Xiaoqing Zhang, Dana L. Royer, Gongle Shi, Niiden Ichinnorov, Patrick S. Herendeen, Peter R. Crane, Fabiany Herrera
{"title":"基于气孔和同位素分析的蒙古早白垩世晚期大气二氧化碳估算。","authors":"Xiaoqing Zhang, Dana L. Royer, Gongle Shi, Niiden Ichinnorov, Patrick S. Herendeen, Peter R. Crane, Fabiany Herrera","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>The Aptian–Albian (121.4–100.5 Ma) was a greenhouse period with global temperatures estimated as 10–15°C warmer than pre-industrial conditions, so it is surprising that the most reliable CO<sub>2</sub> estimates from this time are <1400 ppm. This low CO<sub>2</sub> during a warm period implies a very high Earth-system sensitivity in the range of 6 to 9°C per CO<sub>2</sub> doubling between the Aptian-Albian and today.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We applied a well-vetted paleo-CO<sub>2</sub> proxy based on leaf gas-exchange principles (Franks model) to two <i>Pseudotorellia</i> species from three stratigraphically similar samples at the Tevshiin Govi lignite mine in central Mongolia (~119.7–100.5 Ma).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our median estimated CO<sub>2</sub> concentration from the three respective samples was 2132, 2405, and 2770 ppm. The primary reason for the high estimated CO<sub>2</sub> but with relatively large uncertainties is the very low stomatal density in both species, where small variations propagate to large changes in estimated CO<sub>2</sub>. Indeed, we found that at least 15 leaves are required before the aggregate estimated CO<sub>2</sub> approaches that of the full data set.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our three CO<sub>2</sub> estimates all exceeded 2000 ppm, translating to an Earth-system sensitivity (~3–5°C/CO<sub>2</sub> doubling) that is more in keeping with the current understanding of the long-term climate system. Because of our large sample size, the directly measured inputs did not contribute much to the overall uncertainty in estimated CO<sub>2</sub>; instead, the inferred inputs were responsible for most of the overall uncertainty and thus should be scrutinized for their value choices.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimates of late Early Cretaceous atmospheric CO2 from Mongolia based on stomatal and isotopic analysis of Pseudotorellia\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoqing Zhang, Dana L. Royer, Gongle Shi, Niiden Ichinnorov, Patrick S. Herendeen, Peter R. Crane, Fabiany Herrera\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajb2.16376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Premise</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Aptian–Albian (121.4–100.5 Ma) was a greenhouse period with global temperatures estimated as 10–15°C warmer than pre-industrial conditions, so it is surprising that the most reliable CO<sub>2</sub> estimates from this time are <1400 ppm. This low CO<sub>2</sub> during a warm period implies a very high Earth-system sensitivity in the range of 6 to 9°C per CO<sub>2</sub> doubling between the Aptian-Albian and today.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We applied a well-vetted paleo-CO<sub>2</sub> proxy based on leaf gas-exchange principles (Franks model) to two <i>Pseudotorellia</i> species from three stratigraphically similar samples at the Tevshiin Govi lignite mine in central Mongolia (~119.7–100.5 Ma).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our median estimated CO<sub>2</sub> concentration from the three respective samples was 2132, 2405, and 2770 ppm. The primary reason for the high estimated CO<sub>2</sub> but with relatively large uncertainties is the very low stomatal density in both species, where small variations propagate to large changes in estimated CO<sub>2</sub>. Indeed, we found that at least 15 leaves are required before the aggregate estimated CO<sub>2</sub> approaches that of the full data set.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our three CO<sub>2</sub> estimates all exceeded 2000 ppm, translating to an Earth-system sensitivity (~3–5°C/CO<sub>2</sub> doubling) that is more in keeping with the current understanding of the long-term climate system. Because of our large sample size, the directly measured inputs did not contribute much to the overall uncertainty in estimated CO<sub>2</sub>; instead, the inferred inputs were responsible for most of the overall uncertainty and thus should be scrutinized for their value choices.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16376\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimates of late Early Cretaceous atmospheric CO2 from Mongolia based on stomatal and isotopic analysis of Pseudotorellia
Premise
The Aptian–Albian (121.4–100.5 Ma) was a greenhouse period with global temperatures estimated as 10–15°C warmer than pre-industrial conditions, so it is surprising that the most reliable CO2 estimates from this time are <1400 ppm. This low CO2 during a warm period implies a very high Earth-system sensitivity in the range of 6 to 9°C per CO2 doubling between the Aptian-Albian and today.
Methods
We applied a well-vetted paleo-CO2 proxy based on leaf gas-exchange principles (Franks model) to two Pseudotorellia species from three stratigraphically similar samples at the Tevshiin Govi lignite mine in central Mongolia (~119.7–100.5 Ma).
Results
Our median estimated CO2 concentration from the three respective samples was 2132, 2405, and 2770 ppm. The primary reason for the high estimated CO2 but with relatively large uncertainties is the very low stomatal density in both species, where small variations propagate to large changes in estimated CO2. Indeed, we found that at least 15 leaves are required before the aggregate estimated CO2 approaches that of the full data set.
Conclusions
Our three CO2 estimates all exceeded 2000 ppm, translating to an Earth-system sensitivity (~3–5°C/CO2 doubling) that is more in keeping with the current understanding of the long-term climate system. Because of our large sample size, the directly measured inputs did not contribute much to the overall uncertainty in estimated CO2; instead, the inferred inputs were responsible for most of the overall uncertainty and thus should be scrutinized for their value choices.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.