利用两次地震的破坏数据绘制智利房屋的经验脆性曲线

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Tamara Cabrera, Matías A. Hube, Hernán Santa María, Vitor Silva, Luis Martins, Catalina Yepes-Estrada, Matías F. Chacón
{"title":"利用两次地震的破坏数据绘制智利房屋的经验脆性曲线","authors":"Tamara Cabrera,&nbsp;Matías A. Hube,&nbsp;Hernán Santa María,&nbsp;Vitor Silva,&nbsp;Luis Martins,&nbsp;Catalina Yepes-Estrada,&nbsp;Matías F. Chacón","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-01933-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Strong seismic events frequently strike Chile. The last three significant events that caused considerable damage and losses are the 2010 (<span>\\({M}_{w}\\)</span> 8.8, Maule), 2014 (<span>\\({M}_{w}\\)</span> 8.2, Iquique), and 2015 (<span>\\({M}_{w}\\)</span> 8.3, Illapel) earthquakes. Therefore, reliable fragility curves are necessary to evaluate the threat of earthquakes to the built environment. This study aims to develop empirical fragility curves of Chilean houses using damage from the 2014 and 2015 earthquakes. The data from 9085 and 7431 damaged houses from the 2014 and 2015 earthquakes, respectively, was obtained by the government. The fragility curves were estimated for reinforced concrete, reinforced masonry, timber, and adobe houses. Additionally, the fragility curves were constructed using three different Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) maps to quantify the variation of the fragility parameters based on the selected PGA map and to identify which PGA map generates the highest correlation with observed damage. Additionally, fragility curves obtained in this study are compared with curves from other studies. The median <span>\\(\\theta\\)</span> values of the fragility curves obtained in this study are larger than those from other reported studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"22 11","pages":"5619 - 5638"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical fragility curves for houses in Chile using damage data from two earthquakes\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Cabrera,&nbsp;Matías A. Hube,&nbsp;Hernán Santa María,&nbsp;Vitor Silva,&nbsp;Luis Martins,&nbsp;Catalina Yepes-Estrada,&nbsp;Matías F. Chacón\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-024-01933-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Strong seismic events frequently strike Chile. The last three significant events that caused considerable damage and losses are the 2010 (<span>\\\\({M}_{w}\\\\)</span> 8.8, Maule), 2014 (<span>\\\\({M}_{w}\\\\)</span> 8.2, Iquique), and 2015 (<span>\\\\({M}_{w}\\\\)</span> 8.3, Illapel) earthquakes. Therefore, reliable fragility curves are necessary to evaluate the threat of earthquakes to the built environment. This study aims to develop empirical fragility curves of Chilean houses using damage from the 2014 and 2015 earthquakes. The data from 9085 and 7431 damaged houses from the 2014 and 2015 earthquakes, respectively, was obtained by the government. The fragility curves were estimated for reinforced concrete, reinforced masonry, timber, and adobe houses. Additionally, the fragility curves were constructed using three different Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) maps to quantify the variation of the fragility parameters based on the selected PGA map and to identify which PGA map generates the highest correlation with observed damage. Additionally, fragility curves obtained in this study are compared with curves from other studies. The median <span>\\\\(\\\\theta\\\\)</span> values of the fragility curves obtained in this study are larger than those from other reported studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"22 11\",\"pages\":\"5619 - 5638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01933-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01933-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智利经常发生强烈地震。最近三次造成巨大破坏和损失的重大事件分别是2010年(8.8级,毛莱)、2014年(8.2级,伊基克)和2015年(8.3级,伊利亚佩尔)地震。因此,评估地震对建筑环境的威胁需要可靠的脆性曲线。本研究旨在利用 2014 年和 2015 年地震造成的破坏,开发智利房屋的经验脆性曲线。政府分别从 2014 年和 2015 年地震中受损的 9085 所和 7431 所房屋中获得了数据。对钢筋混凝土、钢筋砖石、木材和土坯房屋的脆性曲线进行了估算。此外,还使用三种不同的峰值地面加速度(PGA)地图构建了脆性曲线,以量化脆性参数在所选 PGA 地图基础上的变化,并确定哪种 PGA 地图与观测到的损坏相关性最高。此外,还将本研究获得的脆性曲线与其他研究的曲线进行了比较。本研究获得的脆性曲线的中值(\theta\ )大于其他报告的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Empirical fragility curves for houses in Chile using damage data from two earthquakes

Empirical fragility curves for houses in Chile using damage data from two earthquakes

Strong seismic events frequently strike Chile. The last three significant events that caused considerable damage and losses are the 2010 (\({M}_{w}\) 8.8, Maule), 2014 (\({M}_{w}\) 8.2, Iquique), and 2015 (\({M}_{w}\) 8.3, Illapel) earthquakes. Therefore, reliable fragility curves are necessary to evaluate the threat of earthquakes to the built environment. This study aims to develop empirical fragility curves of Chilean houses using damage from the 2014 and 2015 earthquakes. The data from 9085 and 7431 damaged houses from the 2014 and 2015 earthquakes, respectively, was obtained by the government. The fragility curves were estimated for reinforced concrete, reinforced masonry, timber, and adobe houses. Additionally, the fragility curves were constructed using three different Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) maps to quantify the variation of the fragility parameters based on the selected PGA map and to identify which PGA map generates the highest correlation with observed damage. Additionally, fragility curves obtained in this study are compared with curves from other studies. The median \(\theta\) values of the fragility curves obtained in this study are larger than those from other reported studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信