肱骨近端骨折经皮基尔希纳钢丝固定与哲氏钢板固定的功能效果比较研究

Akshay Bhosale, Mayur Agrawal, Tushar Pimpale
{"title":"肱骨近端骨折经皮基尔希纳钢丝固定与哲氏钢板固定的功能效果比较研究","authors":"Akshay Bhosale, Mayur Agrawal, Tushar Pimpale","doi":"10.18231/j.ijor.2024.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Proximal humerus fractures, accounting for approximately 5% of all fractures, pose a significant challenge in orthopedic management due to their complex anatomy and diverse fracture patterns. Treatment options range from conservative methods to various surgical interventions, each with its pros and cons. This study specifically compares two commonly employed surgical techniques: Open reduction & internal fixation with PHILOS plate and percutaneous k-wire fixation with/without external clamps. This study aims to address the effectiveness of each technique by evaluating functional outcomes using validated scoring systems like the Constant-Murley Score. To assess the functional outcomes of two surgical treatment methods (K-wire application and PHILOS plate fixation) for proximal humerus fractures. : A randomized prospective study was conducted on patients coming to the Orthopaedics outpatient department or casualty of tertiary care hospital for a duration of 1 year from Dec 2022 to Nov 2023. A total of 18 patients were included in the study. The mean Constant- Murley Score (CMS) was 81 +/- 6.13 for the PHILOS plating group and 76.88 +/- 7.37 for the K-wire treated group with a p-value of 0.08. The results for CMS were excellent in 22.2% of patients and good in 66.7% of patients in PHILOS treated group and excellent for 11.11%, good for 66.67% and satisfactory for 22.2% in the K-wire treated group. Both groups achieved satisfactory functional outcomes with CM Score at the final follow-up. Both techniques achieved favorable outcomes, with a majority of patients in both groups (88.89% for PHILOS and 77.78% for K-wire) achieving good to excellent results based on the CMS scores.","PeriodicalId":483250,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of functional outcome of percutaneous kirschner wire fixation versus philos plating of proximal humerus fractures\",\"authors\":\"Akshay Bhosale, Mayur Agrawal, Tushar Pimpale\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijor.2024.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Proximal humerus fractures, accounting for approximately 5% of all fractures, pose a significant challenge in orthopedic management due to their complex anatomy and diverse fracture patterns. Treatment options range from conservative methods to various surgical interventions, each with its pros and cons. This study specifically compares two commonly employed surgical techniques: Open reduction & internal fixation with PHILOS plate and percutaneous k-wire fixation with/without external clamps. This study aims to address the effectiveness of each technique by evaluating functional outcomes using validated scoring systems like the Constant-Murley Score. To assess the functional outcomes of two surgical treatment methods (K-wire application and PHILOS plate fixation) for proximal humerus fractures. : A randomized prospective study was conducted on patients coming to the Orthopaedics outpatient department or casualty of tertiary care hospital for a duration of 1 year from Dec 2022 to Nov 2023. A total of 18 patients were included in the study. The mean Constant- Murley Score (CMS) was 81 +/- 6.13 for the PHILOS plating group and 76.88 +/- 7.37 for the K-wire treated group with a p-value of 0.08. The results for CMS were excellent in 22.2% of patients and good in 66.7% of patients in PHILOS treated group and excellent for 11.11%, good for 66.67% and satisfactory for 22.2% in the K-wire treated group. Both groups achieved satisfactory functional outcomes with CM Score at the final follow-up. Both techniques achieved favorable outcomes, with a majority of patients in both groups (88.89% for PHILOS and 77.78% for K-wire) achieving good to excellent results based on the CMS scores.\",\"PeriodicalId\":483250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijor.2024.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijor.2024.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:肱骨近端骨折约占所有骨折的 5%,由于其复杂的解剖结构和多样的骨折形态,给骨科治疗带来了巨大挑战。治疗方法从保守方法到各种手术干预,各有利弊。本研究特别比较了两种常用的手术技术:使用 PHILOS 钢板的开放复位内固定术和带/不带外夹的经皮 k 线固定术。本研究旨在通过使用有效的评分系统(如 Constant-Murley 评分)评估功能结果,来探讨每种技术的有效性。评估肱骨近端骨折的两种手术治疗方法(K线应用和PHILOS钢板固定)的功能效果。 研究对象为前来三级医院骨科门诊部或急诊室就诊的患者,时间为2022年12月至2023年11月,为期1年。研究共纳入 18 名患者。PHILOS钢板组的平均康斯坦茨-穆雷评分(CMS)为81 +/- 6.13,K线治疗组为76.88 +/- 7.37,P值为0.08。在 PHILOS 治疗组中,22.2% 的患者的 CMS 结果为优秀,66.7% 的患者的 CMS 结果为良好;在 K 线治疗组中,11.11% 的患者的 CMS 结果为优秀,66.67% 的患者的 CMS 结果为良好,22.2% 的患者的 CMS 结果为满意。两组患者在最终随访时均获得了令人满意的 CM 评分功能结果。两种技术都取得了良好的疗效,根据CMS评分,两组的大多数患者(PHILOS治疗组88.89%,K线治疗组77.78%)都取得了良好到优秀的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of functional outcome of percutaneous kirschner wire fixation versus philos plating of proximal humerus fractures
: Proximal humerus fractures, accounting for approximately 5% of all fractures, pose a significant challenge in orthopedic management due to their complex anatomy and diverse fracture patterns. Treatment options range from conservative methods to various surgical interventions, each with its pros and cons. This study specifically compares two commonly employed surgical techniques: Open reduction & internal fixation with PHILOS plate and percutaneous k-wire fixation with/without external clamps. This study aims to address the effectiveness of each technique by evaluating functional outcomes using validated scoring systems like the Constant-Murley Score. To assess the functional outcomes of two surgical treatment methods (K-wire application and PHILOS plate fixation) for proximal humerus fractures. : A randomized prospective study was conducted on patients coming to the Orthopaedics outpatient department or casualty of tertiary care hospital for a duration of 1 year from Dec 2022 to Nov 2023. A total of 18 patients were included in the study. The mean Constant- Murley Score (CMS) was 81 +/- 6.13 for the PHILOS plating group and 76.88 +/- 7.37 for the K-wire treated group with a p-value of 0.08. The results for CMS were excellent in 22.2% of patients and good in 66.7% of patients in PHILOS treated group and excellent for 11.11%, good for 66.67% and satisfactory for 22.2% in the K-wire treated group. Both groups achieved satisfactory functional outcomes with CM Score at the final follow-up. Both techniques achieved favorable outcomes, with a majority of patients in both groups (88.89% for PHILOS and 77.78% for K-wire) achieving good to excellent results based on the CMS scores.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信