大流行病时期的四年紧急许可:马萨诸塞州紧急许可教师的留任和有效性随时间的推移

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Ben Backes , James Cowan , Dan Goldhaber , Roddy Theobald
{"title":"大流行病时期的四年紧急许可:马萨诸塞州紧急许可教师的留任和有效性随时间的推移","authors":"Ben Backes ,&nbsp;James Cowan ,&nbsp;Dan Goldhaber ,&nbsp;Roddy Theobald","doi":"10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most states responded to the onset of the pandemic by granting temporary licenses that allowed teachers to work in classrooms without first passing the typical licensure exams. In this paper, we examine the result of this policy in Massachusetts using data on multiple cohorts of emergency licensed teachers (ELTs). We find that ELTs were slightly more likely to be retained in the same school than teachers from other entry routes. However, ELTs’ students scored significantly lower on standardized tests in math and science than other students in the same school and same year. Our findings are at odds with earlier, more positive assessments of emergency licensure. Our updated results appear to be driven by more recent cohorts of ELTs. Overall, this study suggests policymakers should be cautious when drawing sweeping conclusions about the impacts of teacher licensure based solely on the earliest cohort of teachers who obtained pandemic-era licenses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48261,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Education Review","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102562"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Four years of pandemic-era emergency licenses: retention and effectiveness of emergency-licensed Massachusetts teachers over time\",\"authors\":\"Ben Backes ,&nbsp;James Cowan ,&nbsp;Dan Goldhaber ,&nbsp;Roddy Theobald\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Most states responded to the onset of the pandemic by granting temporary licenses that allowed teachers to work in classrooms without first passing the typical licensure exams. In this paper, we examine the result of this policy in Massachusetts using data on multiple cohorts of emergency licensed teachers (ELTs). We find that ELTs were slightly more likely to be retained in the same school than teachers from other entry routes. However, ELTs’ students scored significantly lower on standardized tests in math and science than other students in the same school and same year. Our findings are at odds with earlier, more positive assessments of emergency licensure. Our updated results appear to be driven by more recent cohorts of ELTs. Overall, this study suggests policymakers should be cautious when drawing sweeping conclusions about the impacts of teacher licensure based solely on the earliest cohort of teachers who obtained pandemic-era licenses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Education Review\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775724000566\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775724000566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数州在大流行病爆发时都颁发了临时执照,允许教师在没有通过一般执照考试的情况下在教室工作。在本文中,我们利用多批紧急持证教师(ELTs)的数据,研究了马萨诸塞州这一政策的结果。我们发现,与其他入职途径的教师相比,应急持证教师留在同一所学校的可能性略高。然而,在同一所学校和同一年,应急持证教师的学生在数学和科学标准测试中的得分明显低于其他学生。我们的研究结果与早先对应急执照的积极评价不符。我们更新的结果似乎是由较新的一批英语语言教师驱动的。总之,这项研究表明,政策制定者在仅根据最早一批获得大流行病时期教师执照的教师对教师执照的影响得出一概而论的结论时,应持谨慎态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Four years of pandemic-era emergency licenses: retention and effectiveness of emergency-licensed Massachusetts teachers over time

Most states responded to the onset of the pandemic by granting temporary licenses that allowed teachers to work in classrooms without first passing the typical licensure exams. In this paper, we examine the result of this policy in Massachusetts using data on multiple cohorts of emergency licensed teachers (ELTs). We find that ELTs were slightly more likely to be retained in the same school than teachers from other entry routes. However, ELTs’ students scored significantly lower on standardized tests in math and science than other students in the same school and same year. Our findings are at odds with earlier, more positive assessments of emergency licensure. Our updated results appear to be driven by more recent cohorts of ELTs. Overall, this study suggests policymakers should be cautious when drawing sweeping conclusions about the impacts of teacher licensure based solely on the earliest cohort of teachers who obtained pandemic-era licenses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
85
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Economics of Education Review publishes research on education policy and finance, human capital production and acquisition, and the returns to human capital. We accept empirical, methodological and theoretical contributions, but the main focus of Economics of Education Review is on applied studies that employ micro data and clear identification strategies. Our goal is to publish innovative, cutting-edge research on the economics of education that is of interest to academics, policymakers and the public. Starting with papers submitted March 1, 2014, the review process for articles submitted to the Economics of Education Review will no longer be double blind. Authors are requested to include a title page with authors'' names and affiliation. Reviewers will continue to be anonymous.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信