影响婴儿猝死综合症(SIDS)的干扰因素系统回顾

A. Noor, Areej Kainat, Ahmad Hanan Shah, Ahmad Safiyan, H. Shahzadi, Iram Yousaf, Muhammad Jawad Akbar, Muhammad Humza Faran, Sana Iqbal, Eman Mustafa, Noor-e-Hizba Chaudhary, Abdulrehman Abid, Muhammad Zahid Iqbal
{"title":"影响婴儿猝死综合症(SIDS)的干扰因素系统回顾","authors":"A. Noor, Areej Kainat, Ahmad Hanan Shah, Ahmad Safiyan, H. Shahzadi, Iram Yousaf, Muhammad Jawad Akbar, Muhammad Humza Faran, Sana Iqbal, Eman Mustafa, Noor-e-Hizba Chaudhary, Abdulrehman Abid, Muhammad Zahid Iqbal","doi":"10.9734/jpri/2024/v36i87554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) remains the leading cause of infant mortality, affecting countries worldwide, including both wealthy and developing nations. Many confounders are responsible for SIDS, which still can be avoided, and the prevalence can stop to save infant deaths. The present systematic review has been conducted to distinguish those responsible factors. The objective of the current systematic review was to identify those confounders and corelate them with SIDS. For conducting the current systematic review, the basic online scientific data bases i.e., (Scopus, ProQuest, Science-Direct, Web of Science along with PubMed) were utilized for searching along with the manual research on Google Scholar. The present systematic review was in line with ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards and recommendations. A 20-point appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) was used to critically evaluate the quality of the used studies. Additionally, applying the framework of PECO-S (Population -Exposure -Comparison -Outcome -Study design) numerous observational studies were enrolled for this review. Out of 1989 studies obtained, 24 studies fulfill the inclusion criteria and are thus included in the present review. The original research studies included in the present systematic review were all in “English” language published during the time duration of 2015-2023. Overall, 24 research papers covering 11 different countries’ sample population were included. More number of infants died due to SIDS in the age group of 2-4 months. Key confounders associated with SIDS include parental smoking (64.3%), low-income status (56.9%), bed-sharing (58.7%), and non-breastfeeding (over 90%). Additionally, maternal education, genetic factors, and inequalities in living conditions were identified as significant contributors to SIDS. The review underscores the importance of targeted interventions to address these confounders, such as promoting breastfeeding, reducing parental smoking, and improving maternal education and socioeconomic conditions. By addressing these factors, the incidence of SIDS can be significantly reduced, ultimately saving the lives of infants globally.","PeriodicalId":506675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International","volume":"113 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Confounders Effecting on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)\",\"authors\":\"A. Noor, Areej Kainat, Ahmad Hanan Shah, Ahmad Safiyan, H. Shahzadi, Iram Yousaf, Muhammad Jawad Akbar, Muhammad Humza Faran, Sana Iqbal, Eman Mustafa, Noor-e-Hizba Chaudhary, Abdulrehman Abid, Muhammad Zahid Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/jpri/2024/v36i87554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) remains the leading cause of infant mortality, affecting countries worldwide, including both wealthy and developing nations. Many confounders are responsible for SIDS, which still can be avoided, and the prevalence can stop to save infant deaths. The present systematic review has been conducted to distinguish those responsible factors. The objective of the current systematic review was to identify those confounders and corelate them with SIDS. For conducting the current systematic review, the basic online scientific data bases i.e., (Scopus, ProQuest, Science-Direct, Web of Science along with PubMed) were utilized for searching along with the manual research on Google Scholar. The present systematic review was in line with ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards and recommendations. A 20-point appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) was used to critically evaluate the quality of the used studies. Additionally, applying the framework of PECO-S (Population -Exposure -Comparison -Outcome -Study design) numerous observational studies were enrolled for this review. Out of 1989 studies obtained, 24 studies fulfill the inclusion criteria and are thus included in the present review. The original research studies included in the present systematic review were all in “English” language published during the time duration of 2015-2023. Overall, 24 research papers covering 11 different countries’ sample population were included. More number of infants died due to SIDS in the age group of 2-4 months. Key confounders associated with SIDS include parental smoking (64.3%), low-income status (56.9%), bed-sharing (58.7%), and non-breastfeeding (over 90%). Additionally, maternal education, genetic factors, and inequalities in living conditions were identified as significant contributors to SIDS. The review underscores the importance of targeted interventions to address these confounders, such as promoting breastfeeding, reducing parental smoking, and improving maternal education and socioeconomic conditions. By addressing these factors, the incidence of SIDS can be significantly reduced, ultimately saving the lives of infants globally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International\",\"volume\":\"113 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2024/v36i87554\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2024/v36i87554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

婴儿猝死综合症(SIDS)仍然是婴儿死亡的主要原因,影响着世界各国,包括富裕国家和发展中国家。导致婴儿猝死综合症的因素有很多,但这些因素仍然是可以避免的,而且可以阻止婴儿猝死综合症的流行,从而挽救婴儿的生命。本系统综述旨在区分这些致病因素。本次系统综述的目的是确定这些混杂因素,并将它们与婴儿猝死综合症联系起来。为了进行本次系统性综述,我们使用了基本的在线科学数据库(Scopus、ProQuest、Science-Direct、Web of Science 和 PubMed)进行搜索,并在 Google Scholar 上进行了人工研究。本系统综述符合 "系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)"的标准和建议。采用了 20 点横断面研究评估工具(AXIS 工具)来严格评估所采用研究的质量。此外,本综述还采用了 PECO-S(人群-暴露-比较-结果-研究设计)框架,纳入了大量观察性研究。在获得的 1989 项研究中,有 24 项研究符合纳入标准,因此被纳入本综述。本系统综述所纳入的原始研究均为 2015-2023 年间发表的 "英语 "研究。总共纳入了 24 篇研究论文,涵盖 11 个不同国家的样本人群。2-4个月大的婴儿死于婴儿猝死综合症的人数较多。与婴儿猝死症相关的主要混杂因素包括父母吸烟(64.3%)、低收入状况(56.9%)、同床育儿(58.7%)和非母乳喂养(90%以上)。此外,孕产妇教育、遗传因素和生活条件不平等也是导致婴儿猝死综合症的重要因素。综述强调了针对这些混杂因素采取针对性干预措施的重要性,如提倡母乳喂养、减少父母吸烟、改善产妇教育和社会经济条件。通过解决这些因素,可以大大降低婴儿猝死症的发病率,最终挽救全球婴儿的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review of Confounders Effecting on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) remains the leading cause of infant mortality, affecting countries worldwide, including both wealthy and developing nations. Many confounders are responsible for SIDS, which still can be avoided, and the prevalence can stop to save infant deaths. The present systematic review has been conducted to distinguish those responsible factors. The objective of the current systematic review was to identify those confounders and corelate them with SIDS. For conducting the current systematic review, the basic online scientific data bases i.e., (Scopus, ProQuest, Science-Direct, Web of Science along with PubMed) were utilized for searching along with the manual research on Google Scholar. The present systematic review was in line with ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards and recommendations. A 20-point appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) was used to critically evaluate the quality of the used studies. Additionally, applying the framework of PECO-S (Population -Exposure -Comparison -Outcome -Study design) numerous observational studies were enrolled for this review. Out of 1989 studies obtained, 24 studies fulfill the inclusion criteria and are thus included in the present review. The original research studies included in the present systematic review were all in “English” language published during the time duration of 2015-2023. Overall, 24 research papers covering 11 different countries’ sample population were included. More number of infants died due to SIDS in the age group of 2-4 months. Key confounders associated with SIDS include parental smoking (64.3%), low-income status (56.9%), bed-sharing (58.7%), and non-breastfeeding (over 90%). Additionally, maternal education, genetic factors, and inequalities in living conditions were identified as significant contributors to SIDS. The review underscores the importance of targeted interventions to address these confounders, such as promoting breastfeeding, reducing parental smoking, and improving maternal education and socioeconomic conditions. By addressing these factors, the incidence of SIDS can be significantly reduced, ultimately saving the lives of infants globally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信