关于萎缩下颌骨后部短种植体周围骨质流失风险的有限元研究。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Ivan Onone Gialain, Marlene Kasumi Gantier-Takano, Leonardo Folmer Rodrigues da Silva, Marina Guimarães Roscoe, Otavio Henrique Pinhata-Baptista, Josete Barbosa Cruz Meira, Alex Siu Lun Fok
{"title":"关于萎缩下颌骨后部短种植体周围骨质流失风险的有限元研究。","authors":"Ivan Onone Gialain, Marlene Kasumi Gantier-Takano, Leonardo Folmer Rodrigues da Silva, Marina Guimarães Roscoe, Otavio Henrique Pinhata-Baptista, Josete Barbosa Cruz Meira, Alex Siu Lun Fok","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the risk of bone loss around single short molar crown-supporting implants in an atrophic mandible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implants of different lengths (L = 4 or 6 mm) and diameters (Ø = 4.1 or 4.8 mm) were placed in the molar area of an atrophic mandible. Additional control mandible models were simulated for 4.1 mm diameter implants (L = 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm). A vertical masticatory load of 200 N was applied to three or six occlusal contact areas (3ca or 6ca) of the prosthetic crown. The bone strain energy density (SED) of 109.6 µJ/mm<sup>3</sup> was assumed to be the pathological threshold for cortical bone. The peri-implant bone resorption risk index (PIBRri) was calculated by dividing the maximum SED of the crestal cortical bone by the SED pathological threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increasing the implant length from 4 to 6 mm, implant diameter from 4.1 to 4.8 mm, and number of contact areas from 3 to 6 reduced the SED and PIBRri values by approximately 20%, 35%, and 40%, respectively, when comparing pairs of models that isolated a specific variable. All models with 6ca had a low bone resorption risk (PIBRri<0.8), while the Ø4.1 short implant with 3ca had a medium (0.8≤PIBRri≤1.0) or high (PIBRri>1.0) resorption risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing the diameter or occlusal contact area of a 4 mm short implant in an atrophic mandible resulted in reduced bone resorption risks, similar to or lower than those observed in a regular mandible with standard-length implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A finite element study on the risk of bone loss around posterior short implants in an atrophic mandible.\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Onone Gialain, Marlene Kasumi Gantier-Takano, Leonardo Folmer Rodrigues da Silva, Marina Guimarães Roscoe, Otavio Henrique Pinhata-Baptista, Josete Barbosa Cruz Meira, Alex Siu Lun Fok\",\"doi\":\"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the risk of bone loss around single short molar crown-supporting implants in an atrophic mandible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implants of different lengths (L = 4 or 6 mm) and diameters (Ø = 4.1 or 4.8 mm) were placed in the molar area of an atrophic mandible. Additional control mandible models were simulated for 4.1 mm diameter implants (L = 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm). A vertical masticatory load of 200 N was applied to three or six occlusal contact areas (3ca or 6ca) of the prosthetic crown. The bone strain energy density (SED) of 109.6 µJ/mm<sup>3</sup> was assumed to be the pathological threshold for cortical bone. The peri-implant bone resorption risk index (PIBRri) was calculated by dividing the maximum SED of the crestal cortical bone by the SED pathological threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increasing the implant length from 4 to 6 mm, implant diameter from 4.1 to 4.8 mm, and number of contact areas from 3 to 6 reduced the SED and PIBRri values by approximately 20%, 35%, and 40%, respectively, when comparing pairs of models that isolated a specific variable. All models with 6ca had a low bone resorption risk (PIBRri<0.8), while the Ø4.1 short implant with 3ca had a medium (0.8≤PIBRri≤1.0) or high (PIBRri>1.0) resorption risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing the diameter or occlusal contact area of a 4 mm short implant in an atrophic mandible resulted in reduced bone resorption risks, similar to or lower than those observed in a regular mandible with standard-length implants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估萎缩下颌骨中单颗短磨牙牙冠支撑种植体周围骨质流失的风险:在萎缩下颌骨的磨牙区植入不同长度(L = 4 或 6 毫米)和直径(Ø = 4.1 或 4.8 毫米)的种植体。另外还模拟了直径为 4.1 毫米的种植体(L = 4、6、8 和 10 毫米)的对照下颌骨模型。对修复冠的三个或六个咬合接触区(3ca 或 6ca)施加 200 N 的垂直咀嚼负荷。假定皮质骨的病理阈值为骨应变能密度(SED)109.6 µJ/mm3。种植体周围骨吸收风险指数(PIBRri)的计算方法是将骨冠皮质骨的最大 SED 除以 SED 病理学阈值:将种植体长度从 4 毫米增加到 6 毫米,种植体直径从 4.1 毫米增加到 4.8 毫米,接触区数量从 3 个增加到 6 个,在比较孤立于特定变量的几对模型时,SED 和 PIBRri 值分别降低了约 20%、35% 和 40%。所有带有 6ca 的模型的骨吸收风险都很低(PIBRri1.0):增加萎缩下颌骨中4毫米短种植体的直径或咬合接触面积可降低骨吸收风险,其风险与使用标准长度种植体的正常下颌骨中观察到的风险相似或更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A finite element study on the risk of bone loss around posterior short implants in an atrophic mandible.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of bone loss around single short molar crown-supporting implants in an atrophic mandible.

Methods: Implants of different lengths (L = 4 or 6 mm) and diameters (Ø = 4.1 or 4.8 mm) were placed in the molar area of an atrophic mandible. Additional control mandible models were simulated for 4.1 mm diameter implants (L = 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm). A vertical masticatory load of 200 N was applied to three or six occlusal contact areas (3ca or 6ca) of the prosthetic crown. The bone strain energy density (SED) of 109.6 µJ/mm3 was assumed to be the pathological threshold for cortical bone. The peri-implant bone resorption risk index (PIBRri) was calculated by dividing the maximum SED of the crestal cortical bone by the SED pathological threshold.

Results: Increasing the implant length from 4 to 6 mm, implant diameter from 4.1 to 4.8 mm, and number of contact areas from 3 to 6 reduced the SED and PIBRri values by approximately 20%, 35%, and 40%, respectively, when comparing pairs of models that isolated a specific variable. All models with 6ca had a low bone resorption risk (PIBRri<0.8), while the Ø4.1 short implant with 3ca had a medium (0.8≤PIBRri≤1.0) or high (PIBRri>1.0) resorption risk.

Conclusions: Increasing the diameter or occlusal contact area of a 4 mm short implant in an atrophic mandible resulted in reduced bone resorption risks, similar to or lower than those observed in a regular mandible with standard-length implants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信