基于染料的重组酶辅助扩增测定,提高了灵敏度和特异性

iLABMED Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1002/ila2.51
Zijin Zhao, Yanbo You, Shaowei Hua, Xinxin Shen, Lingjun Li, Xuejun Ma
{"title":"基于染料的重组酶辅助扩增测定,提高了灵敏度和特异性","authors":"Zijin Zhao, Yanbo You, Shaowei Hua, Xinxin Shen, Lingjun Li, Xuejun Ma","doi":"10.1002/ila2.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fluorescent recombinase‐aided amplification (RAA) assays are increasingly being used in the detection of a variety of pathogens and have the advantages of rapidity and simplicity and similar sensitivity and specificity, compared with real‐time PCR (qPCR) assays, but they require a complex probe design. To eliminate the addition of fluorescent probes for RAA, an EvaGreen dye‐based recombinase‐aided amplification (EvaGreen‐RAA) assay using self‐avoiding molecular recognition system (SAMRS) primers was developed.The SAMRS primers effectively avoided the production of primer dimers, thus improving the detection sensitivity, while EvaGreen dye was used to quantitatively measure the amplified products in real time. Using Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Listeria monocytogenes (LM) as examples, EvaGreen‐RAA with SAMRS primers was developed. As a reference and comparison, a traditional fluorescence probe RAA method and a RAA with SAMRS primers (SAMRS‐RAA) for detecting SA and LM were also investigated. Serial dilutions of recombinant plasmids were used to evaluate the sensitivity of the assays. Unenriched and enriched simulated milk samples were used to evaluate the limits of detection (LOD) of these methods. Using high‐resolution melting (HRM) was used to explore the sensitivity of the dual EvaGreen‐RAA assay.The sensitivity of the fluorescent RAA method for detecting SA and LM was 10 copies/μL using plasmids and the sensitivity of the SAMRS‐RAA and EvaGreen‐RAA for detecting SA and LM plasmids was 1 copies/μL. The LOD values of the EvaGreen‐RAA for SA and LM in unenriched simulated milk samples were 100 and 50 CFU/mL, respectively, and the LOD value for both SA and LM using enriched simulated milk samples was 10 CFU/mL. EvaGreen‐RAA had linear amplification in real time in the range of 1–105 copies/μL of the plasmids of SA and LM. The sensitivity of the dual EvaGreen‐RAA assay for SA and LM was estimated to be 102 CFU/mL.A real‐time quantitative EvaGreen‐RAA method for detecting SA and LM was developed, which eliminates the need to design complex RAA probes. This dye‐based RAA with SARMS primers provides a new strategy for simplifying fluorescence probe RAA and allowing the detection of multiple pathogens, which has many potential applications.","PeriodicalId":100656,"journal":{"name":"iLABMED","volume":"55 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dye‐based recombinase‐aided amplification assay with enhanced sensitivity and specificity\",\"authors\":\"Zijin Zhao, Yanbo You, Shaowei Hua, Xinxin Shen, Lingjun Li, Xuejun Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ila2.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fluorescent recombinase‐aided amplification (RAA) assays are increasingly being used in the detection of a variety of pathogens and have the advantages of rapidity and simplicity and similar sensitivity and specificity, compared with real‐time PCR (qPCR) assays, but they require a complex probe design. To eliminate the addition of fluorescent probes for RAA, an EvaGreen dye‐based recombinase‐aided amplification (EvaGreen‐RAA) assay using self‐avoiding molecular recognition system (SAMRS) primers was developed.The SAMRS primers effectively avoided the production of primer dimers, thus improving the detection sensitivity, while EvaGreen dye was used to quantitatively measure the amplified products in real time. Using Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Listeria monocytogenes (LM) as examples, EvaGreen‐RAA with SAMRS primers was developed. As a reference and comparison, a traditional fluorescence probe RAA method and a RAA with SAMRS primers (SAMRS‐RAA) for detecting SA and LM were also investigated. Serial dilutions of recombinant plasmids were used to evaluate the sensitivity of the assays. Unenriched and enriched simulated milk samples were used to evaluate the limits of detection (LOD) of these methods. Using high‐resolution melting (HRM) was used to explore the sensitivity of the dual EvaGreen‐RAA assay.The sensitivity of the fluorescent RAA method for detecting SA and LM was 10 copies/μL using plasmids and the sensitivity of the SAMRS‐RAA and EvaGreen‐RAA for detecting SA and LM plasmids was 1 copies/μL. The LOD values of the EvaGreen‐RAA for SA and LM in unenriched simulated milk samples were 100 and 50 CFU/mL, respectively, and the LOD value for both SA and LM using enriched simulated milk samples was 10 CFU/mL. EvaGreen‐RAA had linear amplification in real time in the range of 1–105 copies/μL of the plasmids of SA and LM. The sensitivity of the dual EvaGreen‐RAA assay for SA and LM was estimated to be 102 CFU/mL.A real‐time quantitative EvaGreen‐RAA method for detecting SA and LM was developed, which eliminates the need to design complex RAA probes. This dye‐based RAA with SARMS primers provides a new strategy for simplifying fluorescence probe RAA and allowing the detection of multiple pathogens, which has many potential applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iLABMED\",\"volume\":\"55 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iLABMED\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ila2.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLABMED","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ila2.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

荧光重组酶辅助扩增(RAA)检测法越来越多地用于各种病原体的检测,与实时 PCR(qPCR)检测法相比,它具有快速、简便、灵敏度和特异性相似等优点,但需要复杂的探针设计。为了避免在 RAA 中添加荧光探针,研究人员开发了一种基于 EvaGreen 染料的重组酶辅助扩增(EvaGreen-RAA)检测方法,该方法使用自避开分子识别系统(SAMRS)引物,有效避免了引物二聚体的产生,从而提高了检测灵敏度,同时使用 EvaGreen 染料对扩增产物进行实时定量检测。以金黄色葡萄球菌(SA)和单核细胞增生李斯特菌(LM)为例,开发了使用 SAMRS 引物的 EvaGreen-RAA。作为参考和比较,还研究了传统的荧光探针 RAA 方法和带有 SAMRS 引物的 RAA 方法(SAMRS-RAA)来检测 SA 和 LM。使用重组质粒的系列稀释液来评估检测方法的灵敏度。使用未富集和富集的模拟牛奶样本来评估这些方法的检测限(LOD)。使用质粒检测 SA 和 LM 的荧光 RAA 方法的灵敏度为 10 拷贝/μL,而 SAMRS-RAA 和 EvaGreen-RAA 检测 SA 和 LM 质粒的灵敏度为 1 拷贝/μL。EvaGreen-RAA 在未富集的模拟奶样品中检测 SA 和 LM 的 LOD 值分别为 100 和 50 CFU/mL,在富集的模拟奶样品中检测 SA 和 LM 的 LOD 值均为 10 CFU/mL。EvaGreen-RAA 对 SA 和 LM 质粒的实时线性扩增范围为 1-105 拷贝/μL。该方法无需设计复杂的 RAA 探针。这种基于染料的 RAA 搭配 SARMS 引物,为简化荧光探针 RAA 提供了一种新策略,可用于检测多种病原体,具有许多潜在的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dye‐based recombinase‐aided amplification assay with enhanced sensitivity and specificity
Fluorescent recombinase‐aided amplification (RAA) assays are increasingly being used in the detection of a variety of pathogens and have the advantages of rapidity and simplicity and similar sensitivity and specificity, compared with real‐time PCR (qPCR) assays, but they require a complex probe design. To eliminate the addition of fluorescent probes for RAA, an EvaGreen dye‐based recombinase‐aided amplification (EvaGreen‐RAA) assay using self‐avoiding molecular recognition system (SAMRS) primers was developed.The SAMRS primers effectively avoided the production of primer dimers, thus improving the detection sensitivity, while EvaGreen dye was used to quantitatively measure the amplified products in real time. Using Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Listeria monocytogenes (LM) as examples, EvaGreen‐RAA with SAMRS primers was developed. As a reference and comparison, a traditional fluorescence probe RAA method and a RAA with SAMRS primers (SAMRS‐RAA) for detecting SA and LM were also investigated. Serial dilutions of recombinant plasmids were used to evaluate the sensitivity of the assays. Unenriched and enriched simulated milk samples were used to evaluate the limits of detection (LOD) of these methods. Using high‐resolution melting (HRM) was used to explore the sensitivity of the dual EvaGreen‐RAA assay.The sensitivity of the fluorescent RAA method for detecting SA and LM was 10 copies/μL using plasmids and the sensitivity of the SAMRS‐RAA and EvaGreen‐RAA for detecting SA and LM plasmids was 1 copies/μL. The LOD values of the EvaGreen‐RAA for SA and LM in unenriched simulated milk samples were 100 and 50 CFU/mL, respectively, and the LOD value for both SA and LM using enriched simulated milk samples was 10 CFU/mL. EvaGreen‐RAA had linear amplification in real time in the range of 1–105 copies/μL of the plasmids of SA and LM. The sensitivity of the dual EvaGreen‐RAA assay for SA and LM was estimated to be 102 CFU/mL.A real‐time quantitative EvaGreen‐RAA method for detecting SA and LM was developed, which eliminates the need to design complex RAA probes. This dye‐based RAA with SARMS primers provides a new strategy for simplifying fluorescence probe RAA and allowing the detection of multiple pathogens, which has many potential applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信