Francesco Chioggia, Marco Grigatti, Stevo Lavrnić, Attilio Toscano
{"title":"用于堆肥生产的人工湿地生物质:评估对作物和土壤的影响","authors":"Francesco Chioggia, Marco Grigatti, Stevo Lavrnić, Attilio Toscano","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the suitability of <em>Phragmites australis</em> (reed) biomass deriving from a surface flow constructed wetland (CW) to produce three compost types: reed (<strong>RC</strong>), reed mixed + potato cuttings (<strong>PC</strong>) and reed + liquid anaerobic digestate (<strong>DC</strong>), to promote both resource circularity and soil carbon sequestration. The composts were tested over 60 days on lettuce at two levels in combination or not with NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> (at the same kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> loading), along with NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> reference (<strong>Chem</strong>) and an unamended control (<strong>Ctrl</strong>). The plant tissue dry weight and N load was determined, and the N relative efficiency (N-RAE %) was calculated. On pot soil, total and labile carbon (TOC, C<sub>L</sub>), along with the carbon management index (CMI) and δ<sup>13</sup>C were evaluated. Pot test showed that <strong>PC</strong><sub>100</sub> yielded the best (g pot<sup>−1</sup>) lettuce biomass (3.0) > <strong>DC</strong><sub><strong>100</strong></sub> and <strong>RC</strong><sub><strong>100</strong></sub> (2.5 and 1.6) ≈ chemical reference (3.8). A similar pattern was detected at 50% (g pot<sup>−1</sup>): <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (2.9) > <strong>DC</strong><sub><strong>50</strong></sub> (2.7) > <strong>RC</strong><sub><strong>50</strong></sub> (2.4). N-RAE (%) reflected this pattern: <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (60) > <strong><em>DC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (21) > <strong><em>RC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (10) and <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (76) > <strong><em>DC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (53) > <strong><em>RC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (52). Pot soil analyses showed composts well performed in TOC and CMI, in comparison to Ctrl (+42% and +13%), suggesting a positive impact on soil C amelioration. No significant differences were observed for δ<sup>13</sup>C distribution, suggesting the composts did not influence the microbic metabolism differently. These results indicated that the biomass harvested from the <strong>CW</strong>s can represent an interesting material for composting, combining carbon sequestration and nutrients recycling potential of these system, in addition to their wastewater treatment capacity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 107339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001642/pdfft?md5=e771e0d8000d62b05739394881b49d0e&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424001642-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructed wetland biomass for compost production: Evaluation of effects on crops and soil\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Chioggia, Marco Grigatti, Stevo Lavrnić, Attilio Toscano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the suitability of <em>Phragmites australis</em> (reed) biomass deriving from a surface flow constructed wetland (CW) to produce three compost types: reed (<strong>RC</strong>), reed mixed + potato cuttings (<strong>PC</strong>) and reed + liquid anaerobic digestate (<strong>DC</strong>), to promote both resource circularity and soil carbon sequestration. The composts were tested over 60 days on lettuce at two levels in combination or not with NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> (at the same kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> loading), along with NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> reference (<strong>Chem</strong>) and an unamended control (<strong>Ctrl</strong>). The plant tissue dry weight and N load was determined, and the N relative efficiency (N-RAE %) was calculated. On pot soil, total and labile carbon (TOC, C<sub>L</sub>), along with the carbon management index (CMI) and δ<sup>13</sup>C were evaluated. Pot test showed that <strong>PC</strong><sub>100</sub> yielded the best (g pot<sup>−1</sup>) lettuce biomass (3.0) > <strong>DC</strong><sub><strong>100</strong></sub> and <strong>RC</strong><sub><strong>100</strong></sub> (2.5 and 1.6) ≈ chemical reference (3.8). A similar pattern was detected at 50% (g pot<sup>−1</sup>): <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (2.9) > <strong>DC</strong><sub><strong>50</strong></sub> (2.7) > <strong>RC</strong><sub><strong>50</strong></sub> (2.4). N-RAE (%) reflected this pattern: <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (60) > <strong><em>DC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (21) > <strong><em>RC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>100</em></strong></sub> (10) and <strong><em>PC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (76) > <strong><em>DC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (53) > <strong><em>RC</em></strong><sub><strong><em>50</em></strong></sub> (52). Pot soil analyses showed composts well performed in TOC and CMI, in comparison to Ctrl (+42% and +13%), suggesting a positive impact on soil C amelioration. No significant differences were observed for δ<sup>13</sup>C distribution, suggesting the composts did not influence the microbic metabolism differently. These results indicated that the biomass harvested from the <strong>CW</strong>s can represent an interesting material for composting, combining carbon sequestration and nutrients recycling potential of these system, in addition to their wastewater treatment capacity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"207 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001642/pdfft?md5=e771e0d8000d62b05739394881b49d0e&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424001642-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001642\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001642","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constructed wetland biomass for compost production: Evaluation of effects on crops and soil
This study investigates the suitability of Phragmites australis (reed) biomass deriving from a surface flow constructed wetland (CW) to produce three compost types: reed (RC), reed mixed + potato cuttings (PC) and reed + liquid anaerobic digestate (DC), to promote both resource circularity and soil carbon sequestration. The composts were tested over 60 days on lettuce at two levels in combination or not with NH4NO3 (at the same kg N ha−1 loading), along with NH4NO3 reference (Chem) and an unamended control (Ctrl). The plant tissue dry weight and N load was determined, and the N relative efficiency (N-RAE %) was calculated. On pot soil, total and labile carbon (TOC, CL), along with the carbon management index (CMI) and δ13C were evaluated. Pot test showed that PC100 yielded the best (g pot−1) lettuce biomass (3.0) > DC100 and RC100 (2.5 and 1.6) ≈ chemical reference (3.8). A similar pattern was detected at 50% (g pot−1): PC50 (2.9) > DC50 (2.7) > RC50 (2.4). N-RAE (%) reflected this pattern: PC100 (60) > DC100 (21) > RC100 (10) and PC50 (76) > DC50 (53) > RC50 (52). Pot soil analyses showed composts well performed in TOC and CMI, in comparison to Ctrl (+42% and +13%), suggesting a positive impact on soil C amelioration. No significant differences were observed for δ13C distribution, suggesting the composts did not influence the microbic metabolism differently. These results indicated that the biomass harvested from the CWs can represent an interesting material for composting, combining carbon sequestration and nutrients recycling potential of these system, in addition to their wastewater treatment capacity.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.