Arif Albulushi, Shabib Al-Asmi, Moosa Al-Abri, Hatem Al-Farhan
{"title":"评估肺动脉高压疗法对心包积液和患者存活率的影响。","authors":"Arif Albulushi, Shabib Al-Asmi, Moosa Al-Abri, Hatem Al-Farhan","doi":"10.5001/omj.2024.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) therapies on the incidence of pericardial effusion and its prognostic implications for patient survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients diagnosed with PAH at a high-volume tertiary care center, treated with intravenous or subcutaneous prostanoids. Data were collected from 2015 to 2019, including echocardiographic assessments, right heart catheterization, World Health Organization functional class evaluations, six-minute walk distance tests, and biomarkers such as brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide. Follow-up was conducted at least 90 days post-treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pericardial effusion was observed in 31.7% of patients before therapy. Patients with moderate to large effusions had a significantly higher mortality risk (HR = 1.92; 95% CI 1.1-44.78; <i>p =</i>0.0044), while small effusions appeared protective (HR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.15-0.48; <i>p =</i>0.006). Survival rates declined from 89% at one year to 71% at three years post-therapy, with effusion presence correlating with more severe PAH manifestations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial pericardial effusion severity is a critical predictor of mortality in PAH patients. Early assessment and stratified management of pericardial effusion are essential for optimizing therapeutic outcomes in PAH management. Future research should explore targeted interventions for managing pericardial effusion to improve patient prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19667,"journal":{"name":"Oman Medical Journal","volume":"39 3","pages":"e640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Impact of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Therapies on Pericardial Effusion and Patient Survival.\",\"authors\":\"Arif Albulushi, Shabib Al-Asmi, Moosa Al-Abri, Hatem Al-Farhan\",\"doi\":\"10.5001/omj.2024.82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) therapies on the incidence of pericardial effusion and its prognostic implications for patient survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients diagnosed with PAH at a high-volume tertiary care center, treated with intravenous or subcutaneous prostanoids. Data were collected from 2015 to 2019, including echocardiographic assessments, right heart catheterization, World Health Organization functional class evaluations, six-minute walk distance tests, and biomarkers such as brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide. Follow-up was conducted at least 90 days post-treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pericardial effusion was observed in 31.7% of patients before therapy. Patients with moderate to large effusions had a significantly higher mortality risk (HR = 1.92; 95% CI 1.1-44.78; <i>p =</i>0.0044), while small effusions appeared protective (HR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.15-0.48; <i>p =</i>0.006). Survival rates declined from 89% at one year to 71% at three years post-therapy, with effusion presence correlating with more severe PAH manifestations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial pericardial effusion severity is a critical predictor of mortality in PAH patients. Early assessment and stratified management of pericardial effusion are essential for optimizing therapeutic outcomes in PAH management. Future research should explore targeted interventions for managing pericardial effusion to improve patient prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oman Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"e640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249591/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oman Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2024.82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oman Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2024.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估肺动脉高压(PAH)疗法对心包积液发生率的影响及其对患者生存预后的影响:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了在一家高容量三级医疗中心确诊的60名PAH患者,这些患者接受了静脉或皮下前列腺素治疗。数据收集时间为 2015 年至 2019 年,包括超声心动图评估、右心导管检查、世界卫生组织功能分级评估、六分钟步行距离测试以及脑钠肽和脑钠肽 N 端前体等生物标志物。治疗开始后至少 90 天进行随访:结果:31.7%的患者在治疗前出现心包积液。中度至大量积液患者的死亡风险明显较高(HR = 1.92;95% CI 1.1-44.78;P =0.0044),而少量积液似乎具有保护作用(HR = 0.27;95% CI 0.15-0.48;P =0.006)。治疗后的存活率从一年的89%下降到三年的71%,积液的存在与更严重的PAH表现相关:结论:最初的心包积液严重程度是预测 PAH 患者死亡率的关键因素。心包积液的早期评估和分层管理对于优化 PAH 治疗效果至关重要。未来的研究应探索管理心包积液的针对性干预措施,以改善患者的预后。
Evaluating the Impact of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Therapies on Pericardial Effusion and Patient Survival.
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) therapies on the incidence of pericardial effusion and its prognostic implications for patient survival.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients diagnosed with PAH at a high-volume tertiary care center, treated with intravenous or subcutaneous prostanoids. Data were collected from 2015 to 2019, including echocardiographic assessments, right heart catheterization, World Health Organization functional class evaluations, six-minute walk distance tests, and biomarkers such as brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide. Follow-up was conducted at least 90 days post-treatment initiation.
Results: Pericardial effusion was observed in 31.7% of patients before therapy. Patients with moderate to large effusions had a significantly higher mortality risk (HR = 1.92; 95% CI 1.1-44.78; p =0.0044), while small effusions appeared protective (HR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.15-0.48; p =0.006). Survival rates declined from 89% at one year to 71% at three years post-therapy, with effusion presence correlating with more severe PAH manifestations.
Conclusions: Initial pericardial effusion severity is a critical predictor of mortality in PAH patients. Early assessment and stratified management of pericardial effusion are essential for optimizing therapeutic outcomes in PAH management. Future research should explore targeted interventions for managing pericardial effusion to improve patient prognosis.