{"title":"它们都很震撼对LeuT折叠转运体构象移动的系统比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.str.2024.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many membrane transporters share the LeuT fold—two five-helix repeats inverted across the membrane plane. Despite hundreds of structures, whether distinct conformational mechanisms are supported by the LeuT fold has not been systematically determined. After annotating published LeuT-fold structures, we analyzed distance difference matrices (DDMs) for nine proteins with multiple available conformations. We identified rigid bodies and relative movements of transmembrane helices (TMs) during distinct steps of the transport cycle. In all transporters, the bundle (first two TMs of each repeat) rotates relative to the hash (third and fourth TMs). Motions of the arms (fifth TM) to close or open the intracellular and outer vestibules are common, as is a TM1a swing, with notable variations in the opening-closing motions of the outer vestibule. Our analyses suggest that LeuT-fold transporters layer distinct motions on a common bundle-hash rock and demonstrate that systematic analyses can provide new insights into large structural datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":22168,"journal":{"name":"Structure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"They all rock: A systematic comparison of conformational movements in LeuT-fold transporters\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.str.2024.06.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many membrane transporters share the LeuT fold—two five-helix repeats inverted across the membrane plane. Despite hundreds of structures, whether distinct conformational mechanisms are supported by the LeuT fold has not been systematically determined. After annotating published LeuT-fold structures, we analyzed distance difference matrices (DDMs) for nine proteins with multiple available conformations. We identified rigid bodies and relative movements of transmembrane helices (TMs) during distinct steps of the transport cycle. In all transporters, the bundle (first two TMs of each repeat) rotates relative to the hash (third and fourth TMs). Motions of the arms (fifth TM) to close or open the intracellular and outer vestibules are common, as is a TM1a swing, with notable variations in the opening-closing motions of the outer vestibule. Our analyses suggest that LeuT-fold transporters layer distinct motions on a common bundle-hash rock and demonstrate that systematic analyses can provide new insights into large structural datasets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structure\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2024.06.015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2024.06.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
They all rock: A systematic comparison of conformational movements in LeuT-fold transporters
Many membrane transporters share the LeuT fold—two five-helix repeats inverted across the membrane plane. Despite hundreds of structures, whether distinct conformational mechanisms are supported by the LeuT fold has not been systematically determined. After annotating published LeuT-fold structures, we analyzed distance difference matrices (DDMs) for nine proteins with multiple available conformations. We identified rigid bodies and relative movements of transmembrane helices (TMs) during distinct steps of the transport cycle. In all transporters, the bundle (first two TMs of each repeat) rotates relative to the hash (third and fourth TMs). Motions of the arms (fifth TM) to close or open the intracellular and outer vestibules are common, as is a TM1a swing, with notable variations in the opening-closing motions of the outer vestibule. Our analyses suggest that LeuT-fold transporters layer distinct motions on a common bundle-hash rock and demonstrate that systematic analyses can provide new insights into large structural datasets.
期刊介绍:
Structure aims to publish papers of exceptional interest in the field of structural biology. The journal strives to be essential reading for structural biologists, as well as biologists and biochemists that are interested in macromolecular structure and function. Structure strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that present structural and molecular insights into biological function and mechanism. Other reports that address fundamental questions in structural biology, such as structure-based examinations of protein evolution, folding, and/or design, will also be considered. We will consider the application of any method, experimental or computational, at high or low resolution, to conduct structural investigations, as long as the method is appropriate for the biological, functional, and mechanistic question(s) being addressed. Likewise, reports describing single-molecule analysis of biological mechanisms are welcome.
In general, the editors encourage submission of experimental structural studies that are enriched by an analysis of structure-activity relationships and will not consider studies that solely report structural information unless the structure or analysis is of exceptional and broad interest. Studies reporting only homology models, de novo models, or molecular dynamics simulations are also discouraged unless the models are informed by or validated by novel experimental data; rationalization of a large body of existing experimental evidence and making testable predictions based on a model or simulation is often not considered sufficient.