皮下植入式心律转复除颤器患者的左心室辅助装置植入效果：病例系列

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100426

Alex J. Nusbickel, Stephen Allan Petty, Steven J. Ross, Alex Parker, Juan Vilaro, Mustafa M. Ahmed

{"title":"皮下植入式心律转复除颤器患者的左心室辅助装置植入效果：病例系列","authors":"Alex J. Nusbickel, Stephen Allan Petty, Steven J. Ross, Alex Parker, Juan Vilaro, Mustafa M. Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may induce electromagnetic interference (EMI) affecting implanted cardiac devices, including more novel subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillators (S-ICDs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this case series, the authors retrospectively reviewed courses of 6 patients with S-ICDs who underwent LVAD implantation at a single center.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 6 patients reviewed, 4 experienced inappropriate ICD shocks, of which 3 resulted from EMI. Five of the 6 patients ultimately had S-ICD therapies disabled.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Due to EMI resulting in inappropriate shocks and improved tolerability of malignant arrhythmias, deactivation or removal of S-ICDs should be considered in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000697/pdfft?md5=5ad351a98a56de6a9c4bc880919e2c18&pid=1-s2.0-S2666602224000697-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left ventricular assist device implantation outcomes in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A case series\",\"authors\":\"Alex J. Nusbickel, Stephen Allan Petty, Steven J. Ross, Alex Parker, Juan Vilaro, Mustafa M. Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may induce electromagnetic interference (EMI) affecting implanted cardiac devices, including more novel subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillators (S-ICDs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this case series, the authors retrospectively reviewed courses of 6 patients with S-ICDs who underwent LVAD implantation at a single center.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 6 patients reviewed, 4 experienced inappropriate ICD shocks, of which 3 resulted from EMI. Five of the 6 patients ultimately had S-ICD therapies disabled.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Due to EMI resulting in inappropriate shocks and improved tolerability of malignant arrhythmias, deactivation or removal of S-ICDs should be considered in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000697/pdfft?md5=5ad351a98a56de6a9c4bc880919e2c18&pid=1-s2.0-S2666602224000697-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景左心室辅助装置（LVAD）可能会诱发电磁干扰（EMI），影响植入式心脏装置，包括更新型的皮下植入式心脏除颤器（S-ICD）.方法在这一病例系列中，作者回顾性地回顾了在一个中心接受 LVAD 植入术的 6 名带有 S-ICD 的患者的病程.结果在回顾的 6 名患者中，4 人经历了不适当的 ICD 电击，其中 3 人是由 EMI 引起的.结论由于 EMI 导致不适当的电击和恶性心律失常耐受性的改善，停用或移除 S-ICD 可能会影响植入式心脏装置，包括更新型的皮下植入式心脏除颤器（S-ICD）.结论由于电磁干扰（EMI）会导致不适当的电击，而且恶性心律失常的耐受性有所提高，因此接受 LVAD 植入术的患者应考虑停用或移除 S-ICD。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Left ventricular assist device implantation outcomes in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A case series

Background

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may induce electromagnetic interference (EMI) affecting implanted cardiac devices, including more novel subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillators (S-ICDs).

Methods

In this case series, the authors retrospectively reviewed courses of 6 patients with S-ICDs who underwent LVAD implantation at a single center.

Results

Of the 6 patients reviewed, 4 experienced inappropriate ICD shocks, of which 3 resulted from EMI. Five of the 6 patients ultimately had S-ICD therapies disabled.

Conclusions

Due to EMI resulting in inappropriate shocks and improved tolerability of malignant arrhythmias, deactivation or removal of S-ICDs should be considered in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

59 days