使用计算机断层扫描滴注胆管造影术预测腹腔镜胆囊切除术的术中手术难度。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Atsuro Fujinaga, Teijiro Hirashita, Yuichi Endo, Hiroki Orimoto, Shota Amano, Masahiro Kawamura, Takahide Kawasaki, Takashi Masuda, Masafumi Inomata
{"title":"使用计算机断层扫描滴注胆管造影术预测腹腔镜胆囊切除术的术中手术难度。","authors":"Atsuro Fujinaga,&nbsp;Teijiro Hirashita,&nbsp;Yuichi Endo,&nbsp;Hiroki Orimoto,&nbsp;Shota Amano,&nbsp;Masahiro Kawamura,&nbsp;Takahide Kawasaki,&nbsp;Takashi Masuda,&nbsp;Masafumi Inomata","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Although findings from drip infusion cholangiography with computed tomography (DIC-CT) are useful in preoperative anatomic evaluation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), their relationship with intraoperative surgical difficulty based on the difficulty score (DS) proposed by Tokyo Guidelines 2018 is unclear. We examined this relationship.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were collected from 202 patients who underwent LC for benign gallbladder (GB) disease with preoperative DIC-CT in our department. DIC-CT findings were classified into GB-positive and GB-negative groups based on GB opacification, and clinical characteristics were compared. DS assessed only on findings from around Calot's triangle was considered “cDS”, and patients were divided into cDS ≤2 and ≥3 groups. Preoperative data including DIC-CT findings were evaluated using multivariate analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>DIC-CT findings showed 151 (74.8%) GB-positive and 51 (25.2%) GB-negative patients. Surgical outcomes were significantly better in the GB-positive versus GB-negative group for operation time (107 vs. 154 min, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), blood loss (8 vs. 25 mL, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), cDS (0.8 vs. 2.2, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), and critical view of safety score (4.0 vs. 3.1, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). cDS was ≤2 in 174 (86.1%) and ≥3 in 28 (13.9%) patients. By multivariate analysis, DIC-CT findings and alkaline phosphatase values were independent factors predicting intraoperative difficulty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>DIC-CT findings are useful for predicting cDS in LC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of intraoperative surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using drip infusion cholangiography with computed tomography\",\"authors\":\"Atsuro Fujinaga,&nbsp;Teijiro Hirashita,&nbsp;Yuichi Endo,&nbsp;Hiroki Orimoto,&nbsp;Shota Amano,&nbsp;Masahiro Kawamura,&nbsp;Takahide Kawasaki,&nbsp;Takashi Masuda,&nbsp;Masafumi Inomata\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.12044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although findings from drip infusion cholangiography with computed tomography (DIC-CT) are useful in preoperative anatomic evaluation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), their relationship with intraoperative surgical difficulty based on the difficulty score (DS) proposed by Tokyo Guidelines 2018 is unclear. We examined this relationship.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data were collected from 202 patients who underwent LC for benign gallbladder (GB) disease with preoperative DIC-CT in our department. DIC-CT findings were classified into GB-positive and GB-negative groups based on GB opacification, and clinical characteristics were compared. DS assessed only on findings from around Calot's triangle was considered “cDS”, and patients were divided into cDS ≤2 and ≥3 groups. Preoperative data including DIC-CT findings were evaluated using multivariate analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>DIC-CT findings showed 151 (74.8%) GB-positive and 51 (25.2%) GB-negative patients. Surgical outcomes were significantly better in the GB-positive versus GB-negative group for operation time (107 vs. 154 min, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), blood loss (8 vs. 25 mL, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), cDS (0.8 vs. 2.2, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), and critical view of safety score (4.0 vs. 3.1, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). cDS was ≤2 in 174 (86.1%) and ≥3 in 28 (13.9%) patients. By multivariate analysis, DIC-CT findings and alkaline phosphatase values were independent factors predicting intraoperative difficulty.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>DIC-CT findings are useful for predicting cDS in LC.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然滴注胆管造影与计算机断层扫描(DIC-CT)的结果有助于腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的术前解剖学评估,但根据《东京指南 2018》提出的难度评分(DS),它们与术中手术难度的关系尚不明确。我们对这种关系进行了研究:我们收集了 202 名在我科接受 LC 治疗良性胆囊(GB)疾病且术前有 DIC-CT 的患者的数据。根据胆囊不透明程度将 DIC-CT 结果分为胆囊阳性组和胆囊阴性组,并比较其临床特征。仅根据 Calot 三角区周围的结果评估的 DS 被视为 "cDS",患者被分为 cDS ≤2 组和 ≥3 组。采用多变量分析对术前数据(包括 DIC-CT 结果)进行评估:DIC-CT结果显示,151例(74.8%)GB阳性患者和51例(25.2%)GB阴性患者。在手术时间方面,GB 阳性组的手术效果明显优于 GB 阴性组(107 分钟对 154 分钟,P 结论:DIC-CT 检查结果可用于诊断胃癌:DIC-CT 结果有助于预测 LC 的 cDS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of intraoperative surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using drip infusion cholangiography with computed tomography

Background

Although findings from drip infusion cholangiography with computed tomography (DIC-CT) are useful in preoperative anatomic evaluation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), their relationship with intraoperative surgical difficulty based on the difficulty score (DS) proposed by Tokyo Guidelines 2018 is unclear. We examined this relationship.

Methods

Data were collected from 202 patients who underwent LC for benign gallbladder (GB) disease with preoperative DIC-CT in our department. DIC-CT findings were classified into GB-positive and GB-negative groups based on GB opacification, and clinical characteristics were compared. DS assessed only on findings from around Calot's triangle was considered “cDS”, and patients were divided into cDS ≤2 and ≥3 groups. Preoperative data including DIC-CT findings were evaluated using multivariate analysis.

Results

DIC-CT findings showed 151 (74.8%) GB-positive and 51 (25.2%) GB-negative patients. Surgical outcomes were significantly better in the GB-positive versus GB-negative group for operation time (107 vs. 154 min, p < .001), blood loss (8 vs. 25 mL, p < .001), cDS (0.8 vs. 2.2, p < .001), and critical view of safety score (4.0 vs. 3.1, p < .001). cDS was ≤2 in 174 (86.1%) and ≥3 in 28 (13.9%) patients. By multivariate analysis, DIC-CT findings and alkaline phosphatase values were independent factors predicting intraoperative difficulty.

Conclusion

DIC-CT findings are useful for predicting cDS in LC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信