后蹲后的体内对比休息对复合训练中垂直跳跃成绩的急性影响

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Liam J Houlton, Jeremy A Moody, Theodoros M Bampouras, Joseph I Esformes
{"title":"后蹲后的体内对比休息对复合训练中垂直跳跃成绩的急性影响","authors":"Liam J Houlton, Jeremy A Moody, Theodoros M Bampouras, Joseph I Esformes","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Houlton, LJ, Moody, JA, Bampouras, TM, and Esformes, JI. Acute effects of intracomplex rest after back squats on vertical jump performance during complex training. J Strength Cond Res 38(11): e645-e655, 2024-Postactivation performance enhancement and complex-contrast sets are prevalent in sports science research. Typical complex-contrast sets consist of heavy back squats, an intracontrast rest period (ICRP) and vertical jumps (countermovement jumps [CMJs], or squat jumps [SJs]). Propulsive impulse (J prop ) is considered the leading indicator of jump performance. However, studies evaluating jump performance during complex-contrast sets use jump height as the primary performance measure, limiting insight into ICRP's effect on jump performance. We assessed the effect of a 3 repetition maximum (3RM) back squat and 6 ICRPs on vertical jump J prop and associated force-time components. Fourteen subjects completed 12 experimental conditions, assigned equally to 4 testing sessions. Independent variables, in a 6 × 2 randomized, counterbalanced design, were ICRP (0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 seconds; ICRP0, ICRP60, ICRP120, ICRP180, ICRP240, ICRP300, respectively) and vertical jump (CMJ and SJ). Conditions consisted of baseline vertical jumps, followed by 3 back squat repetitions at 100% 3RM, an ICRP and experimental jumps. Symmetrized percentage changes between experimental and baseline jumps were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise effect sizes. Results showed significant effects ( p ≤ 0.05) on CMJ average rate of force development (RFD) between ICRP0 and ICRP120 and ICRP0 and ICRP300. Pairwise comparisons showed medium and large effect sizes for and increases in CMJ RFD ( g = 0.83-2.69) whereas SJ RFD decreased ( g = 0.81-2.57). Small effect sizes were found for J prop , peak force, and mean force. Results suggest limited change in J prop ( g = 0.01-0.58), but back squats may potentiate RFD via the stretch-shortening cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"e645-e655"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Effects of Intracontrast Rest After Back Squats on Vertical Jump Performance During Complex Training.\",\"authors\":\"Liam J Houlton, Jeremy A Moody, Theodoros M Bampouras, Joseph I Esformes\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Houlton, LJ, Moody, JA, Bampouras, TM, and Esformes, JI. Acute effects of intracomplex rest after back squats on vertical jump performance during complex training. J Strength Cond Res 38(11): e645-e655, 2024-Postactivation performance enhancement and complex-contrast sets are prevalent in sports science research. Typical complex-contrast sets consist of heavy back squats, an intracontrast rest period (ICRP) and vertical jumps (countermovement jumps [CMJs], or squat jumps [SJs]). Propulsive impulse (J prop ) is considered the leading indicator of jump performance. However, studies evaluating jump performance during complex-contrast sets use jump height as the primary performance measure, limiting insight into ICRP's effect on jump performance. We assessed the effect of a 3 repetition maximum (3RM) back squat and 6 ICRPs on vertical jump J prop and associated force-time components. Fourteen subjects completed 12 experimental conditions, assigned equally to 4 testing sessions. Independent variables, in a 6 × 2 randomized, counterbalanced design, were ICRP (0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 seconds; ICRP0, ICRP60, ICRP120, ICRP180, ICRP240, ICRP300, respectively) and vertical jump (CMJ and SJ). Conditions consisted of baseline vertical jumps, followed by 3 back squat repetitions at 100% 3RM, an ICRP and experimental jumps. Symmetrized percentage changes between experimental and baseline jumps were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise effect sizes. Results showed significant effects ( p ≤ 0.05) on CMJ average rate of force development (RFD) between ICRP0 and ICRP120 and ICRP0 and ICRP300. Pairwise comparisons showed medium and large effect sizes for and increases in CMJ RFD ( g = 0.83-2.69) whereas SJ RFD decreased ( g = 0.81-2.57). Small effect sizes were found for J prop , peak force, and mean force. Results suggest limited change in J prop ( g = 0.01-0.58), but back squats may potentiate RFD via the stretch-shortening cycle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e645-e655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004878\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004878","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Houlton、LJ、Moody、JA、Bampouras、TM 和 Esformes、JI。在复合训练中,背蹲后的复合训练内休息对垂直跳跃成绩的急性影响。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-激活后成绩提高和复合对比组在运动科学研究中十分普遍。典型的复合对比组包括重后蹲,对比内休息时间(intra-contrast rest period, ICRP)和垂直跳跃(反运动跳跃(countermovement jumps, CMJs)或蹲跳(squat jumps, SJs))。推进冲量(Jprop)被认为是衡量跳跃成绩的主要指标。然而,评估复杂对比成套动作中跳跃成绩的研究都将跳跃高度作为主要成绩衡量标准,从而限制了对 ICRP 对跳跃成绩影响的深入了解。我们评估了 3 次最大负重(3RM)深蹲和 6 个 ICRP 对垂直跳跃 Jprop 和相关力-时间成分的影响。14 名受试者完成了 12 个实验条件,平均分配到 4 个测试环节。自变量采用 6 × 2 随机平衡设计,分别为 ICRP(0、60、120、180、240、300 秒;分别为 ICRP0、ICRP60、ICRP120、ICRP180、ICRP240、ICRP300)和垂直跳跃(CMJ 和 SJ)。实验条件包括基线立定跳远、以 100% 3RM 重复 3 次深蹲、ICRP 和实验跳远。使用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)和配对效应大小评估实验跳和基线跳之间的对称百分比变化。结果显示,ICRP0 和 ICRP120 以及 ICRP0 和 ICRP300 对 CMJ 平均发力率(RFD)有明显影响(p ≤ 0.05)。配对比较显示,CMJ RFD 增加(g = 0.83-2.69),而 SJ RFD 减少(g = 0.81-2.57)的效应大小为中等和较大。Jprop、峰值力和平均力的效应大小较小。结果表明,Jprop 的变化有限(g = 0.01-0.58),但深蹲可能会通过拉伸-缩短循环增强 RFD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute Effects of Intracontrast Rest After Back Squats on Vertical Jump Performance During Complex Training.

Abstract: Houlton, LJ, Moody, JA, Bampouras, TM, and Esformes, JI. Acute effects of intracomplex rest after back squats on vertical jump performance during complex training. J Strength Cond Res 38(11): e645-e655, 2024-Postactivation performance enhancement and complex-contrast sets are prevalent in sports science research. Typical complex-contrast sets consist of heavy back squats, an intracontrast rest period (ICRP) and vertical jumps (countermovement jumps [CMJs], or squat jumps [SJs]). Propulsive impulse (J prop ) is considered the leading indicator of jump performance. However, studies evaluating jump performance during complex-contrast sets use jump height as the primary performance measure, limiting insight into ICRP's effect on jump performance. We assessed the effect of a 3 repetition maximum (3RM) back squat and 6 ICRPs on vertical jump J prop and associated force-time components. Fourteen subjects completed 12 experimental conditions, assigned equally to 4 testing sessions. Independent variables, in a 6 × 2 randomized, counterbalanced design, were ICRP (0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 seconds; ICRP0, ICRP60, ICRP120, ICRP180, ICRP240, ICRP300, respectively) and vertical jump (CMJ and SJ). Conditions consisted of baseline vertical jumps, followed by 3 back squat repetitions at 100% 3RM, an ICRP and experimental jumps. Symmetrized percentage changes between experimental and baseline jumps were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise effect sizes. Results showed significant effects ( p ≤ 0.05) on CMJ average rate of force development (RFD) between ICRP0 and ICRP120 and ICRP0 and ICRP300. Pairwise comparisons showed medium and large effect sizes for and increases in CMJ RFD ( g = 0.83-2.69) whereas SJ RFD decreased ( g = 0.81-2.57). Small effect sizes were found for J prop , peak force, and mean force. Results suggest limited change in J prop ( g = 0.01-0.58), but back squats may potentiate RFD via the stretch-shortening cycle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信