MacKenzie D Sidwell, Landon W Bonner, Kayla Bates-Brantley, Marsha Hasenoehrl, Daniel L Gadke
{"title":"美国心理学会认证的学校心理学课程强调单一案例设计。","authors":"MacKenzie D Sidwell, Landon W Bonner, Kayla Bates-Brantley, Marsha Hasenoehrl, Daniel L Gadke","doi":"10.1037/spq0000645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-case design (SCD) is an underutilized research methodology in school psychology literature. Despite its relevance to practitioners and applied intervention researchers alike, the majority of intervention research disseminated in school psychology journals tends to involve group designs, such as the randomized controlled trial. Group designs are useful for answering a wide variety of research questions but may not always be relevant to practitioners seeking procedures that work for their students or researchers seeking for the optimal design to answer their research questions. In comparison, the relative dearth of SCD studies in school psychology literature, in conjunction with common values among the field regarding data-based decision making and the scientist-practitioner model to training, raises questions about the cause of this gap. The present study sought to review doctoral training programs in school psychology and evaluate their relative emphasis on SCD in training. Seventy-six American Psychological Association-accredited school psychology programs were reviewed, and results indicated that roughly two thirds of programs do not emphasize SCD during training. Implications regarding school psychology training and research are discussed and recommendations are provided on future directions for school psychology trainers and researchers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74763,"journal":{"name":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"636-645"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-case design emphasis in American Psychological Association-accredited school psychology programs.\",\"authors\":\"MacKenzie D Sidwell, Landon W Bonner, Kayla Bates-Brantley, Marsha Hasenoehrl, Daniel L Gadke\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/spq0000645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Single-case design (SCD) is an underutilized research methodology in school psychology literature. Despite its relevance to practitioners and applied intervention researchers alike, the majority of intervention research disseminated in school psychology journals tends to involve group designs, such as the randomized controlled trial. Group designs are useful for answering a wide variety of research questions but may not always be relevant to practitioners seeking procedures that work for their students or researchers seeking for the optimal design to answer their research questions. In comparison, the relative dearth of SCD studies in school psychology literature, in conjunction with common values among the field regarding data-based decision making and the scientist-practitioner model to training, raises questions about the cause of this gap. The present study sought to review doctoral training programs in school psychology and evaluate their relative emphasis on SCD in training. Seventy-six American Psychological Association-accredited school psychology programs were reviewed, and results indicated that roughly two thirds of programs do not emphasize SCD during training. Implications regarding school psychology training and research are discussed and recommendations are provided on future directions for school psychology trainers and researchers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"636-645\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在学校心理学文献中,单案例设计(SCD)是一种未得到充分利用的研究方法。尽管单案例设计对从业人员和应用干预研究人员都很重要,但在学校心理学期刊上发表的大多数干预研究往往都是群体设计,如随机对照试验。分组设计对于回答各种各样的研究问题很有用,但对于寻求适合学生的程序的从业人员或寻求最佳设计来回答其研究问题的研究人员来说,可能并不总是适用的。相比之下,学校心理学文献中的 SCD 研究相对较少,再加上该领域关于基于数据的决策和科学家-实践者培训模式的共同价值观,让人不禁对造成这种差距的原因产生疑问。本研究试图回顾学校心理学博士培训项目,并评估其在培训中对 SCD 的相对重视程度。我们对 76 个经美国心理学会认证的学校心理学项目进行了审查,结果表明,大约三分之二的项目在培训过程中不强调 SCD。本文讨论了学校心理学培训和研究的意义,并就学校心理学培训师和研究人员的未来发展方向提出了建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
Single-case design emphasis in American Psychological Association-accredited school psychology programs.
Single-case design (SCD) is an underutilized research methodology in school psychology literature. Despite its relevance to practitioners and applied intervention researchers alike, the majority of intervention research disseminated in school psychology journals tends to involve group designs, such as the randomized controlled trial. Group designs are useful for answering a wide variety of research questions but may not always be relevant to practitioners seeking procedures that work for their students or researchers seeking for the optimal design to answer their research questions. In comparison, the relative dearth of SCD studies in school psychology literature, in conjunction with common values among the field regarding data-based decision making and the scientist-practitioner model to training, raises questions about the cause of this gap. The present study sought to review doctoral training programs in school psychology and evaluate their relative emphasis on SCD in training. Seventy-six American Psychological Association-accredited school psychology programs were reviewed, and results indicated that roughly two thirds of programs do not emphasize SCD during training. Implications regarding school psychology training and research are discussed and recommendations are provided on future directions for school psychology trainers and researchers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).