物质奖励能缓和儿童认知努力中的性别差异

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Paula Apascaritei , Jonas Radl , Madeline Swarr
{"title":"物质奖励能缓和儿童认知努力中的性别差异","authors":"Paula Apascaritei ,&nbsp;Jonas Radl ,&nbsp;Madeline Swarr","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Effort is crucial for academic performance and varies by gender. However, it is not clear at what age nor under what circumstances gender differences in effort arise. Using behavioral measures of executive function from 799 fifth-grade students, we find no gender differences in cognitive effort in the absence of rewards. However, boys exert more effort than girls when materially incentivized. Adding a status incentive on top of material rewards does not further increase the gender gap. According to expectancy-value theory, the degree to which incentives moderate the gender effect may depend on ability. We find that while low-ability girls work as hard as high-ability girls when no incentives are present, low-ability boys tend to disengage from effortful tasks. High-ability girls increase effort more than low-ability girls when material incentives are added, and high-ability boys increase effort more than low-ability boys when status incentives are added.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000876/pdfft?md5=ef9d7636187ba72078f0b0390b959788&pid=1-s2.0-S1041608024000876-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material incentives moderate gender differences in cognitive effort among children\",\"authors\":\"Paula Apascaritei ,&nbsp;Jonas Radl ,&nbsp;Madeline Swarr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Effort is crucial for academic performance and varies by gender. However, it is not clear at what age nor under what circumstances gender differences in effort arise. Using behavioral measures of executive function from 799 fifth-grade students, we find no gender differences in cognitive effort in the absence of rewards. However, boys exert more effort than girls when materially incentivized. Adding a status incentive on top of material rewards does not further increase the gender gap. According to expectancy-value theory, the degree to which incentives moderate the gender effect may depend on ability. We find that while low-ability girls work as hard as high-ability girls when no incentives are present, low-ability boys tend to disengage from effortful tasks. High-ability girls increase effort more than low-ability girls when material incentives are added, and high-ability boys increase effort more than low-ability boys when status incentives are added.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000876/pdfft?md5=ef9d7636187ba72078f0b0390b959788&pid=1-s2.0-S1041608024000876-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000876\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

努力对学习成绩至关重要,而且因性别而异。然而,目前还不清楚在什么年龄段和什么情况下会出现努力程度的性别差异。通过对 799 名五年级学生执行功能的行为测量,我们发现在没有奖励的情况下,认知努力没有性别差异。然而,在有物质奖励的情况下,男生比女生更努力。在物质奖励的基础上增加地位激励,并不会进一步拉大性别差异。根据期望值理论,激励措施对性别效应的调节程度可能取决于能力。我们发现,在没有激励措施的情况下,能力低的女孩和能力高的女孩一样努力,而能力低的男孩则倾向于脱离努力任务。当加入物质激励时,高能力女孩比低能力女孩更努力;当加入地位激励时,高能力男孩比低能力男孩更努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Material incentives moderate gender differences in cognitive effort among children

Effort is crucial for academic performance and varies by gender. However, it is not clear at what age nor under what circumstances gender differences in effort arise. Using behavioral measures of executive function from 799 fifth-grade students, we find no gender differences in cognitive effort in the absence of rewards. However, boys exert more effort than girls when materially incentivized. Adding a status incentive on top of material rewards does not further increase the gender gap. According to expectancy-value theory, the degree to which incentives moderate the gender effect may depend on ability. We find that while low-ability girls work as hard as high-ability girls when no incentives are present, low-ability boys tend to disengage from effortful tasks. High-ability girls increase effort more than low-ability girls when material incentives are added, and high-ability boys increase effort more than low-ability boys when status incentives are added.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信