只有在社工能够采取非常具体的行动帮助他们解决问题时,他们才会被询问。儿童的喜好表明,我们应该调整社会工作对被安置在家庭外照料的儿童的提问方式,特别是在社会工作中使用筛查工具的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Children's Perspective on Social Workers' Questioning Practices
Three tendencies currently influence social workers' questioning practices at statutory meetings with children in out‐of‐home care: an awareness that the children may have unmet needs that social workers should detect and react upon the introduction of screening instruments to social work and changes in questioning practices due to a quest for greater child participation. This project explores children's preferences about social workers' questioning practices given these trends. A total of 18 Danish children aged 10–13 participated in three separate panels in 2020 and 2021. Each panel met up on three Saturday afternoons to discuss and offer opinions on subjects that included social workers' questioning practices with or without the use of screening questionnaires. According to the children, social workers need to reach a better balance between children's right to privacy and their need for help. They want fewer people ‘meddling in their lives’, more privacy and to be questioned only when social workers can act very concretely to help them solve a problem. Children's preferences indicate that we should adjust social work questioning practices with children placed in out‐of‐home care in general and our use of screening instruments in social work in particular.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信