现代英国的和平主义与和平行动主义:和平研究问题 "的历史

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY
History Compass Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1111/hic3.12816
Fiona Reid
{"title":"现代英国的和平主义与和平行动主义:和平研究问题 \"的历史","authors":"Fiona Reid","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is over 40 years since Ceadel defined interwar British pacifism as a ‘faith’. During that time, pacifism has had little political significance and the influential peace movement of the interwar years is now scarcely within living memory. Yet, what Margaret Thatcher once described as ‘the peace studies problem’ is a diverse and interdisciplinary field, and one in which scholarship, peace activism and mainstream politics are all closely intertwined. Feminist scholars and peace activists have queried the links between militarism and patriarchy; historians and ethicists have explored medical pacifism and have asked whether medicine is (or should be) a pacifist profession. More recently, scholars have looked at interwar pacifism through the lens of the Empire and have challenged the imperialist pacifist delusion. Despite pacifism's limited political influence, its history over the last 40 years has explored the beliefs and motivations of men and women struggling to respond to militarism and the threat of war.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"22 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hic3.12816","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pacifism and peace activism in modern Britain: A history of the ‘peace studies problem’\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hic3.12816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>It is over 40 years since Ceadel defined interwar British pacifism as a ‘faith’. During that time, pacifism has had little political significance and the influential peace movement of the interwar years is now scarcely within living memory. Yet, what Margaret Thatcher once described as ‘the peace studies problem’ is a diverse and interdisciplinary field, and one in which scholarship, peace activism and mainstream politics are all closely intertwined. Feminist scholars and peace activists have queried the links between militarism and patriarchy; historians and ethicists have explored medical pacifism and have asked whether medicine is (or should be) a pacifist profession. More recently, scholars have looked at interwar pacifism through the lens of the Empire and have challenged the imperialist pacifist delusion. Despite pacifism's limited political influence, its history over the last 40 years has explored the beliefs and motivations of men and women struggling to respond to militarism and the threat of war.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History Compass\",\"volume\":\"22 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hic3.12816\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hic3.12816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hic3.12816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从 Ceadel 将战时英国的和平主义定义为一种 "信仰 "以来,已经过去 40 多年了。在此期间,和平主义的政治意义微乎其微,战时颇具影响力的和平运动如今也几乎不复存在于人们的记忆中。然而,撒切尔夫人曾经描述的 "和平研究问题 "是一个多元化和跨学科的领域,在这个领域中,学术研究、和平活动和主流政治都紧密地交织在一起。女权主义学者与和平活动家对军国主义与父权制之间的联系提出了质疑;历史学家和伦理学家探讨了医学和平主义,并提出医学是否是(或应该是)和平主义职业的问题。最近,学者们通过帝国的视角来审视战时的和平主义,并对帝国主义和平主义的错觉提出了质疑。尽管和平主义的政治影响力有限,但在过去 40 年中,和平主义的历史已经探索了那些努力应对军国主义和战争威胁的人们的信仰和动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pacifism and peace activism in modern Britain: A history of the ‘peace studies problem’

It is over 40 years since Ceadel defined interwar British pacifism as a ‘faith’. During that time, pacifism has had little political significance and the influential peace movement of the interwar years is now scarcely within living memory. Yet, what Margaret Thatcher once described as ‘the peace studies problem’ is a diverse and interdisciplinary field, and one in which scholarship, peace activism and mainstream politics are all closely intertwined. Feminist scholars and peace activists have queried the links between militarism and patriarchy; historians and ethicists have explored medical pacifism and have asked whether medicine is (or should be) a pacifist profession. More recently, scholars have looked at interwar pacifism through the lens of the Empire and have challenged the imperialist pacifist delusion. Despite pacifism's limited political influence, its history over the last 40 years has explored the beliefs and motivations of men and women struggling to respond to militarism and the threat of war.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History Compass
History Compass HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信