姑息关怀学生学习成果评估工具:文献综述。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Megan P Lippe, Gabrielle Wingett, Andra Davis, Theresa Jizba, Olga Ehrlich, Carrie L Cormack, Tracy Fasolino, Toni L Glover, Susan Meskis, Raeann G LeBlanc, Dan Weiss, Amanda J Kirkpatrick
{"title":"姑息关怀学生学习成果评估工具:文献综述。","authors":"Megan P Lippe, Gabrielle Wingett, Andra Davis, Theresa Jizba, Olga Ehrlich, Carrie L Cormack, Tracy Fasolino, Toni L Glover, Susan Meskis, Raeann G LeBlanc, Dan Weiss, Amanda J Kirkpatrick","doi":"10.1097/NJH.0000000000001051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Primary palliative care is a core component of nursing practice for which all students must receive formal education. Through competency-based education, nursing students develop the knowledge, attitudes, and skills to deliver quality primary palliative care before they transition to practice. Nurse educators in academic and practice settings should use reliable and valid means to evaluate student learning across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. Expert faculty conducted a literature review to identify published instruments that evaluate primary palliative care student learning outcomes. Selected articles were required to include instrument reliability, validity, or both. The literature search yielded 20 articles that report on the development and testing of 21 instruments. Findings are organized into 3 learning domains that encompass 5 outcomes. Four instruments assess knowledge within the cognitive domain. In the affective domain, 3 instruments assess attitudes about caring for seriously ill or dying patients, 7 assess attitudes about death, and 5 assess self-efficacy. Competence and competency are evaluated in the psychomotor domain with 4 tools. Instrument implementation considerations within each domain are discussed. Faculty are encouraged to use robust evaluation measures such as those identified in the literature review to measure primary palliative care learning outcomes within a competency-based education framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":54807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instruments for Evaluating Student Learning Outcomes in Palliative Care: A Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Megan P Lippe, Gabrielle Wingett, Andra Davis, Theresa Jizba, Olga Ehrlich, Carrie L Cormack, Tracy Fasolino, Toni L Glover, Susan Meskis, Raeann G LeBlanc, Dan Weiss, Amanda J Kirkpatrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NJH.0000000000001051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Primary palliative care is a core component of nursing practice for which all students must receive formal education. Through competency-based education, nursing students develop the knowledge, attitudes, and skills to deliver quality primary palliative care before they transition to practice. Nurse educators in academic and practice settings should use reliable and valid means to evaluate student learning across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. Expert faculty conducted a literature review to identify published instruments that evaluate primary palliative care student learning outcomes. Selected articles were required to include instrument reliability, validity, or both. The literature search yielded 20 articles that report on the development and testing of 21 instruments. Findings are organized into 3 learning domains that encompass 5 outcomes. Four instruments assess knowledge within the cognitive domain. In the affective domain, 3 instruments assess attitudes about caring for seriously ill or dying patients, 7 assess attitudes about death, and 5 assess self-efficacy. Competence and competency are evaluated in the psychomotor domain with 4 tools. Instrument implementation considerations within each domain are discussed. Faculty are encouraged to use robust evaluation measures such as those identified in the literature review to measure primary palliative care learning outcomes within a competency-based education framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000001051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000001051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

初级姑息关怀是护理实践的核心组成部分,所有学生都必须接受正规教育。通过以能力为基础的教育,护理专业的学生可以在转入实践之前掌握提供高质量的初级姑息关怀所需的知识、态度和技能。学术和实践环境中的护士教育者应使用可靠有效的方法来评估学生在认知、情感和心理运动领域的学习情况。专家教师进行了文献综述,以确定已发表的评估初级姑息关怀学生学习成果的工具。所选文章必须包括工具的可靠性、有效性或两者兼具。文献检索共获得 20 篇文章,报告了 21 种工具的开发和测试情况。研究结果分为 3 个学习领域,包含 5 项成果。在认知领域,有 4 种工具对知识进行评估。在情感领域,3 种工具评估对重症或垂危病人的护理态度,7 种工具评估对死亡的态度,5 种工具评估自我效能感。在心理运动领域,有 4 种工具对能力和胜任力进行评估。我们还讨论了在每个领域实施工具的注意事项。鼓励教师在基于能力的教育框架内,使用文献综述中确定的稳健评估措施来衡量初级姑息关怀学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Instruments for Evaluating Student Learning Outcomes in Palliative Care: A Literature Review.

Primary palliative care is a core component of nursing practice for which all students must receive formal education. Through competency-based education, nursing students develop the knowledge, attitudes, and skills to deliver quality primary palliative care before they transition to practice. Nurse educators in academic and practice settings should use reliable and valid means to evaluate student learning across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. Expert faculty conducted a literature review to identify published instruments that evaluate primary palliative care student learning outcomes. Selected articles were required to include instrument reliability, validity, or both. The literature search yielded 20 articles that report on the development and testing of 21 instruments. Findings are organized into 3 learning domains that encompass 5 outcomes. Four instruments assess knowledge within the cognitive domain. In the affective domain, 3 instruments assess attitudes about caring for seriously ill or dying patients, 7 assess attitudes about death, and 5 assess self-efficacy. Competence and competency are evaluated in the psychomotor domain with 4 tools. Instrument implementation considerations within each domain are discussed. Faculty are encouraged to use robust evaluation measures such as those identified in the literature review to measure primary palliative care learning outcomes within a competency-based education framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing (JHPN) is the official journal of the Hospice & Palliative Nurses Association and is the professional, peer-reviewed journal for nurses in hospice and palliative care settings. Focusing on the clinical, educational and research aspects of care, JHPN offers current and reliable information on end of life nursing. Feature articles in areas such as symptom management, ethics, and futility of care address holistic care across the continuum. Book and article reviews, clinical updates and case studies create a journal that meets the didactic and practical needs of the nurse caring for patients with serious illnesses in advanced stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信