全球本科生的目标取向:3 X 2 模型站得住脚吗?

Q2 Social Sciences
Maren Greve, Aaron S. Richmond, T. Beziat, Otavaia N. Davis, Keegan L. Moore, Christopher A. Was
{"title":"全球本科生的目标取向:3 X 2 模型站得住脚吗?","authors":"Maren Greve, Aaron S. Richmond, T. Beziat, Otavaia N. Davis, Keegan L. Moore, Christopher A. Was","doi":"10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, a large-scale study of college students’ motivation orientations when they transitioned to online learning because of the global COVID-19 pandemic found that unlike prior studies, in the 3 x 2 goal orientation framework the standard for competence (self, other, task) was of greater importance than valence (approach, avoidant). Moreover, previous research found students’ different goal orientations related to how they responded to the shutdown academically from both volition and social perspectives. We investigated whether a three-factor model would replicate with unique undergraduate cross-cultural samples, and we wanted to examine how students with different goal orientations responded to the shutdown of their universities due to the pandemic. Students from a U.S. university and students from Oman completed a 44-item goal orientation survey, a demographic survey, and an 11-item survey to assess students’ experiences following the pandemic. Results indicate that students who set task-based goals were less likely to have negative experiences related to the social aspects of the pandemic and those students who had negative responses to the lack of social contact were also expected to have lower grades.","PeriodicalId":37122,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Educational Research","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undergraduate Goal Orientations Across the Globe: Does the 3 X 2 Model Hold Up?\",\"authors\":\"Maren Greve, Aaron S. Richmond, T. Beziat, Otavaia N. Davis, Keegan L. Moore, Christopher A. Was\",\"doi\":\"10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, a large-scale study of college students’ motivation orientations when they transitioned to online learning because of the global COVID-19 pandemic found that unlike prior studies, in the 3 x 2 goal orientation framework the standard for competence (self, other, task) was of greater importance than valence (approach, avoidant). Moreover, previous research found students’ different goal orientations related to how they responded to the shutdown academically from both volition and social perspectives. We investigated whether a three-factor model would replicate with unique undergraduate cross-cultural samples, and we wanted to examine how students with different goal orientations responded to the shutdown of their universities due to the pandemic. Students from a U.S. university and students from Oman completed a 44-item goal orientation survey, a demographic survey, and an 11-item survey to assess students’ experiences following the pandemic. Results indicate that students who set task-based goals were less likely to have negative experiences related to the social aspects of the pandemic and those students who had negative responses to the lack of social contact were also expected to have lower grades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,一项针对大学生因全球 COVID-19 大流行而过渡到在线学习时的动机取向的大规模研究发现,与之前的研究不同,在 3 x 2 目标取向框架中,能力标准(自我、他人、任务)比情绪标准(接近、回避)更重要。此外,以往的研究发现,学生的不同目标取向与他们如何从意志和社会角度对停课做出学术反应有关。我们研究了三因素模型是否会在独特的本科生跨文化样本中得到复制,我们希望研究具有不同目标取向的学生是如何对大学因大流行病而停课做出反应的。来自美国一所大学的学生和来自阿曼的学生完成了一项包含 44 个项目的目标定向调查、一项人口调查和一项包含 11 个项目的调查,以评估学生在大流行病发生后的经历。结果表明,设定任务型目标的学生不太可能有与大流行病的社会方面相关的负面经历,而那些对缺乏社会接触有负面反应的学生预计成绩也会较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Undergraduate Goal Orientations Across the Globe: Does the 3 X 2 Model Hold Up?
Recently, a large-scale study of college students’ motivation orientations when they transitioned to online learning because of the global COVID-19 pandemic found that unlike prior studies, in the 3 x 2 goal orientation framework the standard for competence (self, other, task) was of greater importance than valence (approach, avoidant). Moreover, previous research found students’ different goal orientations related to how they responded to the shutdown academically from both volition and social perspectives. We investigated whether a three-factor model would replicate with unique undergraduate cross-cultural samples, and we wanted to examine how students with different goal orientations responded to the shutdown of their universities due to the pandemic. Students from a U.S. university and students from Oman completed a 44-item goal orientation survey, a demographic survey, and an 11-item survey to assess students’ experiences following the pandemic. Results indicate that students who set task-based goals were less likely to have negative experiences related to the social aspects of the pandemic and those students who had negative responses to the lack of social contact were also expected to have lower grades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Educational Research
European Journal of Educational Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
184
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信