用于院前治疗 Covid-19 的抗病毒药物和中和单克隆抗体的安全性。

IF 14.3 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
{"title":"用于院前治疗 Covid-19 的抗病毒药物和中和单克隆抗体的安全性。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This proof-of-principle pharmacovigilance study used Electronic Health Record (EHR) data to examine the safety of sotrovimab, paxlovid and molnupiravir in prehospital treatment of Covid-19.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>With NHS England approval, we conducted an observational cohort study using OpenSAFELY-TPP, a secure software-platform which executes analyses across EHRs for 24 million people in England. High-risk individuals with Covid-19 eligible for prehospital treatment were included. Adverse events (AEs) were categorised into events in the drug’s Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), drug-reactions and immune-mediated. Cox models compared risk across treatments. A pre-pandemic record analysis was performed for comparative purposes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between 2021–2023, 37,449 patients received sotrovimab, paxlovid or molnupiravir whilst 109,647 patients made up an eligible-but-untreated population. The 28-day rates of AEs were low: SmPC 0.34 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI 0.32–0.36); drug-reactions 0.01 (95% CI 0.01–0.02) and immune-mediated 0.03 (95% CI 0.03–0.04), and similar or lower than the pre-pandemic period. Compared with the eligible but untreated population, sotrovimab and paxlovid associated with a risk of SmPC AE [adjHR 1.36 (95% CI 1.15–1.62) and 1.28 (95% CI 1.05–1.55), respectively], whilst sotrovimab associated with a risk of drug-reactions [adjHR 2.95 (95% CI 1.56–5.55)] and immune-mediated events [adjHR 3.22 (95% CI 1.86–5.57)].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Sotrovimab, paxlovid and molnupiravir demonstrate acceptable safety profiles. Although the risk of AEs was greatest with sotrovimab, event rates were lower than comparative pre-pandemic period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001610/pdfft?md5=5dc616dc8ed4c534e6d44c8ecc91c9d9&pid=1-s2.0-S0163445324001610-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The safety of antivirals and neutralising monoclonal antibodies used in prehospital treatment of Covid-19\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This proof-of-principle pharmacovigilance study used Electronic Health Record (EHR) data to examine the safety of sotrovimab, paxlovid and molnupiravir in prehospital treatment of Covid-19.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>With NHS England approval, we conducted an observational cohort study using OpenSAFELY-TPP, a secure software-platform which executes analyses across EHRs for 24 million people in England. High-risk individuals with Covid-19 eligible for prehospital treatment were included. Adverse events (AEs) were categorised into events in the drug’s Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), drug-reactions and immune-mediated. Cox models compared risk across treatments. A pre-pandemic record analysis was performed for comparative purposes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between 2021–2023, 37,449 patients received sotrovimab, paxlovid or molnupiravir whilst 109,647 patients made up an eligible-but-untreated population. The 28-day rates of AEs were low: SmPC 0.34 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI 0.32–0.36); drug-reactions 0.01 (95% CI 0.01–0.02) and immune-mediated 0.03 (95% CI 0.03–0.04), and similar or lower than the pre-pandemic period. Compared with the eligible but untreated population, sotrovimab and paxlovid associated with a risk of SmPC AE [adjHR 1.36 (95% CI 1.15–1.62) and 1.28 (95% CI 1.05–1.55), respectively], whilst sotrovimab associated with a risk of drug-reactions [adjHR 2.95 (95% CI 1.56–5.55)] and immune-mediated events [adjHR 3.22 (95% CI 1.86–5.57)].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Sotrovimab, paxlovid and molnupiravir demonstrate acceptable safety profiles. Although the risk of AEs was greatest with sotrovimab, event rates were lower than comparative pre-pandemic period.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001610/pdfft?md5=5dc616dc8ed4c534e6d44c8ecc91c9d9&pid=1-s2.0-S0163445324001610-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001610\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001610","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的这项原则性药物警戒研究使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据来检验索托维单抗、帕克洛维和莫仑吡韦在院前治疗Covid-19中的安全性:经英格兰国家医疗服务系统(NHS)批准,我们使用 OpenSAFELY-TPP 开展了一项观察性队列研究,这是一个安全的软件平台,可对英格兰 2400 万人的电子病历进行分析。研究对象包括符合院前治疗条件的 Covid-19 高危患者。不良事件(AEs)分为药物产品特征概要(SmPC)中的事件、药物反应和免疫介导的事件。Cox 模型比较了不同治疗方法的风险。为了进行比较,还对大流行前的记录进行了分析:2021-2023年间,37,449名患者接受了索曲单抗、帕克洛维或莫仑吡韦治疗,109,647名患者符合条件但未接受治疗。29天的AEs发生率较低:SmPC为每1000患者年0.34(95%CI为0.32-0.36);药物反应为0.01(95%CI为0.01-0.02),免疫介导为0.03(95%CI为0.03-0.04),与大流行前相似或更低。与符合条件但未接受治疗的人群相比,索托维单抗和帕克洛维与SmPC AE风险相关[adjHR分别为1.36(95%CI 1.15-1.62)和1.28(95%CI 1.05-1.55)],而索托维单抗与药物反应风险[adjHR 2.95(95%CI 1.56-5.55)]和免疫介导事件风险[adjHR 3.22(95%CI 1.86-5.57)]相关:索罗单抗、帕克洛维和莫仑匹拉韦均表现出可接受的安全性。结论:索曲单抗、帕克洛维和莫仑匹拉韦均表现出可接受的安全性。虽然索曲单抗的AE风险最大,但其事件发生率低于大流行前的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The safety of antivirals and neutralising monoclonal antibodies used in prehospital treatment of Covid-19

Objective

This proof-of-principle pharmacovigilance study used Electronic Health Record (EHR) data to examine the safety of sotrovimab, paxlovid and molnupiravir in prehospital treatment of Covid-19.

Method

With NHS England approval, we conducted an observational cohort study using OpenSAFELY-TPP, a secure software-platform which executes analyses across EHRs for 24 million people in England. High-risk individuals with Covid-19 eligible for prehospital treatment were included. Adverse events (AEs) were categorised into events in the drug’s Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), drug-reactions and immune-mediated. Cox models compared risk across treatments. A pre-pandemic record analysis was performed for comparative purposes.

Results

Between 2021–2023, 37,449 patients received sotrovimab, paxlovid or molnupiravir whilst 109,647 patients made up an eligible-but-untreated population. The 28-day rates of AEs were low: SmPC 0.34 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI 0.32–0.36); drug-reactions 0.01 (95% CI 0.01–0.02) and immune-mediated 0.03 (95% CI 0.03–0.04), and similar or lower than the pre-pandemic period. Compared with the eligible but untreated population, sotrovimab and paxlovid associated with a risk of SmPC AE [adjHR 1.36 (95% CI 1.15–1.62) and 1.28 (95% CI 1.05–1.55), respectively], whilst sotrovimab associated with a risk of drug-reactions [adjHR 2.95 (95% CI 1.56–5.55)] and immune-mediated events [adjHR 3.22 (95% CI 1.86–5.57)].

Conclusion

Sotrovimab, paxlovid and molnupiravir demonstrate acceptable safety profiles. Although the risk of AEs was greatest with sotrovimab, event rates were lower than comparative pre-pandemic period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection
Journal of Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
45.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
475
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection. Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信