用于堆肥生产的人工湿地生物质:评估对作物和土壤的影响

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Francesco Chioggia, Marco Grigatti, Stevo Lavrnić, Attilio Toscano
{"title":"用于堆肥生产的人工湿地生物质:评估对作物和土壤的影响","authors":"Francesco Chioggia,&nbsp;Marco Grigatti,&nbsp;Stevo Lavrnić,&nbsp;Attilio Toscano","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the suitability of <em>Phragmites australis</em> (reed) biomass deriving from a surface flow constructed wetland (CW) to produce three compost types: reed (<strong>RC</strong>), reed mixed + potato cuttings (<strong>PC</strong>) and reed + liquid anaerobic digestate (<strong>DC</strong>), to promote both resource circularity and soil carbon sequestration. The composts were tested over 60 days on lettuce at two levels in combination or not with NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> (at the same kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> loading), along with NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> reference (<strong>Chem</strong>) and an unamended control (<strong>Ctrl</strong>). The plant tissue dry weight and N load was determined, and the N relative efficiency (N-RAE %) was calculated. On pot soil, total and labile carbon (TOC, C<sub>L</sub>), along with the carbon management index (CMI) and δ<sup>13</sup>C were evaluated. Pot test showed that <strong>PC</strong><sub>100</sub> yielded the best (g pot<sup>−1</sup>) lettuce biomass (3.0) &gt; <strong>DC</strong><sub><strong>100</strong></sub> and <strong>RC</strong><sub><strong>100</strong></sub> (2.5 and 1.6) ≈ chemical reference (3.8). A similar pattern was detected at 50% (g pot<sup>−1</sup>): <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (2.9) &gt; <strong>DC</strong><sub><strong>50</strong></sub> (2.7) &gt; <strong>RC</strong><sub><strong>50</strong></sub> (2.4). N-RAE (%) reflected this pattern: <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (60) &gt; <strong><em>DC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (21) &gt; <strong><em>RC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (10) and <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (76) &gt; <strong><em>DC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (53) &gt; <strong><em>RC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (52). Pot soil analyses showed composts well performed in TOC and CMI, in comparison to Ctrl (+42% and +13%), suggesting a positive impact on soil C amelioration. No significant differences were observed for δ<sup>13</sup>C distribution, suggesting the composts did not influence the microbic metabolism differently. These results indicated that the biomass harvested from the <strong>CW</strong>s can represent an interesting material for composting, combining carbon sequestration and nutrients recycling potential of these system, in addition to their wastewater treatment capacity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 107339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001642/pdfft?md5=e771e0d8000d62b05739394881b49d0e&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424001642-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructed wetland biomass for compost production: Evaluation of effects on crops and soil\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Chioggia,&nbsp;Marco Grigatti,&nbsp;Stevo Lavrnić,&nbsp;Attilio Toscano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the suitability of <em>Phragmites australis</em> (reed) biomass deriving from a surface flow constructed wetland (CW) to produce three compost types: reed (<strong>RC</strong>), reed mixed + potato cuttings (<strong>PC</strong>) and reed + liquid anaerobic digestate (<strong>DC</strong>), to promote both resource circularity and soil carbon sequestration. The composts were tested over 60 days on lettuce at two levels in combination or not with NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> (at the same kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> loading), along with NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> reference (<strong>Chem</strong>) and an unamended control (<strong>Ctrl</strong>). The plant tissue dry weight and N load was determined, and the N relative efficiency (N-RAE %) was calculated. On pot soil, total and labile carbon (TOC, C<sub>L</sub>), along with the carbon management index (CMI) and δ<sup>13</sup>C were evaluated. Pot test showed that <strong>PC</strong><sub>100</sub> yielded the best (g pot<sup>−1</sup>) lettuce biomass (3.0) &gt; <strong>DC</strong><sub><strong>100</strong></sub> and <strong>RC</strong><sub><strong>100</strong></sub> (2.5 and 1.6) ≈ chemical reference (3.8). A similar pattern was detected at 50% (g pot<sup>−1</sup>): <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (2.9) &gt; <strong>DC</strong><sub><strong>50</strong></sub> (2.7) &gt; <strong>RC</strong><sub><strong>50</strong></sub> (2.4). N-RAE (%) reflected this pattern: <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (60) &gt; <strong><em>DC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (21) &gt; <strong><em>RC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (10) and <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (76) &gt; <strong><em>DC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (53) &gt; <strong><em>RC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (52). Pot soil analyses showed composts well performed in TOC and CMI, in comparison to Ctrl (+42% and +13%), suggesting a positive impact on soil C amelioration. No significant differences were observed for δ<sup>13</sup>C distribution, suggesting the composts did not influence the microbic metabolism differently. These results indicated that the biomass harvested from the <strong>CW</strong>s can represent an interesting material for composting, combining carbon sequestration and nutrients recycling potential of these system, in addition to their wastewater treatment capacity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"207 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001642/pdfft?md5=e771e0d8000d62b05739394881b49d0e&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424001642-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001642\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001642","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了芦苇(Phragmites australis)生物质从地表流建造的湿地(CW)生产三种堆肥类型的适宜性:芦苇(RC)、芦苇混合+马铃薯剪枝(PC)和芦苇+液态厌氧沼渣(DC),以促进资源循环和土壤固碳。这些堆肥在莴苣上进行了为期 60 天的试验,试验分为两种水平,一种是与 NH4NO3 混合或不与 NH4NO3 混合(氮负荷为每公顷千克),另一种是 NH4NO3 参照物(Chem)和未经改良的对照(Ctrl)。测定植物组织干重和氮负荷,并计算氮相对效率(N-RAE %)。在盆栽土壤中,对总碳和易变碳(TOC、CL)以及碳管理指数(CMI)和δ13C进行了评估。盆栽试验表明,PC100 的生菜生物量(克盆-1)(3.0)与 DC100 和 RC100 的(2.5 和 1.6)≈ 化学参考值(3.8)相等。在 50%(克/盆-1)时也发现了类似的模式:PC50 (2.9) > DC50 (2.7) > RC50 (2.4)。N-RAE (%) 反映了这种模式:PC100 (60) > DC100 (21) > RC100 (10) 和 PC50 (76) > DC50 (53) > RC50 (52)。盆栽土壤分析表明,与 Ctrl 相比,堆肥在 TOC 和 CMI 方面表现出色(+42% 和 +13%),这表明堆肥对改善土壤 C 有积极影响。δ13C分布没有明显差异,表明堆肥对微生物代谢没有不同的影响。这些结果表明,从化武中收获的生物质可作为一种有趣的堆肥材料,将这些系统的固碳和养分循环潜力与废水处理能力结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constructed wetland biomass for compost production: Evaluation of effects on crops and soil

This study investigates the suitability of Phragmites australis (reed) biomass deriving from a surface flow constructed wetland (CW) to produce three compost types: reed (RC), reed mixed + potato cuttings (PC) and reed + liquid anaerobic digestate (DC), to promote both resource circularity and soil carbon sequestration. The composts were tested over 60 days on lettuce at two levels in combination or not with NH4NO3 (at the same kg N ha−1 loading), along with NH4NO3 reference (Chem) and an unamended control (Ctrl). The plant tissue dry weight and N load was determined, and the N relative efficiency (N-RAE %) was calculated. On pot soil, total and labile carbon (TOC, CL), along with the carbon management index (CMI) and δ13C were evaluated. Pot test showed that PC100 yielded the best (g pot−1) lettuce biomass (3.0) > DC100 and RC100 (2.5 and 1.6) ≈ chemical reference (3.8). A similar pattern was detected at 50% (g pot−1): PC50 (2.9) > DC50 (2.7) > RC50 (2.4). N-RAE (%) reflected this pattern: PC100 (60) > DC100 (21) > RC100 (10) and PC50 (76) > DC50 (53) > RC50 (52). Pot soil analyses showed composts well performed in TOC and CMI, in comparison to Ctrl (+42% and +13%), suggesting a positive impact on soil C amelioration. No significant differences were observed for δ13C distribution, suggesting the composts did not influence the microbic metabolism differently. These results indicated that the biomass harvested from the CWs can represent an interesting material for composting, combining carbon sequestration and nutrients recycling potential of these system, in addition to their wastewater treatment capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信