{"title":"哈耶克的文化进化论与进化心理学(第二部分)","authors":"R. I. Kapeliushnikov","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2024-7-25-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper highlights the theory of cultural evolution by F. A. Hayek, which in retrospect appears as a complex and deep system, in many respects anticipating the ideas of modern evolutionary psychology. The second part dicusses its key element — the idea of group selection, which Hayek used to explain why, in the long-run evolutionary perspective, more efficient social orders capable of providing a higher living standard and supporting a larger population are more likely to survive. This became grounds for his accusations of shifting onto the position of methodological holism. However, under closer examination group selection and methodological individualism turn out to be quite compatible, appearing in Hayek’s understanding as two aspects of a unite explanatory scheme.","PeriodicalId":45534,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The theory of cultural evolution by F. A. Hayek and evolutionary psychology (Part two)\",\"authors\":\"R. I. Kapeliushnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.32609/0042-8736-2024-7-25-52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper highlights the theory of cultural evolution by F. A. Hayek, which in retrospect appears as a complex and deep system, in many respects anticipating the ideas of modern evolutionary psychology. The second part dicusses its key element — the idea of group selection, which Hayek used to explain why, in the long-run evolutionary perspective, more efficient social orders capable of providing a higher living standard and supporting a larger population are more likely to survive. This became grounds for his accusations of shifting onto the position of methodological holism. However, under closer examination group selection and methodological individualism turn out to be quite compatible, appearing in Hayek’s understanding as two aspects of a unite explanatory scheme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Ekonomiki\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Ekonomiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-7-25-52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-7-25-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文重点介绍了 F. A. 哈耶克的文化进化理论,回过头来看,该理论是一个复杂而深刻的体系,在许多方面预示了现代进化心理学的思想。第二部分讨论了其关键要素--群体选择的思想,哈耶克用这一思想解释了为什么从长期进化的角度来看,能够提供更高的生活水平和支持更多人口的更有效率的社会秩序更有可能生存下来。这成为他指责自己转向方法论整体主义立场的理由。然而,仔细研究后会发现,群体选择与方法论个人主义是完全一致的,在哈耶克的理解中,两者是统一解释方案的两个方面。
The theory of cultural evolution by F. A. Hayek and evolutionary psychology (Part two)
The paper highlights the theory of cultural evolution by F. A. Hayek, which in retrospect appears as a complex and deep system, in many respects anticipating the ideas of modern evolutionary psychology. The second part dicusses its key element — the idea of group selection, which Hayek used to explain why, in the long-run evolutionary perspective, more efficient social orders capable of providing a higher living standard and supporting a larger population are more likely to survive. This became grounds for his accusations of shifting onto the position of methodological holism. However, under closer examination group selection and methodological individualism turn out to be quite compatible, appearing in Hayek’s understanding as two aspects of a unite explanatory scheme.