可控踝关节运动靴的生物力学效果:系统综述和叙述性综述。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Mason L Stolycia, David E Lunn, Will Stanier, Josh Walker, Richard A Wilkins
{"title":"可控踝关节运动靴的生物力学效果:系统综述和叙述性综述。","authors":"Mason L Stolycia, David E Lunn, Will Stanier, Josh Walker, Richard A Wilkins","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.12044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controlled ankle motion (CAM) boots are a below-knee orthotic device prescribed for the management of foot and ankle injuries to reduce ankle range of motion (RoM) and offload the foot and ankle whilst allowing continued ambulation during recovery. There is a lack of clarity within the current literature surrounding the biomechanical understanding and effectiveness of CAM boots.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To summarise the biomechanical effects of CAM boot wear as an orthotic for restricting ankle RoM and offloading the foot.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. All papers were independently screened by two authors for inclusion. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal checklists. A narrative synthesis of all eligible papers was produced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies involving 197 participants (113 male and 84 female) were included. All studies were quasi-randomised and employed a within-study design, of which 12 studies included a control group and a range of CAM boots were investigated. CAM boots can be seen to restrict ankle RoM, however, neighboring joints such as the knee and hip do have kinetic and kinematic compensatory alterations. Plantar pressure of the forefoot is effectively redistributed to the hindfoot by CAM boots.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The compensatory mechanisms at the hip and knee joint during CAM boot wear could explain the secondary site pain often reported in patients, specifically at the ipsilateral knee and contralateral hip. Although CAM boots can be used to restrict ankle motion, this review has highlighted a lack of in-boot kinematic analyses during CAM boot use, where tracking markers are placed on the anatomical structure rather than on the boot, or through video fluoroscopy, urging the need for a more robust methodological approach to achieve this. There is a need for studies to assess the biomechanical alterations caused by CAM boots in populations living with foot and ankle pathologies. Future research, adopting a longitudinal study design, is required to fully understand the effectiveness of CAM boots for rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"17 3","pages":"e12044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical effectiveness of controlled ankle motion boots: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Mason L Stolycia, David E Lunn, Will Stanier, Josh Walker, Richard A Wilkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jfa2.12044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controlled ankle motion (CAM) boots are a below-knee orthotic device prescribed for the management of foot and ankle injuries to reduce ankle range of motion (RoM) and offload the foot and ankle whilst allowing continued ambulation during recovery. There is a lack of clarity within the current literature surrounding the biomechanical understanding and effectiveness of CAM boots.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To summarise the biomechanical effects of CAM boot wear as an orthotic for restricting ankle RoM and offloading the foot.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. All papers were independently screened by two authors for inclusion. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal checklists. A narrative synthesis of all eligible papers was produced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies involving 197 participants (113 male and 84 female) were included. All studies were quasi-randomised and employed a within-study design, of which 12 studies included a control group and a range of CAM boots were investigated. CAM boots can be seen to restrict ankle RoM, however, neighboring joints such as the knee and hip do have kinetic and kinematic compensatory alterations. Plantar pressure of the forefoot is effectively redistributed to the hindfoot by CAM boots.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The compensatory mechanisms at the hip and knee joint during CAM boot wear could explain the secondary site pain often reported in patients, specifically at the ipsilateral knee and contralateral hip. Although CAM boots can be used to restrict ankle motion, this review has highlighted a lack of in-boot kinematic analyses during CAM boot use, where tracking markers are placed on the anatomical structure rather than on the boot, or through video fluoroscopy, urging the need for a more robust methodological approach to achieve this. There is a need for studies to assess the biomechanical alterations caused by CAM boots in populations living with foot and ankle pathologies. Future research, adopting a longitudinal study design, is required to fully understand the effectiveness of CAM boots for rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"e12044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633339/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.12044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.12044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:可控踝关节活动(CAM)靴是一种膝下矫形器,用于治疗足踝损伤,以减少踝关节活动范围(RoM),减轻足踝负担,同时允许在恢复期间继续行走。目的:总结穿戴 CAM 靴作为限制踝关节活动范围和减轻足部负担的矫形器的生物力学效果:根据 PRISMA 2020 指南进行了系统性文献综述。所有论文均由两位作者独立筛选后纳入。采用乔安娜-布里格斯批判性评估检查表对方法学质量进行评估。对所有符合条件的论文进行了叙述性综合:共纳入 13 项研究,涉及 197 名参与者(男性 113 人,女性 84 人)。所有研究都是准随机的,并采用了研究内设计,其中 12 项研究包括一个对照组,并对一系列 CAM 靴子进行了调查。可以看出,CAM 靴子限制了踝关节的 RoM,但是,膝关节和髋关节等邻近关节确实出现了动力学和运动学上的代偿性改变。CAM 靴子能有效地将前脚掌的足底压力重新分配到后脚掌:结论:穿着 CAM 靴期间,髋关节和膝关节的代偿机制可以解释患者经常报告的继发性疼痛,特别是同侧膝关节和对侧髋关节的疼痛。虽然 CAM 靴可用于限制踝关节运动,但本综述强调了缺乏对穿着 CAM 靴期间的靴内运动学分析,即在解剖结构上而非靴子上放置跟踪标记,或通过视频透视进行分析,因此需要更稳健的方法来实现这一目标。有必要开展研究,以评估 CAM 靴对患有足踝疾病的人群造成的生物力学改变。未来的研究需要采用纵向研究设计,以充分了解 CAM 靴对康复的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanical effectiveness of controlled ankle motion boots: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Introduction: Controlled ankle motion (CAM) boots are a below-knee orthotic device prescribed for the management of foot and ankle injuries to reduce ankle range of motion (RoM) and offload the foot and ankle whilst allowing continued ambulation during recovery. There is a lack of clarity within the current literature surrounding the biomechanical understanding and effectiveness of CAM boots.

Aims: To summarise the biomechanical effects of CAM boot wear as an orthotic for restricting ankle RoM and offloading the foot.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. All papers were independently screened by two authors for inclusion. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal checklists. A narrative synthesis of all eligible papers was produced.

Results: Thirteen studies involving 197 participants (113 male and 84 female) were included. All studies were quasi-randomised and employed a within-study design, of which 12 studies included a control group and a range of CAM boots were investigated. CAM boots can be seen to restrict ankle RoM, however, neighboring joints such as the knee and hip do have kinetic and kinematic compensatory alterations. Plantar pressure of the forefoot is effectively redistributed to the hindfoot by CAM boots.

Conclusion: The compensatory mechanisms at the hip and knee joint during CAM boot wear could explain the secondary site pain often reported in patients, specifically at the ipsilateral knee and contralateral hip. Although CAM boots can be used to restrict ankle motion, this review has highlighted a lack of in-boot kinematic analyses during CAM boot use, where tracking markers are placed on the anatomical structure rather than on the boot, or through video fluoroscopy, urging the need for a more robust methodological approach to achieve this. There is a need for studies to assess the biomechanical alterations caused by CAM boots in populations living with foot and ankle pathologies. Future research, adopting a longitudinal study design, is required to fully understand the effectiveness of CAM boots for rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信