{"title":"肥厚型心肌病患者的药物疗效比较:网络 Meta 分析","authors":"Erhan Shang, Hongmei Tan PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of various commonly used drugs in treating patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Randomized controlled trials on drugs for HCM treatment were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (search cutoff: January 10, 2024). Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias tool, and data analysis used R software. Seventeen studies (1,133 patients with HCM) were included. The network meta-analysis indicated that mavacamten and perhexiline improved peak oxygen consumption compared with placebo. Mavacamten reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular mass index, left atrial volume index, and septal E/e′ ratio. Losartan decreased systolic blood pressure, whereas candesartan, mavacamten, and valsartan reduced maximum wall thickness. Perhexiline had better efficacy in increasing peak oxygen consumption, and candesartan in reducing maximum wall thickness. No drug significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction compared with placebo. In conclusion, on the basis of current studies, commonly used drugs may effectively improve some of the outcome measures in patients with HCM, whereas the novel drug mavacamten showed significant therapeutic effects in most of the remaining outcome measures except for left ventricular ejection fraction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"226 ","pages":"Pages 97-107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924005137/pdfft?md5=a3fb8e1cc18fb7a2538a18897947eefd&pid=1-s2.0-S0002914924005137-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Drug Therapy Efficacy in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Network Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Erhan Shang, Hongmei Tan PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of various commonly used drugs in treating patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Randomized controlled trials on drugs for HCM treatment were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (search cutoff: January 10, 2024). Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias tool, and data analysis used R software. Seventeen studies (1,133 patients with HCM) were included. The network meta-analysis indicated that mavacamten and perhexiline improved peak oxygen consumption compared with placebo. Mavacamten reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular mass index, left atrial volume index, and septal E/e′ ratio. Losartan decreased systolic blood pressure, whereas candesartan, mavacamten, and valsartan reduced maximum wall thickness. Perhexiline had better efficacy in increasing peak oxygen consumption, and candesartan in reducing maximum wall thickness. No drug significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction compared with placebo. In conclusion, on the basis of current studies, commonly used drugs may effectively improve some of the outcome measures in patients with HCM, whereas the novel drug mavacamten showed significant therapeutic effects in most of the remaining outcome measures except for left ventricular ejection fraction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 97-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924005137/pdfft?md5=a3fb8e1cc18fb7a2538a18897947eefd&pid=1-s2.0-S0002914924005137-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924005137\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924005137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在比较各种常用药物在治疗肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者方面的疗效。从 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 中检索了有关治疗肥厚型心肌病药物的随机对照试验(检索截止日期:2024 年 1 月 10 日)。使用偏倚风险工具进行质量评估,并使用 R 软件进行数据分析。共纳入 17 篇文章(1133 名 HCM 患者)。NMA表明,与安慰剂相比,马伐康坦和哌西林可改善峰值氧耗量(pVO2)。马伐康坦可降低 N 端前 B 型钠尿肽(NT-pro-BNP)、左心室质量指数(LVMI)、左心房容积指数(LAVI)和室间隔 E/e' 比值。洛沙坦能降低收缩压,而坎地沙坦、马伐沙坦和缬沙坦能降低最大室壁厚度。培合西林对提高 pVO2 有更好的疗效,而坎地沙坦则对降低最大室壁厚度有更好的疗效。与安慰剂相比,没有一种药物能明显改善左心室射血分数(LVEF)。总之,根据目前的研究,常用药物可有效改善 HCM 患者的部分预后指标,而新型药物马伐卡坦对除 LVEF 外的其余大部分预后指标均有显著疗效。
Comparison of Drug Therapy Efficacy in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Network Meta-Analysis
The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of various commonly used drugs in treating patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Randomized controlled trials on drugs for HCM treatment were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (search cutoff: January 10, 2024). Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias tool, and data analysis used R software. Seventeen studies (1,133 patients with HCM) were included. The network meta-analysis indicated that mavacamten and perhexiline improved peak oxygen consumption compared with placebo. Mavacamten reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular mass index, left atrial volume index, and septal E/e′ ratio. Losartan decreased systolic blood pressure, whereas candesartan, mavacamten, and valsartan reduced maximum wall thickness. Perhexiline had better efficacy in increasing peak oxygen consumption, and candesartan in reducing maximum wall thickness. No drug significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction compared with placebo. In conclusion, on the basis of current studies, commonly used drugs may effectively improve some of the outcome measures in patients with HCM, whereas the novel drug mavacamten showed significant therapeutic effects in most of the remaining outcome measures except for left ventricular ejection fraction.
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.