住院患者烧伤创面感染的病因结构和抗生素耐药性模式--保加利亚瓦尔纳的一项单中心研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
New Microbiologica Pub Date : 2024-07-01
Gergana Nedelcheva, Dajana Dobreva, Teofan Kuyumdzhiev, Gabriela Tsankova, Tatina Todorova
{"title":"住院患者烧伤创面感染的病因结构和抗生素耐药性模式--保加利亚瓦尔纳的一项单中心研究。","authors":"Gergana Nedelcheva, Dajana Dobreva, Teofan Kuyumdzhiev, Gabriela Tsankova, Tatina Todorova","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the present retrospective study, we have evaluated bacterial pathogens isolated from patients admitted to the Burn Care Unit at the Military Medical Academy, Varna, Bulgaria over a three-year period (January 2019 - December 2021). We also tried to summarize the corresponding antibiotic resistance pattern of the isolated infectious agents. A total of 1030 isolates were obtained from 1912 burn wound samples investigated. There were 553 Gram-positive (53.7%) and 477 Gram-negative (46.3%) isolates. The most common isolates for the study period were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (25%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.7%), Staphylococcus aureus (16.6%), Acinetobacter baumannii (7.7%), Enterobacter spp. (7.1%), Escherichia coli (4.4%), Proteus spp. (3.4%), and Klebsiella spp. (2.9%). Glycopeptide antibiotics and linezolid were the most effective drugs against gram-positive isolates, followed by amikacin (for synergistic combinations), whereas colistin, imipenem, meropenem, cefoperazon/sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam were the most active drugs against Gram-negative isolates, and colistin, ampicillin/sulbactam - against A. baumannii.</p>","PeriodicalId":54723,"journal":{"name":"New Microbiologica","volume":"47 2","pages":"146-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Etiological structure and antibiotic resistance pattern of burn wound infections in hospitalized patients - a one-center study in Varna, Bulgaria.\",\"authors\":\"Gergana Nedelcheva, Dajana Dobreva, Teofan Kuyumdzhiev, Gabriela Tsankova, Tatina Todorova\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the present retrospective study, we have evaluated bacterial pathogens isolated from patients admitted to the Burn Care Unit at the Military Medical Academy, Varna, Bulgaria over a three-year period (January 2019 - December 2021). We also tried to summarize the corresponding antibiotic resistance pattern of the isolated infectious agents. A total of 1030 isolates were obtained from 1912 burn wound samples investigated. There were 553 Gram-positive (53.7%) and 477 Gram-negative (46.3%) isolates. The most common isolates for the study period were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (25%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.7%), Staphylococcus aureus (16.6%), Acinetobacter baumannii (7.7%), Enterobacter spp. (7.1%), Escherichia coli (4.4%), Proteus spp. (3.4%), and Klebsiella spp. (2.9%). Glycopeptide antibiotics and linezolid were the most effective drugs against gram-positive isolates, followed by amikacin (for synergistic combinations), whereas colistin, imipenem, meropenem, cefoperazon/sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam were the most active drugs against Gram-negative isolates, and colistin, ampicillin/sulbactam - against A. baumannii.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Microbiologica\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"146-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Microbiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Microbiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本回顾性研究中,我们对三年内(2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月)从保加利亚瓦尔纳军事医学科学院烧伤护理部收治的患者中分离出的细菌病原体进行了评估。我们还试图总结分离出的感染病原体的相应抗生素耐药性模式。从调查的 1912 个烧伤创面样本中共分离出 1030 个病原体。其中革兰氏阳性菌 553 例(53.7%),革兰氏阴性菌 477 例(46.3%)。研究期间最常见的分离菌为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)(25%)、铜绿假单胞菌(17.7%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(16.6%)、鲍曼不动杆菌(7.7%)、肠杆菌属(7.1%)、大肠埃希菌(4.4%)、变形杆菌属(3.4%)和克雷伯菌属(2.9%)。糖肽类抗生素和利奈唑胺是对革兰氏阳性分离菌最有效的药物,其次是阿米卡星(协同组合),而秋水仙素、亚胺培南、美罗培南、头孢哌酮/舒巴坦和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦是对革兰氏阴性分离菌最有效的药物,秋水仙素、氨苄西林/舒巴坦是对鲍曼不动杆菌最有效的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Etiological structure and antibiotic resistance pattern of burn wound infections in hospitalized patients - a one-center study in Varna, Bulgaria.

In the present retrospective study, we have evaluated bacterial pathogens isolated from patients admitted to the Burn Care Unit at the Military Medical Academy, Varna, Bulgaria over a three-year period (January 2019 - December 2021). We also tried to summarize the corresponding antibiotic resistance pattern of the isolated infectious agents. A total of 1030 isolates were obtained from 1912 burn wound samples investigated. There were 553 Gram-positive (53.7%) and 477 Gram-negative (46.3%) isolates. The most common isolates for the study period were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (25%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.7%), Staphylococcus aureus (16.6%), Acinetobacter baumannii (7.7%), Enterobacter spp. (7.1%), Escherichia coli (4.4%), Proteus spp. (3.4%), and Klebsiella spp. (2.9%). Glycopeptide antibiotics and linezolid were the most effective drugs against gram-positive isolates, followed by amikacin (for synergistic combinations), whereas colistin, imipenem, meropenem, cefoperazon/sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam were the most active drugs against Gram-negative isolates, and colistin, ampicillin/sulbactam - against A. baumannii.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Microbiologica
New Microbiologica 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The publication, diffusion and furtherance of research and study on all aspects of basic and clinical Microbiology and related fields are the chief aims of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信