在表皮生长因子受体突变的非小细胞肺癌中减少奥希替尼的用药次数:真实世界的数据。

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2024.1721
Vanita Noronha, Harsh Sahu, Akhil Kapoor, Vijay Patil, Nandini Menon, Minit Shah, Dilan Davis, Rumeli Roy, Srigadha Vivek, Amit Janu, Rajiv Kaushal, Kumar Prabhash
{"title":"在表皮生长因子受体突变的非小细胞肺癌中减少奥希替尼的用药次数:真实世界的数据。","authors":"Vanita Noronha, Harsh Sahu, Akhil Kapoor, Vijay Patil, Nandini Menon, Minit Shah, Dilan Davis, Rumeli Roy, Srigadha Vivek, Amit Janu, Rajiv Kaushal, Kumar Prabhash","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2024.1721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osimertinib is more efficacious and as safe as first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, osimertinib is not affordable for most patients in developing nations. Moreover, the minimum biologically effective dose of osimertinib may be less than the approved dose.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational multicentric study aimed to describe the efficacy (objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)) and toxicity of osimertinib 80 mg orally administered less frequently than daily (ranging from every other day to once-a-week) in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2021 and August 2023, we enrolled 22 patients. Six received osimertinib 80 mg once-a-week, nine received 80 mg once-in-3-days and seven received 80 mg on alternate days. Responses included 0 complete responses, 7 (31.8%) partial responses, 9 (40.9%) stable disease and 5 (22.7%) progressive disease. ORR was 31.8%, and DCR was 72.7%. Median PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-15.7), and median OS was 17.8 months (95% CI, 3.2-32.6). In patients who received reduced frequency osimertinib in the second line and beyond, the ORR was 29.4%, DCR was 70.5%, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1.1-10.6) and median OS was 17.6 months (95% CI, 2.9-32.2). Grade 3 and higher toxicities were noted in 8 (36.3%) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Less frequent dosing of osimertinib may be a valid treatment option, especially in the second line and beyond setting in patients who cannot afford full dose daily osimertinib. This may provide an additional treatment option with a similar toxicity profile as that of standard dose osimertinib.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced frequency dosing of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung carcinoma: real world data.\",\"authors\":\"Vanita Noronha, Harsh Sahu, Akhil Kapoor, Vijay Patil, Nandini Menon, Minit Shah, Dilan Davis, Rumeli Roy, Srigadha Vivek, Amit Janu, Rajiv Kaushal, Kumar Prabhash\",\"doi\":\"10.3332/ecancer.2024.1721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osimertinib is more efficacious and as safe as first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, osimertinib is not affordable for most patients in developing nations. Moreover, the minimum biologically effective dose of osimertinib may be less than the approved dose.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational multicentric study aimed to describe the efficacy (objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)) and toxicity of osimertinib 80 mg orally administered less frequently than daily (ranging from every other day to once-a-week) in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2021 and August 2023, we enrolled 22 patients. Six received osimertinib 80 mg once-a-week, nine received 80 mg once-in-3-days and seven received 80 mg on alternate days. Responses included 0 complete responses, 7 (31.8%) partial responses, 9 (40.9%) stable disease and 5 (22.7%) progressive disease. ORR was 31.8%, and DCR was 72.7%. Median PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-15.7), and median OS was 17.8 months (95% CI, 3.2-32.6). In patients who received reduced frequency osimertinib in the second line and beyond, the ORR was 29.4%, DCR was 70.5%, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1.1-10.6) and median OS was 17.6 months (95% CI, 2.9-32.2). Grade 3 and higher toxicities were noted in 8 (36.3%) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Less frequent dosing of osimertinib may be a valid treatment option, especially in the second line and beyond setting in patients who cannot afford full dose daily osimertinib. This may provide an additional treatment option with a similar toxicity profile as that of standard dose osimertinib.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ecancermedicalscience\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254406/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ecancermedicalscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2024.1721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2024.1721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介与第一代表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)导向的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂相比,奥希替尼更有效、更安全。然而,发展中国家的大多数患者都负担不起奥希替尼。此外,奥希替尼的最小生物有效剂量可能低于批准剂量:这是一项回顾性多中心观察研究,旨在描述在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌患者中口服奥希替尼80毫克的疗效(客观反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS))和毒性:2021年1月至2023年8月期间,我们共招募了22名患者。6名患者接受了每周一次、每次80毫克的奥西美替尼治疗,9名患者接受了3天一次、每次80毫克的奥西美替尼治疗,7名患者接受了隔天一次、每次80毫克的奥西美替尼治疗。应答包括0例完全应答、7例(31.8%)部分应答、9例(40.9%)病情稳定和5例(22.7%)病情进展。ORR为31.8%,DCR为72.7%。中位 PFS 为 9.2 个月(95% 置信区间为 2.9-15.7),中位 OS 为 17.8 个月(95% 置信区间为 3.2-32.6)。在二线及二线以上接受减量奥希替尼治疗的患者中,ORR为29.4%,DCR为70.5%,中位PFS为5.9个月(95% CI,1.1-10.6),中位OS为17.6个月(95% CI,2.9-32.2)。8名患者(36.3%)出现3级及以上毒性反应:结论:减少奥希替尼的给药次数可能是一种有效的治疗选择,尤其是在二线及二线以上治疗中,对于无法负担每日全剂量奥希替尼的患者而言。这可能提供了一种额外的治疗选择,其毒性情况与标准剂量奥希替尼相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reduced frequency dosing of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung carcinoma: real world data.

Introduction: Osimertinib is more efficacious and as safe as first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, osimertinib is not affordable for most patients in developing nations. Moreover, the minimum biologically effective dose of osimertinib may be less than the approved dose.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective observational multicentric study aimed to describe the efficacy (objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)) and toxicity of osimertinib 80 mg orally administered less frequently than daily (ranging from every other day to once-a-week) in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

Results: Between January 2021 and August 2023, we enrolled 22 patients. Six received osimertinib 80 mg once-a-week, nine received 80 mg once-in-3-days and seven received 80 mg on alternate days. Responses included 0 complete responses, 7 (31.8%) partial responses, 9 (40.9%) stable disease and 5 (22.7%) progressive disease. ORR was 31.8%, and DCR was 72.7%. Median PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-15.7), and median OS was 17.8 months (95% CI, 3.2-32.6). In patients who received reduced frequency osimertinib in the second line and beyond, the ORR was 29.4%, DCR was 70.5%, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1.1-10.6) and median OS was 17.6 months (95% CI, 2.9-32.2). Grade 3 and higher toxicities were noted in 8 (36.3%) patients.

Conclusion: Less frequent dosing of osimertinib may be a valid treatment option, especially in the second line and beyond setting in patients who cannot afford full dose daily osimertinib. This may provide an additional treatment option with a similar toxicity profile as that of standard dose osimertinib.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信