Clarus 曲霉菌半乳甘露聚糖酶联免疫测定原型用于诊断支气管肺泡灌洗液中的侵袭性肺部曲霉菌病的比较分析。

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q2 MYCOLOGY
Sarah Sedik, Johannes Boyer, Matthias Egger, Karl Dichtl, Juergen Prattes, Florian Prüller, Martin Hoenigl
{"title":"Clarus 曲霉菌半乳甘露聚糖酶联免疫测定原型用于诊断支气管肺泡灌洗液中的侵袭性肺部曲霉菌病的比较分析。","authors":"Sarah Sedik, Johannes Boyer, Matthias Egger, Karl Dichtl, Juergen Prattes, Florian Prüller, Martin Hoenigl","doi":"10.1007/s11046-024-00876-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Galactomannan (GM) testing using Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay (Platelia AGM) from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) aids in early diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Globally, only a minority of laboratories have the capability to perform on-site GM testing, necessitating accessible and affordable alternatives. Hence, we conducted a comparative evaluation of the new clarus Aspergillus GM enzyme immunoassay prototype (clarus AGM prototype) with Platelia AGM using BALF samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study, where Platelia AGM testing was routinely performed followed by clarus AGM prototype testing in those with true positive or true negative AGM test results according to the 2020 EORTC/MSG and the 2024 FUNDICU consensus definitions. Descriptive statistics, ROC curve analysis, and Spearman's correlation analysis were used to evaluate analytical performance of the clarus AGM prototype assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 259 adult patients, of which 53 (20%) were classified as probable IPA, while 206 did not fulfill IPA-criteria. Spearman's correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation between the two assays (rho = 0.727, p < 0.001). The clarus AGM prototype had a sensitivity of 96% (51/53) and a specificity of 74% (153/206) for differentiating probable versus no IPA when using the manufacturer recommended cut-off. ROC curve analysis showed an AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.901-0.971) for the clarus AGM prototype, while the Platelia AGM yielded an AUC of 0.918 (95% CI 0.876-0.959).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clarus AGM prototype demonstrated a strong correlation and promising test performance, comparable to Platelia AGM, rendering it a viable alternative in patients at risk of IPA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19017,"journal":{"name":"Mycopathologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11258175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of the Clarus Aspergillus Galactomannan Enzyme Immunoassay Prototype for the Diagnosis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Sedik, Johannes Boyer, Matthias Egger, Karl Dichtl, Juergen Prattes, Florian Prüller, Martin Hoenigl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11046-024-00876-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Galactomannan (GM) testing using Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay (Platelia AGM) from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) aids in early diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Globally, only a minority of laboratories have the capability to perform on-site GM testing, necessitating accessible and affordable alternatives. Hence, we conducted a comparative evaluation of the new clarus Aspergillus GM enzyme immunoassay prototype (clarus AGM prototype) with Platelia AGM using BALF samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study, where Platelia AGM testing was routinely performed followed by clarus AGM prototype testing in those with true positive or true negative AGM test results according to the 2020 EORTC/MSG and the 2024 FUNDICU consensus definitions. Descriptive statistics, ROC curve analysis, and Spearman's correlation analysis were used to evaluate analytical performance of the clarus AGM prototype assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 259 adult patients, of which 53 (20%) were classified as probable IPA, while 206 did not fulfill IPA-criteria. Spearman's correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation between the two assays (rho = 0.727, p < 0.001). The clarus AGM prototype had a sensitivity of 96% (51/53) and a specificity of 74% (153/206) for differentiating probable versus no IPA when using the manufacturer recommended cut-off. ROC curve analysis showed an AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.901-0.971) for the clarus AGM prototype, while the Platelia AGM yielded an AUC of 0.918 (95% CI 0.876-0.959).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clarus AGM prototype demonstrated a strong correlation and promising test performance, comparable to Platelia AGM, rendering it a viable alternative in patients at risk of IPA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mycopathologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11258175/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mycopathologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-024-00876-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycopathologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-024-00876-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用 Platelia 曲霉菌酶联免疫分析法(Platelia AGM)检测支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中的半乳糖甘露聚糖(GM)有助于早期诊断侵袭性肺曲霉菌病(IPA)。在全球范围内,只有少数实验室有能力进行现场 GM 检测,这就需要有方便且经济实惠的替代方法。因此,我们使用 BALF 样品对新型 clarus 曲霉菌基因改造酶免疫测定原型(clarus AGM 原型)与 Platelia AGM 进行了比较评估:这是一项单中心、前瞻性、横断面研究,根据2020年EORTC/MSG和2024年FUNDICU共识定义,在对AGM检测结果为真阳性或真阴性的患者进行常规Platelia AGM检测后,再进行clarus AGM原型检测。研究采用了描述性统计、ROC 曲线分析和斯皮尔曼相关性分析来评估 clarus AGM 原型检测的分析性能:本研究共纳入 259 名成年患者,其中 53 人(20%)被归类为可能的 IPA,206 人不符合 IPA 标准。斯皮尔曼相关性分析表明,这两种检测方法之间存在很强的相关性(rho = 0.727,p 结论:Clarus AGM 原型检测方法显示出很强的相关性:Clarus AGM原型与Platelia AGM具有很强的相关性和很好的测试性能,使其成为有IPA风险的患者的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Analysis of the Clarus Aspergillus Galactomannan Enzyme Immunoassay Prototype for the Diagnosis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.

Comparative Analysis of the Clarus Aspergillus Galactomannan Enzyme Immunoassay Prototype for the Diagnosis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.

Background: Galactomannan (GM) testing using Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay (Platelia AGM) from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) aids in early diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Globally, only a minority of laboratories have the capability to perform on-site GM testing, necessitating accessible and affordable alternatives. Hence, we conducted a comparative evaluation of the new clarus Aspergillus GM enzyme immunoassay prototype (clarus AGM prototype) with Platelia AGM using BALF samples.

Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study, where Platelia AGM testing was routinely performed followed by clarus AGM prototype testing in those with true positive or true negative AGM test results according to the 2020 EORTC/MSG and the 2024 FUNDICU consensus definitions. Descriptive statistics, ROC curve analysis, and Spearman's correlation analysis were used to evaluate analytical performance of the clarus AGM prototype assay.

Results: This study enrolled 259 adult patients, of which 53 (20%) were classified as probable IPA, while 206 did not fulfill IPA-criteria. Spearman's correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation between the two assays (rho = 0.727, p < 0.001). The clarus AGM prototype had a sensitivity of 96% (51/53) and a specificity of 74% (153/206) for differentiating probable versus no IPA when using the manufacturer recommended cut-off. ROC curve analysis showed an AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.901-0.971) for the clarus AGM prototype, while the Platelia AGM yielded an AUC of 0.918 (95% CI 0.876-0.959).

Conclusions: Clarus AGM prototype demonstrated a strong correlation and promising test performance, comparable to Platelia AGM, rendering it a viable alternative in patients at risk of IPA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mycopathologia
Mycopathologia 生物-真菌学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
76
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Mycopathologia is an official journal of the International Union of Microbiological Societies (IUMS). Mycopathologia was founded in 1938 with the mission to ‘diffuse the understanding of fungal diseases in man and animals among mycologists’. Many of the milestones discoveries in the field of medical mycology have been communicated through the pages of this journal. Mycopathologia covers a diverse, interdisciplinary range of topics that is unique in breadth and depth. The journal publishes peer-reviewed, original articles highlighting important developments concerning medically important fungi and fungal diseases. The journal highlights important developments in fungal systematics and taxonomy, laboratory diagnosis of fungal infections, antifungal drugs, clinical presentation and treatment, and epidemiology of fungal diseases globally. Timely opinion articles, mini-reviews, and other communications are usually invited at the discretion of the editorial board. Unique case reports highlighting unprecedented progress in the diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections, are published in every issue of the journal. MycopathologiaIMAGE is another regular feature for a brief clinical report of potential interest to a mixed audience of physicians and laboratory scientists. MycopathologiaGENOME is designed for the rapid publication of new genomes of human and animal pathogenic fungi using a checklist-based, standardized format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信