选择性报告抗生素药敏试验结果对肺炎链球菌血流感染患者使用抗生素的影响。

Biomedicine hub Pub Date : 2024-05-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000537770
Florian Geismann, Kathleen Brueckner, Michael Pfeifer, Bernd Salzberger, Stilla Bauernfeind, Florian Hitzenbichler, Michaela Simon, Aila Caplunik-Pratsch, Wulf Schneider-Brachert, Clemens Wiest, Thilo Hinterberger, Tamara Ruegamer, Arno Mohr
{"title":"选择性报告抗生素药敏试验结果对肺炎链球菌血流感染患者使用抗生素的影响。","authors":"Florian Geismann, Kathleen Brueckner, Michael Pfeifer, Bernd Salzberger, Stilla Bauernfeind, Florian Hitzenbichler, Michaela Simon, Aila Caplunik-Pratsch, Wulf Schneider-Brachert, Clemens Wiest, Thilo Hinterberger, Tamara Ruegamer, Arno Mohr","doi":"10.1159/000537770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Invasive pneumococcal disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in infectious diseases. Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results might lead to a tailored antibiotic therapy and could therefore be an important antibiotic stewardship program intervention. The aim of this study was to analyse whether a switch to selective reporting of antibiotic test results leads to a more focused antibiotic therapy in patients with a bloodstream infection with <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed as a retrospective cohort study at the University Hospital Regensburg, Germany. All blood cultures positive for <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> between 2006 and 2021 were analysed. In 2014, a switch to selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results omitting sensitivity results for agents not recommended was introduced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four hours after final antibiotic susceptibility test results were available, 20.9% before (BI) versus 15.4% after implementation (AI) of selective reporting of antibiotic test results received a narrow-spectrum penicillin, while only 2.3% BI versus 5.8% AI received a narrow-spectrum penicillin from the beginning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results without further antimicrobial stewardship interventions did not lead to a higher use of a narrow-spectrum penicillin in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":101351,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine hub","volume":"9 1","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Selective Reporting of Antibiotic Susceptibility Test Results on Antibiotic Use in Patients with Bloodstream Infection with <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Florian Geismann, Kathleen Brueckner, Michael Pfeifer, Bernd Salzberger, Stilla Bauernfeind, Florian Hitzenbichler, Michaela Simon, Aila Caplunik-Pratsch, Wulf Schneider-Brachert, Clemens Wiest, Thilo Hinterberger, Tamara Ruegamer, Arno Mohr\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000537770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Invasive pneumococcal disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in infectious diseases. Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results might lead to a tailored antibiotic therapy and could therefore be an important antibiotic stewardship program intervention. The aim of this study was to analyse whether a switch to selective reporting of antibiotic test results leads to a more focused antibiotic therapy in patients with a bloodstream infection with <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed as a retrospective cohort study at the University Hospital Regensburg, Germany. All blood cultures positive for <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> between 2006 and 2021 were analysed. In 2014, a switch to selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results omitting sensitivity results for agents not recommended was introduced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four hours after final antibiotic susceptibility test results were available, 20.9% before (BI) versus 15.4% after implementation (AI) of selective reporting of antibiotic test results received a narrow-spectrum penicillin, while only 2.3% BI versus 5.8% AI received a narrow-spectrum penicillin from the beginning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results without further antimicrobial stewardship interventions did not lead to a higher use of a narrow-spectrum penicillin in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedicine hub\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"67-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250472/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedicine hub\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine hub","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病是传染病发病和死亡的主要原因。有选择性地报告抗生素药敏试验结果可能会带来有针对性的抗生素治疗,因此可能成为抗生素管理计划的一项重要干预措施。本研究旨在分析在肺炎链球菌血流感染患者中改用选择性报告抗生素检测结果是否会使抗生素治疗更有针对性:本研究是在德国雷根斯堡大学医院进行的一项回顾性队列研究。研究分析了 2006 年至 2021 年间所有肺炎链球菌阳性血培养结果。2014 年,医院开始有选择性地报告抗生素药敏试验结果,省略了不推荐使用的药物的药敏结果:在最终抗生素药敏试验结果出来 24 小时后,选择性报告抗生素试验结果之前(BI)有 20.9%的人使用了窄谱青霉素,而实施之后(AI)有 15.4%的人使用了窄谱青霉素,而从一开始就使用窄谱青霉素的 BI 只有 2.3%,AI 只有 5.8%:结论:在本研究中,选择性报告抗生素药敏试验结果而不采取进一步的抗菌药物管理干预措施并不会导致窄谱青霉素的使用率提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Selective Reporting of Antibiotic Susceptibility Test Results on Antibiotic Use in Patients with Bloodstream Infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Introduction: Invasive pneumococcal disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in infectious diseases. Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results might lead to a tailored antibiotic therapy and could therefore be an important antibiotic stewardship program intervention. The aim of this study was to analyse whether a switch to selective reporting of antibiotic test results leads to a more focused antibiotic therapy in patients with a bloodstream infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Methods: This study was performed as a retrospective cohort study at the University Hospital Regensburg, Germany. All blood cultures positive for Streptococcus pneumoniae between 2006 and 2021 were analysed. In 2014, a switch to selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results omitting sensitivity results for agents not recommended was introduced.

Results: Twenty-four hours after final antibiotic susceptibility test results were available, 20.9% before (BI) versus 15.4% after implementation (AI) of selective reporting of antibiotic test results received a narrow-spectrum penicillin, while only 2.3% BI versus 5.8% AI received a narrow-spectrum penicillin from the beginning.

Conclusion: Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results without further antimicrobial stewardship interventions did not lead to a higher use of a narrow-spectrum penicillin in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信