企业资源规划(ERP)系统实施后评估:内部审计师的视角

Xenia J. Mamakou, Sandra Cohen, Dimitris Manolopoulos
{"title":"企业资源规划(ERP)系统实施后评估:内部审计师的视角","authors":"Xenia J. Mamakou, Sandra Cohen, Dimitris Manolopoulos","doi":"10.1108/jsit-11-2023-0264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nEnterprise resource planning systems (ERPs) have provided new challenges in the management of organizations’ internal and external risks, and their adoption has triggered groundbreaking changes to internal audit practices. This study aims to shed light on the use of ERPs in internal auditing by identifying interrelations between postevaluations of the ERPs’ quality dimensions with internal auditors’ satisfaction, intentions to continue using such systems and perceived benefits.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nDrawing on a unique data set of internal auditors’ responses on a structured questionnaire, and by using the DeLone and McLean’s (2003) Information Systems success model as the conceptual framework, this study tests the research propositions by using partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings report statistically significant positive relationships among all three ERPs’ quality dimensions (system, information and service quality) with internal auditors’ satisfaction and intention to continue using these systems. Moreover, the study found that the benefits perceived by internal auditors were significantly influenced by their satisfaction with the system and their intention to continue using it.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe authors survey ERP postevaluation success factors in two unique contexts: internal auditors and Greece. Thus, the authors ground on previous research findings in diverse professional groups and national environments. In parallel, this study lends conceptual clarity and empirical evidence to a small but growing number of studies examining the implications of individuals’ perceptions, intentions and behavioral reactions in the context of ERP implementation.\n","PeriodicalId":510285,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Information Technology","volume":"22 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-implementation evaluation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems: an internal auditors’ perspective\",\"authors\":\"Xenia J. Mamakou, Sandra Cohen, Dimitris Manolopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jsit-11-2023-0264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nEnterprise resource planning systems (ERPs) have provided new challenges in the management of organizations’ internal and external risks, and their adoption has triggered groundbreaking changes to internal audit practices. This study aims to shed light on the use of ERPs in internal auditing by identifying interrelations between postevaluations of the ERPs’ quality dimensions with internal auditors’ satisfaction, intentions to continue using such systems and perceived benefits.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nDrawing on a unique data set of internal auditors’ responses on a structured questionnaire, and by using the DeLone and McLean’s (2003) Information Systems success model as the conceptual framework, this study tests the research propositions by using partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings report statistically significant positive relationships among all three ERPs’ quality dimensions (system, information and service quality) with internal auditors’ satisfaction and intention to continue using these systems. Moreover, the study found that the benefits perceived by internal auditors were significantly influenced by their satisfaction with the system and their intention to continue using it.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe authors survey ERP postevaluation success factors in two unique contexts: internal auditors and Greece. Thus, the authors ground on previous research findings in diverse professional groups and national environments. In parallel, this study lends conceptual clarity and empirical evidence to a small but growing number of studies examining the implications of individuals’ perceptions, intentions and behavioral reactions in the context of ERP implementation.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":510285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Information Technology\",\"volume\":\"22 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Information Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsit-11-2023-0264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsit-11-2023-0264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 企业资源规划系统(ERP)为组织的内部和外部风险管理带来了新的挑战,其采用引发了内部审计实践的突破性变化。本研究旨在通过确定对企业资源规划系统质量维度的事后评价与内部审计师的满意度、继续使用此类系统的意向以及感知到的益处之间的相互关系,来揭示企业资源规划系统在内部审计中的使用情况。设计/方法/途径本研究以内部审计师对结构化问卷的答复这一独特的数据集为基础,以 DeLone 和 McLean(2003 年)的信息系统成功模型为概念框架,采用偏最小二乘法结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)对研究命题进行了检验。研究结果研究结果表明,ERP 的所有三个质量维度(系统、信息和服务质量)与内部审计师的满意度和继续使用这些系统的意向之间存在统计意义上的显著正相关关系。此外,研究还发现,内部审计师感知到的好处对他们对系统的满意度和继续使用系统的意愿有重大影响。因此,作者以先前在不同专业群体和国家环境中的研究成果为基础。与此同时,这项研究为少数但日益增多的研究提供了清晰的概念和经验证据,这些研究探讨了ERP实施过程中个人认知、意图和行为反应的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-implementation evaluation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems: an internal auditors’ perspective
Purpose Enterprise resource planning systems (ERPs) have provided new challenges in the management of organizations’ internal and external risks, and their adoption has triggered groundbreaking changes to internal audit practices. This study aims to shed light on the use of ERPs in internal auditing by identifying interrelations between postevaluations of the ERPs’ quality dimensions with internal auditors’ satisfaction, intentions to continue using such systems and perceived benefits. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on a unique data set of internal auditors’ responses on a structured questionnaire, and by using the DeLone and McLean’s (2003) Information Systems success model as the conceptual framework, this study tests the research propositions by using partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Findings The findings report statistically significant positive relationships among all three ERPs’ quality dimensions (system, information and service quality) with internal auditors’ satisfaction and intention to continue using these systems. Moreover, the study found that the benefits perceived by internal auditors were significantly influenced by their satisfaction with the system and their intention to continue using it. Originality/value The authors survey ERP postevaluation success factors in two unique contexts: internal auditors and Greece. Thus, the authors ground on previous research findings in diverse professional groups and national environments. In parallel, this study lends conceptual clarity and empirical evidence to a small but growing number of studies examining the implications of individuals’ perceptions, intentions and behavioral reactions in the context of ERP implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信