对抗牲畜抗生素病原体的天然方法:芙蓉酸是一种前景广阔的解决方案。

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinarni Medicina Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.17221/105/2023-VETMED
Esmeralda Rangel-Vargas, Carlos Alberto Gomez-Aldapa, Reyna Nallely Falfan-Cortes, Fabiola Araceli Guzman-Ortiz, Javier Castro-Rosas
{"title":"对抗牲畜抗生素病原体的天然方法:芙蓉酸是一种前景广阔的解决方案。","authors":"Esmeralda Rangel-Vargas, Carlos Alberto Gomez-Aldapa, Reyna Nallely Falfan-Cortes, Fabiola Araceli Guzman-Ortiz, Javier Castro-Rosas","doi":"10.17221/105/2023-VETMED","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) and <i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and <i>Salmonella</i>. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log<sub>10</sub> colony forming units (CFUs) of <i>S. </i>Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or <i>Salmonella</i> in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":23532,"journal":{"name":"Veterinarni Medicina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11251701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A natural approach to combating antibiotic-resistant pathogens in livestock: <i>Hibiscus sabdariffa</i>-derived hibiscus acid as a promising solution.\",\"authors\":\"Esmeralda Rangel-Vargas, Carlos Alberto Gomez-Aldapa, Reyna Nallely Falfan-Cortes, Fabiola Araceli Guzman-Ortiz, Javier Castro-Rosas\",\"doi\":\"10.17221/105/2023-VETMED\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) and <i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and <i>Salmonella</i>. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log<sub>10</sub> colony forming units (CFUs) of <i>S. </i>Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or <i>Salmonella</i> in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinarni Medicina\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11251701/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinarni Medicina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17221/105/2023-VETMED\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinarni Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/105/2023-VETMED","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了链霉素、木槿酸及其复方制剂对小鼠体内产生多重耐药志贺毒素的大肠埃希菌(STEC)和鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的抗菌效果。我们测定了链霉素、木槿酸及其复方制剂对 STEC 和沙门氏菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MBC)。实验使用了 15 组小鼠,每组 6 只:6 组小鼠口服 4 log10 菌落总数(CFU)的鼠伤寒沙门氏菌,6 组小鼠口服 STEC,3 组小鼠作为对照组。接种后六小时,特定组的小鼠分别接受含 5 和 7 毫克/毫升木槿酸、50 和 450 微克/毫升链霉素、木槿酸/链霉素(5 毫克/毫升木槿酸和 50 微克/毫升链霉素)或等渗盐水的口服液。研究确定了 7 毫克/毫升木槿酸、300 和 450 微克/毫升链霉素以及两种浓度的木槿酸/链霉素(3 毫克/毫升/20 微克/毫升和 5 毫克/毫升/50 微克/毫升)的 MIC 和 MBC。有趣的是,受感染的小鼠在接受 7 毫克/毫升的木槿酸单独或与链霉素联合治疗后,其粪便样本中没有 STEC 或沙门氏菌,也没有小鼠死亡。相比之下,未经处理的小鼠和只用链霉素处理的小鼠粪便中含有病原体,导致所有实验对象死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A natural approach to combating antibiotic-resistant pathogens in livestock: Hibiscus sabdariffa-derived hibiscus acid as a promising solution.

We examined the antibacterial efficacy of streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against multidrug-resistant Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella Typhimurium in mice. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for streptomycin, hibiscus acid, and their combination against STEC and Salmonella. Fifteen sets of six mice in each set were utilised: six groups were orally exposed to 4 log10 colony forming units (CFUs) of S. Typhimurium and another six to STEC, and three acted as the controls. Six hours post-inoculation, specific groups of mice received either oral solutions containing hibiscus acid at 5 and 7 mg/ml; streptomycin at 50 and 450 μg/ml; hibiscus acid/streptomycin (5 mg/ml hibiscus acid and 50 μg/ml streptomycin); or isotonic saline. The study determined the MIC and MBC of 7 mg/ml of hibiscus acid; 300 and 450 μg/ml of streptomycin; and two concentrations of hibiscus/streptomycin (3 mg/ml / 20 μg/ml and 5 mg/ml / 50 μg/ml). Interestingly, the mice that were infected and subsequently treated with hibiscus acid at 7 mg/ml alone or in conjunction with streptomycin did not have either STEC or Salmonella in their faecal samples, and none of the mice died. In contrast, the untreated mice and those exclusively treated with streptomycin had the pathogens present in their stool, leading to the mortality of all the subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinarni Medicina
Veterinarni Medicina Veterinary Sciences-兽医学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Veterinarni Medicina publishes in English original papers, short communications, critical reviews and case reports from all fields of veterinary and biomedical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信