英国儿童神经系统疾病研究重点的确定。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jill Cadwgan, Jane Goodwin, Barbara Babcock, Molly Brick, Richard Chin, Ava Easton, Ben Green, Siobhan Hannan, Rhys P D Inward, Suzannah Kinsella, Callum King, Manju A Kurian, Phillip Levine, Andrew Mallick, Jeremy Parr, Carol Anne Partridge, Sam Amin, Dan Lumsden, J Helen Cross, Ming J Lim
{"title":"英国儿童神经系统疾病研究重点的确定。","authors":"Jill Cadwgan, Jane Goodwin, Barbara Babcock, Molly Brick, Richard Chin, Ava Easton, Ben Green, Siobhan Hannan, Rhys P D Inward, Suzannah Kinsella, Callum King, Manju A Kurian, Phillip Levine, Andrew Mallick, Jeremy Parr, Carol Anne Partridge, Sam Amin, Dan Lumsden, J Helen Cross, Ming J Lim","doi":"10.1111/dmcn.16021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify research priorities regarding the effectiveness of interventions for children and young people (CYP) with childhood neurological conditions (CNCs). These include common conditions such as epilepsies and cerebral palsy, as well as many rare conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and the James Lind Alliance (JLA) champion and facilitate priority setting partnerships (PSPs) between patients, caregivers, and clinicians (stakeholders) to identify the most important unanswered questions for research (uncertainties). A NIHR-JLA and British Paediatric Neurology Association collaboration used the JLA PSP methodology. This consisted of two surveys to stakeholders: survey 1 (to identify uncertainties) and survey 2 (a prioritization survey). The final top 10 priorities were agreed by consensus in a stakeholder workshop.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty-two charities and partner organizations were invited to participate. In survey 1, 701 participants (70% non-clinicians, including CYP and parent and caregivers) submitted 1800 uncertainties from which 44 uncertainties were identified for prioritization in survey 2; from these, 1451 participants (83% non-clinicians) selected their top 10 priorities. An unweighted amalgamated score across participant roles was used to select 26. In the final workshop, 14 health care professionals, 11 parent and caregivers, and two CYP ranked the 26 questions to finalize the top 10 priorities. Ten top priority questions were identified regarding interventions to treat CYP with CNCs and their associated comorbidities, for example, sleep, emotional well-being, and distressing symptoms.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The results of this study will inform research into the effectiveness of interventions for children with neurological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50587,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UK research priority setting for childhood neurological conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Jill Cadwgan, Jane Goodwin, Barbara Babcock, Molly Brick, Richard Chin, Ava Easton, Ben Green, Siobhan Hannan, Rhys P D Inward, Suzannah Kinsella, Callum King, Manju A Kurian, Phillip Levine, Andrew Mallick, Jeremy Parr, Carol Anne Partridge, Sam Amin, Dan Lumsden, J Helen Cross, Ming J Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dmcn.16021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify research priorities regarding the effectiveness of interventions for children and young people (CYP) with childhood neurological conditions (CNCs). These include common conditions such as epilepsies and cerebral palsy, as well as many rare conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and the James Lind Alliance (JLA) champion and facilitate priority setting partnerships (PSPs) between patients, caregivers, and clinicians (stakeholders) to identify the most important unanswered questions for research (uncertainties). A NIHR-JLA and British Paediatric Neurology Association collaboration used the JLA PSP methodology. This consisted of two surveys to stakeholders: survey 1 (to identify uncertainties) and survey 2 (a prioritization survey). The final top 10 priorities were agreed by consensus in a stakeholder workshop.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty-two charities and partner organizations were invited to participate. In survey 1, 701 participants (70% non-clinicians, including CYP and parent and caregivers) submitted 1800 uncertainties from which 44 uncertainties were identified for prioritization in survey 2; from these, 1451 participants (83% non-clinicians) selected their top 10 priorities. An unweighted amalgamated score across participant roles was used to select 26. In the final workshop, 14 health care professionals, 11 parent and caregivers, and two CYP ranked the 26 questions to finalize the top 10 priorities. Ten top priority questions were identified regarding interventions to treat CYP with CNCs and their associated comorbidities, for example, sleep, emotional well-being, and distressing symptoms.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The results of this study will inform research into the effectiveness of interventions for children with neurological conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定针对患有儿童神经系统疾病 (CNC) 的儿童和青少年 (CYP) 的干预措施有效性的研究重点。这些疾病包括癫痫和大脑性麻痹等常见疾病以及许多罕见疾病:方法:美国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)和詹姆斯-林德联盟(JLA)倡导并促进患者、护理人员和临床医生(利益相关者)之间的优先事项确定伙伴关系(PSP),以确定最重要的未决研究问题(不确定性)。NIHR-JLA 和英国儿科神经病学协会合作采用了 JLA PSP 方法。该方法包括对利益相关者进行两次调查:调查 1(确定不确定性)和调查 2(优先顺序调查)。最终的 10 大优先事项在利益相关者研讨会上达成共识:结果:132 个慈善机构和伙伴组织应邀参加了调查。在调查 1 中,701 名参与者(70% 为非临床医生,包括儿童青少年、家长和照护者)提交了 1800 个不确定因素,从中确定了 44 个不确定因素作为调查 2 的优先事项;1451 名参与者(83% 为非临床医生)从中选出了他们的 10 大优先事项。根据参与者角色的非加权综合得分选出 26 个。在最后的研讨会上,14 名医护专业人员、11 名家长和照顾者以及 2 名儿童青少年对 26 个问题进行了排序,最终确定了 10 个最优先考虑的问题。确定的 10 个最优先问题涉及对患有 CNC 的 CYP 及其相关合并症(如睡眠、情绪健康和痛苦症状)的干预治疗:本研究的结果将为研究神经系统疾病儿童干预措施的有效性提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
UK research priority setting for childhood neurological conditions.

Aim: To identify research priorities regarding the effectiveness of interventions for children and young people (CYP) with childhood neurological conditions (CNCs). These include common conditions such as epilepsies and cerebral palsy, as well as many rare conditions.

Method: The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and the James Lind Alliance (JLA) champion and facilitate priority setting partnerships (PSPs) between patients, caregivers, and clinicians (stakeholders) to identify the most important unanswered questions for research (uncertainties). A NIHR-JLA and British Paediatric Neurology Association collaboration used the JLA PSP methodology. This consisted of two surveys to stakeholders: survey 1 (to identify uncertainties) and survey 2 (a prioritization survey). The final top 10 priorities were agreed by consensus in a stakeholder workshop.

Results: One hundred and thirty-two charities and partner organizations were invited to participate. In survey 1, 701 participants (70% non-clinicians, including CYP and parent and caregivers) submitted 1800 uncertainties from which 44 uncertainties were identified for prioritization in survey 2; from these, 1451 participants (83% non-clinicians) selected their top 10 priorities. An unweighted amalgamated score across participant roles was used to select 26. In the final workshop, 14 health care professionals, 11 parent and caregivers, and two CYP ranked the 26 questions to finalize the top 10 priorities. Ten top priority questions were identified regarding interventions to treat CYP with CNCs and their associated comorbidities, for example, sleep, emotional well-being, and distressing symptoms.

Interpretation: The results of this study will inform research into the effectiveness of interventions for children with neurological conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
13.20%
发文量
338
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to publish Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (DMCN), a Mac Keith Press publication and official journal of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) and the British Paediatric Neurology Association (BPNA). For over 50 years, DMCN has defined the field of paediatric neurology and neurodisability and is one of the world’s leading journals in the whole field of paediatrics. DMCN disseminates a range of information worldwide to improve the lives of disabled children and their families. The high quality of published articles is maintained by expert review, including independent statistical assessment, before acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信